IronyOwl: Quite confident, but I am a tad shaken by the lack of confirmation that I was either right or wrong. That said, I did not have any particular suspicions yet that hinged on me being right or wrong, so my plan for today is the same: back to the grindstone.
Book: I was under the impression that I was contributing more than I do when I lurk, but yes, I am still satisfied by my choice of Flandre for lynch. Of all the people available, she was the most likely to be scum in my opinion. My top pick for now isToaster for discussing safe lynches at length. TolyK is behaving extremely weirdly, but to the point where I don't believe he's weirdly behaving scum, but instead weirdly behaving someone who knows a lot about the setup and doesn't know whether/how to reveal it.
Urist I: You said you had a theory yesterday that you'd oh-so-kindly grace us with after the run phase. Care to tell us more?
TolyK: ... Vote for who you should protect? All that insures is that whoever we vote is guaranteed to live, the scum will still get a kill off anyways. What value would that give us? Where did your 'by luck' quote come from?
Toaster: Yes, we need to keep 'safe lynches' in mind if there are fewer than five anti-town. However, why are you being so insistent on compiling your list of safe lynches? What happened to your utter certainty that Urist I was scum yesterday? Do you really think 'safe lynches' are a good idea when we still know little about what's going on?