Err, if it would mean much, I'd vouch for Vector on the emotional stuff there (unsure where the used-car salesman thing comes from but I won't poke it) but..Lenglon did have a point. The shift in tone did come off as if there was something wrong--mind you, this didn't mean anything in terms of alignment emotions, but it...just came off as something wrong.
But yeah, Vector's...troubled. :/
Take a rest for the moment Vector and say when you're ok. From what I know of Lenglon, she's not a bad person in touching those points and downplaying you as such.
@Tiruin:
You cast a ward on me? What exactly does that entail?
Also, your wincon is to protect somebody? Is that me? I don't like your "I don't mind getting lynched by the town" attitude, but your behavior is odd and contrary.
Ward: Protection from magic and other unholy devices. My use of the verb 'cast' in conjunction to it? Not needed, but just me stating 'I do (x) at you!', more of an 'I wonder what would people react to if I said "cast"'. Just like what a guardian angel would do.
Okay.
...And yes. Protect in the terms of 'I don't want you killed/slain/murdered/tainted/done in/kicking the bucket'.
"And no, I'm not saying who it is. Why are you asking me if I'd say who it is?"
Because I find it odd to cast a protect on somebody who isn't your protect target.
Two things wrong:
> I cast my protect on somebody who is my protect target.
> I don't cast my protect on somebody who is my protect target.
The query was
Also, your wincon is to protect somebody? Is that me?
You wonder why I prodded that with partial sarcasm? Think about it.
"Oh yes Toony, you're my protect target. I really did lie in saying you aren't.">__>
...Why don't you like that attitude? What I'm saying (mostly inferring) that I'm ok with the lynch--people get uppity about this lapse of information and go with their anything at times--but what I'm not ok with is the reasons behind the votes that precede said lynch.
Because a player not minding their own death doesn't make any sense at a game stand-point. Even if the cases against you were understandable why would you be okay with your own lynch? I've seen you self-vote yourself in the past and that holds the same tune.
...Ok. Schoolwork juggling + Mafia = not good english me.
I do mind my own death, but am unsure on the repercussions. General repercussions, as it would affect everyone involved. The cases against me..aren't understandable, really. Voting people because they're third-party? That's a run-off cause, and needs expounding. Those who are doing such aren't expounding but bringing in a can of spoiled worms: metaknowledge. If you'd like a point, Toaster speaks about third-parties and if they're benevolent, why aren't they town. I answered to my best knowledge why, but the real answer is if you'd ask the mod what he's thinking.
What do you see about the cases against me,
ToonyMan? I detect the presence of that 'Even if' which comes off to me as you subtly inserting your doubt on those cases.
Can you think out a GM at his own game? No. I'm only a piece of the puzzle.
But I think you're either misunderstanding me, or misunderstanding me intentionally for information... no I'm not self-voting myself. The context of that time was very muchly different from now. (and now I feel like you're a bit biased against me due to that) :I
ZUTiruin: What is the crux of your case on Toaster? Does your flavor say why you hate witchcraft? Why did you ward Toonyman?
I'm running on PFP time so I'll have to ask you to use your lurkertracker to spot my votes, specifically #20+ from memory, that's where I was poking on Toaster.
> He's using bad logic and metaknowledge to back up his vote.
> He's using spurious claims (that lie thing I pointed out? Yeah.) to back up his case on me.
> He's not being definite about his case on me, but rather use the fallacy of appealing to ignorance to prod at me.
> Wasting a vote on a third-party mainly because of said metaknowledge without explaining the context WHY he's doing so or why he's believing I claimed in the first place, but coming off from that tangent.
Flavor...doesn't state it specifically. I do know of the ailments of the land from what I heard from people, but did not exactly say I hate witchcraft "I hate what's going on here" pertaining to the current evils plaguing the lands and recent events is more like it.
And the last: He's the Viscount, is the most superficial thought that came to mind. And nobody claimed otherwise--will expound later.
I want your thoughts on this case though, as you commented before on third-parties and you weren't feeling safe after knowing what I said about myself.