That's a lot of stuff.
First of all: Unless more information comes out, we won't know whether NQT or I was targeted, or even someone else who got lucky with a protect. But NQT's claim doesn't mean I'm lying, Ranger.
Why I claimed:My ability was a one-shot. It doesn't have a whole lot of effect on the game anymore, and since information helps town, I thought it was best. This is my first experience with role-heavy games like this, so I'm not sure when a good time to claim is.
Now, one thing pokes out at me about
NQT:He was planning to use his lovers/chat ability on himself. Why himself, when it gave lovers status? Did you feel it was worth it, NQT?
Also, why would your lovers be more likely to kill you than others? Oh wait. Just found some of your reasoning:
My argument is this: 1. I'm immune to kills from lovers. 2. The lovers wouldn't have known this. 3. Scum lovers would have a big incentive to kill me before I out them. 4. The results of the night are consistent with me being targeted by scum lovers. There are of course many other possible occurences, but until I have further info, I can't rule out the possibility just described.
Wait, how would you out them if you don't know they're scum? The only way you'd have that kind of information is if what happened did happen. But since you'd have had to have that information before the attempted kill, this becomes circular reasoning.
Ranger:Sheep: What do you think of NQT's explanation of the missing NK, and do you think he was the real target last night?
I don't know; it's hard to tell. I didn't claim because I was sure it was me, I claimed because it might have been. Also, see my second question to NQT.
ZU:Your last two posts give no impression of being hurried, and they're not PFP. Why do they have very little substance? Do you have nothing to contribute to the conversation?
Tiruin:TWS
Tiruin: Forgot to vote you in my WoT. Anyway:
First of all, perhaps I didn't make this clear enough:
The reason I'm voting you is that I think you lied. I don't think you actually wrote that post to TolyK.
There's other stuff, but that's the main thing.
Then who in the world would I've written that post to?! You vote me because you think I lied - reasonable. So why aren't you poking at anything that correlates to that presumed lie?
Sorry, I mean I don't think you wrote a post. "to TolyK" was clarifying which post. Not sure what you mean by the last sentence, though. You mean asking why you didn't ask TolyK about not answering your questions? You already told me why, and I don't believe you.
Yes I did know it was staying on TolyK. For reasons that:
1. He took most of the weekend because seemingly RL stuff.
1. Is this a reason why you re-voted him, or a reason you find him suspicious, or what? I'm not sure I'm getting at what you mean.
1. ...Yeah, that's the reason I re-voted him. I did think that I posted a reply to his post and thus went on to re-vote him due to the lack of answer to it...only to find that the thing didn't post.
If there's other stuff you mentioned, would you please quote/link it? I'm meaning main reasons, not little additional stuff.
His absence, for a general list of things I'd want to know more about him. I was getting a null read on the guy. Main reasons - he hasn't done much.
A null read? Huh.
She said that she had typed out a post asking TolyK questions and it had forgotten to submit it, and that was why she was suspicious of Tolyk, for not answering questions.
I was suspicious of TolyK for more than that...Are you ignoring what else I conversed about, or blatantly tunneling?
Contradicting yourself, aren't you?
...Dear gods. OK, you think I'm lying > Why. Why.
Alright. I guess I didn't emphasize the meat of my case on you quite enough. Here it is.
I think Tiruin is lying. The reason for this is that she did not mention the questions she said she forgot to post a single time, even though she said TolyK missing those questions was her main reason for voting him. I see no evidence to her having made those questions.Now there is another thing I think you're lying about, and that is thinking my vote was a pressure vote. I know that you say it shouldn't have made a difference in whether people take my vote/case seriously or not, but I seems to me it did. When I first made my case, Ford and Zombie Urist came along and voted on it. When you told everyone you saw my vote as a pressure vote, and I didn't have time to tell them otherwise, the suspicion on you went down by quite a bit(see: Ford's unvoting you). That's just how I see it. You say it shouldn't have worked, but it did.
...You know, I'm sort of getting how you view things now. You're taking these things too seriously - like most things said to you are in their extremes. Why are you delving that deep into what wasn't said? [Meaning: Paranoia.]
@Bolded part: ...Ok, get some rest. You're really overthinking everything - more than I overthink everything...Because that last line is just bordering the lines of grammar and sense.
Someone would kill you, to try to kill you, to frame me. How does that work? They killed me in trying to kill me and then frame the girl because killing someone in the effort of trying to kill someone is very suspicious.
Yeah, I guess I am taking things too seriously. I think a lot of it has to do with trying to prove myself, this being my first "real" game.
That was a mistyping, by the way. Isn't that easy to figure out? It should have been "someone else would kill me to try to frame her", or, "someone else would kill me to frame her".
That makes no sense. Mostly because a TON OF OTHER VARIABLES EXIST, and that in the case of 'NK your suspect' - a thousand other variables would come into play. Too many to list; like "what was that person's relations with the others", "how did they react to the cases presented against/before them", "Why would suspect A be the killer?"...
Also, why did you take that thing seriously? Why did you think that you would be my target?
I guess. A big reason is that I thought you were scum. Since it seemed like my case on you was losing traction without me, I thought you might try to kill me to keep my case from progressing, and then use WIFOM as your coverup.
TWS: Why didn't you question me on anything else earlier? Given your case - you aren't poking on my reads, any other detail that would back it up but deriving the whole thing mostly on an assumption. Do you think that if you're dead, people will drop the case you're trying to push? Why are you thinking along the lines of paranoia? Was the day opening anything to do with your claim?
I didn't poke at your reads because that's not what I thought was scummy. Just because everything about a person isn't scummy, doesn't mean that an incredibly scummy thing means nothing.
Bolded part: Talked about this earlier in this post.
Paranoia? I'm a cautious person. Maybe too cautious.
The day opening? What do you mean? I claimed when the day opened because that's when the thread was unlocked.
I agree with Zrk. Why are you extending already?