RangerI had been hoping for an inspect on me for some time. I hope you're legit.
I do have one problem with what i've found though, if a lover were scum, couldn't they have just gotten one of the other scum to carry out the kill? Any thoughts on this?
They could have, sure, but they wouldn't have known then that I was immune to a lover's attack. There are other possibilities however. Indeed, Sheep could be telling the truth and they could have targeted Sheep. Still a lot that's uncertain right now.
I've got a question for you: what was the name of my ability that you say you inspected? I don't mind people knowing its name.
TolyKI have information that would be helpful to you, NQT.
Not claiming anything yet, though.
You had my hopes up there for a moment! I can understand your reticence. Let's see if I can convince you otherwise.
- Why would it make sense for scum to NK you to "not root them out"? That only works on the premise that you know they're scum, and you'll root them out. It would be better for them to lie low, wouldn't it, in this case? Or does it go down into WIFOM?
My argument is this: 1. I'm immune to kills from lovers. 2. The lovers wouldn't have known this. 3. Scum lovers would have a big incentive to kill me before I out them. 4. The results of the night are consistent with me being targeted by scum lovers. There are of course many other possible occurences, but until I have further info, I can't rule out the possibility just described.
- You've shown one of your abilities blatantly, you somehow know that Vector targeted Zrk2, and you have at least one more card up your sleeve. And your third ability is a daytime ability.
Is this a question? My lovers ability was a one-shot day-or-night. I could have received the information about Zrk2 and Vector from another player's ability. It's not in my interests to speculate here.
- "Zrk2 has some power that allows him information or powers from the person who targeted him"... what? Which hole did you take that out of?
I said 'If... Zrk2 has some power...', I'm not saying he has. If he does then this info I've just given might be helpful for him to know.
- Vector said "interesting". What do you make out of that?
Given that she was my sternest critic before, I'd really like to know what she has to say.
- If you were to be put to the noose today, would you tell everyone who the lovers were, or not?
If the lovers were leading it, yes. If the lovers were letting it happen without offering good cases on an alternative, most probably. If they had given a good case on someone else and were powerless to stop my mislynch, and there are other indicators that both are town, then I'd probably keep my mouth shut. Either way, I'd leave it late in the day to say so, to give the possible town-lovers the most breathing space. Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
ZUAre you serious? You knew you were "fond of Ford" and didn't think anything of it and lynched him?? LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
Also your role (based on your current claim) seems a looooooooooot more complicated than mine. Hmmm....
Also also, its difficult to determine why there's no NK, especially so in a BYOR and introduces so much WIFOM.
Pretty much. I was seriously kicking myself afterwards. I think this hidden weakness was put into balance the complexity/power of my role. Definitely reread your own role PM.
TiruinPlease try to reflect for a moment before posting. Obviously, a scum lover wouldn't want me to say who they were, as it would make them much more vulnerable. All I know for sure is 1. there was no NK and 2. this is consistent with a lover trying to NK me and 3. a scum or 3rd party lover would have very good reason to kill me. Which part of this do you disagree with?
1. There may have been an NK and the killer may be blocked/delayed/hit a protect/hit a +1 Hp person (seriously, these exist - check up the past BYOR...that had a crazy amount of +1 people [ Where Hapah and Bookthras were bros])
> Why are you sure there was no NK as opposed to any of the alternatives above?
I think there was a NK and it failed. There's a lot of possible things that could have happened, hence why I'm holding off on outing the lovers, doing better reads and waiting for more information).
2. Consistent, agreeable, but that isn't the conclusive case unless you've pretty much of a case on those lovers enough to implicate whoever they are since it seems you're shedding more of a 'I'm afraid one of those I love is scum' light other than poke at suspects yesterday. While this is justified that you...can't vote (totally agree on the info though), that's how it seems to me - focusing more on scum lovers.
Sure, and I sincerely hope the lovers I picked are town and I'm not going to out them unless I'm as certain as I can be otherwise. However, this is exactly the kind of result I expected from lovers trying to kill me- and no one would have known this before hand.
3. ...Why you as opposed to anyone else? I mean, unless you've a puppetmaster's box of strings in that power, then they're quite free with their kill - the bare fact that you revealed that trap has either dulled your surprise, or there's yet another string in that ball of yarn you're spinning.
There always more strings Tiruin. Of the two people that have claimed immunity to attack, I'm saying I'm a more likely target than Sheep. Am I wrong here?
Is there anything that happened then, affecting your perception now?
At the BM? I'm not letting the fact that you were scum two BM's in a row make me think you're scum now- that'd be ridiculous. Also, I try not to rely on meta-tells. Of course though, my perspective has deepened with every game.
Author
Topic: Magic Mafia - Game Over! (Read 220749 times)