@Vector:
And from my point of view if you have an accusation as vague as "I dunno, you just feel off," expecting anything logical back as the reason for this is incredibly stupid. It's not based on anything I'm doing. It's not an attack anyone can defend themselves against, so voting without preparation to lynch on those grounds alone is stupid and noobish, if not scummy.
Yes, I am indeed considering not playing Mafia anymore, but I feel like I should stick out whatever I signed up for. I have plenty mental reserve to play but I don't have any more patience for this ill-thought-out bullshit.
Then maybe you should refrain from talking about your personal problems during a game, it comes off as an emotional appeal weirdly. You have all of my sympathies, but avoid the personal stuff I would say.
@Tiruin:
@Tiruin:
You cast a ward on me? What exactly does that entail?
Also, your wincon is to protect somebody? Is that me? I don't like your "I don't mind getting lynched by the town" attitude, but your behavior is odd and contrary.
Ward: Protection from magic and other unholy devices. My use of the verb 'cast' in conjunction to it? Not needed, but just me stating 'I do (x) at you!', more of an 'I wonder what would people react to if I said "cast"'. Just like what a guardian angel would do.
Okay.
...And yes. Protect in the terms of 'I don't want you killed/slain/murdered/tainted/done in/kicking the bucket'.
"And no, I'm not saying who it is. Why are you asking me if I'd say who it is?"
Because I find it odd to cast a protect on somebody who isn't your protect target.
Two things wrong:
> I cast my protect on somebody who is my protect target.
> I don't cast my protect on somebody who is my protect target.
The query was
Also, your wincon is to protect somebody? Is that me?
You wonder why I prodded that with partial sarcasm? Think about it.
"Oh yes Toony, you're my protect target. I really did lie in saying you aren't."
>__>
I see.
I do mind my own death, but am unsure on the repercussions. General repercussions, as it would affect everyone involved. The cases against me..aren't understandable, really. Voting people because they're third-party? That's a run-off cause, and needs expounding. Those who are doing such aren't expounding but bringing in a can of spoiled worms: metaknowledge. If you'd like a point, Toaster speaks about third-parties and if they're benevolent, why aren't they town. I answered to my best knowledge why, but the real answer is if you'd ask the mod what he's thinking.
What do you see about the cases against me, ToonyMan? I detect the presence of that 'Even if' which comes off to me as you subtly inserting your doubt on those cases.
Uh well, Toaster is being lazy (I seem to remember them voting NQT for "almost certainly being third-party" and Vector is being even worse. Your ward on me could be seen as brownie points (buddying), but buddying one person wouldn't really save you. Toaster has the best case on you with more facts, Vector has the "off-feeling" bit that she used against me in the opposite manner, heh...I think she also said because you're third-party which would make sense.
I wouldn't vouch for your lynch right now though, I don't think you're a witch.
@Dariush:
@Dariush:
A more apt observation would be what are you going to do about it? How is placing my vote on Ottofar the same as him putting a vote on NQT a week ago?
Have anything else to say about the situation or are you disappointed your mislynch got fucked?
NQT is town because that's the impression I get off him. I don't see how his concerns are anything but benevolent, if awkward. He's participating far more than you are too. PPE: He also seems to be aware of the town wincon which Leafsnail is cursing at.
Why are you sticking with Ottofar so much? Why would you buddy your own scummate...
I was... of rather higher opinion of you before this post. Apparently, you're just another stupid self-important cretin.
1. It is completely identical: a vote on a lurker without any explanation other than to save NQT's ass.
2. Mislynch. So despite NQT being the embodiment of scumminess for the entire game and you not lifting a finger to dispute any part of my case you simply declare him a mislynch. Did he promise you a fu hug? Or maybe a win for your team?
3. His concerns? Like the part where he declared that Toaster would be guaranteed scum if NQT is lynched? Or maybe the part where he actually asked in huge bold font why we aren't voting Ottofar? Yep, totally benevolent and not intended to save his ass in no way whatsoever.
4. Sticking? Er, no. I don't give a fuck about Ottofar. What I do give a fuck about, however, is that the three scum have voted him for the laziest reason ever ('ermahgard hers luhkin') merely so one of them won't get lynched.
Also, I love how you jumped off Ottofar bandwagon (on which you still jumped for no reason) the moment NQT lost a vote. Deeefinitely a behaviour of someone who wishes to see scum dead.
Something I pointed out last time was your lack of content in your last post, and in your following post here you do the exact same thing. This is one of the largest reasons I voted Vector and now you're doing nothing but ignoring half of what I'm saying, every other player, and this game as a whole.
I'll repeat myself, but what are you contributing to the game?
Oh, that's an easy one. I already vigged two witches, saved a town cop by protecting him and made a scum-aligned third party lose. Didn't I? Oh wait, indeed I didn't, probably because it is D1 (which is being indefinitely extended by stupid fuckholes like you who are afraid of their little scumbuddy NQT getting lynched, but that's beside the point) and literally the only solid thing that happened so far was Tiruin more or less confirming herself to be third party. Thus, my contribution thus far amounts to voting someone I very strongly suspect to be scum and forming cases on several people I strongly to very strongly suspect of being scum.
Okay.
BTW, nice ignoring of absolutely everything I wrote in the previous post and FoSing me over the one thing I missed. Well, can't say I expected more from a waste of resources like you. Tell me, what are you contributing to the game? (note: defending NQT like he's your baby getting threatened with slow dismemberment doesn't count)
To be fair, you ignored NQT purposely. I'm not sure I need to bring into question what I'm contributing, it's self-evident.
Overall, I'm not sure at this point. If I assume Leafsnail is scum (which I'm heavily inclinded to do), that would light up NQT like a match, and I'd throw Zombie Urist and Lenglon in there for good measure as my scum picks. This is really ignoring Griffinpup, IronyOwl, and Okami though.
The other side I could see is NQT being town, which makes me see Toaster, Ottofar, and Dariush (and Okami but where are they??) in a worse light. I doubt it could fully be either of these.
None of these scenarios really count Tiruin since they're almost certainly third-party, and they seem to want to protect me so that's quite good in my favor.
For the time being though, I've decided to put my on vote on
Leafsnail. Even if we assume NQT is scum or town Leafsnail is still acting scummy and I'd like to see his full write-up he has planned.
Other worthy candidates for lynching:
Zombie Urist for his case on NQT and poking/jabbing playstyle.
Toaster and (mainly) Vector for opportunistic lynching and Vector is being a mess and using it as an excuse to not being voted which is bullshiiiiit.
Okami's case on NQT was bizarre and he hasn't been here.
Author
Topic: Witches' Coven: In the Heart of Darkness [GAME OVER: 4/13] (Read 204389 times)