Exams done.
On Fallacy: Hyperactive newbie with tunnel vision and little idea of how to tactfully go after his targets. I've seen this sort of thing before. Doesn't make him scum. Pretty sure any good scumteam would have told him to calm down and not yell out the equivalent of "NQT SCUM SK MAF-ALLY EVERYTHING" almost every post, or at least have given him some advice on how to present his case.
TDS: Why am I asking about support for my test? Same reason for most questions: because it tells me things about those answering.
Tawa: Support because NQT's suspicious. Low-effort answer, but consistent with his suspicion of NQT.
Fallacy: Support, detailed reasons given. Thinks I have an inspect. Answer fits known beliefs about my test and about NQT. Best/most thoughtful answer of the lot, by quite a bit.
4maskwolf: Neutral due to lack of info. Bland, but sensible.
TDS: Full support due to lack of knowledge of NQT. Is voting NQT.
flabort: Wishy-washy neutrality, but thinks I have a kill. Considering flabort
says he wants NQT to live to D2, something's wrong here.
Deus: Neutral due to lack of info. Bland, but sensible.
Teneb: Support "to a certain extent," due to wanting information about NQT and/or me. Odd answer.
Aside from player-specific points, it's obvious from the complete lack of opposition that nobody actually believes the spreading infection claim.
flabort: No full read list yet. Even late D1, I don't have a solid set of reads together yet. Exam season (finally done!).
I'm afraid I don't understand the questions about the key step I missed. Which actions were noted?
You brought up my response to NQT's response to my claim, and called it baffling. You never connected that to scumminess. You brought up how my claim was in the style of NQT's, and declared that suspicious, but never said how.
Anyway, you claim to think that
NQT should at least live to D2. Despite that belief, you take a neutral stance on what you seem to strongly believe is an NK aimed at NQT tonight. Any reason your pro-NQT-survival stance disappears so quickly? Why do you not oppose my test when you support NQT's survival past it,
flabort?
Teneb: Why so willing to back my test, a test that sounds an awful lot like a nightkill? Is NQT worthy of killing to you?
FallacyofUrist, you seem to be very focused on NQT's first post. Is there anything else you have found suspicious or noteworthy?
4maskwolf: Is this a lynch case on Fallacy, or first and foremost a pressure vote? Because it feels a lot like a late, near-lethal pressure vote, and one you haven't followed up on. Without the extension, this would be an awfully tense time for a pressure vote (with about 3 hours left to the pre-extension end of the day now). What do you think of the extension? What led you to not request an extension?
Everyone who is voting, why are your votes as they are?
It was placed for your dodging, contributing nothing. You're not improving much, but you say you've been busy. Let's see your next post.