Sorry about the absence.
Dariush:Yes, I am the wizard. Yes, I killed Vector and Jim. Happy? Now, the catch - I asked LNCP and he directly replied that once I fulfill my win condition, the town won't need to lynch me any longer. Oh, and about that wincon...
If my NK's target is the golem (whom I desperately tried to lure out for the whole game), he becomes my ally, and I win. Not immediatly, for that I'd need to find the bracelet, which is definitely possessed by witches. If the witch that possesses it is lynched or killed, I'll need to wait until the natural end of the game. If the golem is lynched or killed, I lose.
I don't believe this at all. There's a number of reasons why, but the most obvious is "why would we think you're telling the truth
this time?"
More concretely, your kill pattern doesn't match someone who's not anti-town, nor does it match your claimed wincon. You knocked off the most experienced players first, and even admitted it was because you wanted easy-to-manipulate people around later in the game- yet, supposedly town has no reason to get rid of you and vice versa, and indeed you're
united in wanting to find witches. To top it all off, if all went well you wouldn't even be around late game, having fulfilled your wincon and bolted.
Furthermore, your inspect/kill pattern doesn't make much sense. If killing the wrong target
really screwed you over, presumably you'd inspect everyone as/before you killed them. Instead, there's only one overlap out of three. Logically, all these targets would also be the scummiest players, since you're looking for a golem and a witch- instead, they've been the best players, because you're looking to not get caught.
Finally, you'd have us believe that you have an awkward secondary wincon that bypasses everyone else's. Riiiight.
It isn't technically killing (since the primary purpose of the ritual is to enslave the golem, and if used on human it kills them as a side-effect, but no, I don't.
Also, this is just priceless. "Technically it's not killing, it's just a ritual that kills everything but one player that I use for killing."
Think/Jim:Reply from Jim, insult preserved:
I'll be nice and replace instances of "I" with "Jim," which still explains nothing. Why would you/the scumteam withhold such relevant information?
They didn't, you dumbshit.
How do you figure?
By the time you decided to pass this information along to Think for him to tell to us, you had the whole story- robes and rod, magical Dariush, column of light- but just gave us "Dariush was leaving Vector's."
Toaster:However, I can't help but point out you never actually denied being the third witch.
I'm not the third witch. I'm also not fond of stating the obvious.
Here's the thing- if the golem got here the same time all this started, how could he be impersonating an innkeeper? Investigating Simple's flavor indicated much that he's been innkeeping for quite some time. I'd think the golem would be someone that would have no strong ties to the town.
Not really. In theory the same ought to be true of all non-town, but it hasn't been for the witches, was lied about convincingly by Dariush, and supposedly is true of the pro-town Inquisitor.
Speaking of which, how is it that you're "Town-Aligned" but have a completely separate (albeit similar) wincon? Isn't the defenition of X-aligned that you win or lose with X?
Irony: Let me formalize it: Are you the golem? If not, who do you think is what role? If so, what is your wincon?
No. Currently leaning:
Dariush = Obvwizard
Flandre = Townie. If she's not dead tomorrow, likely the last witch. Faint chance of being golem, if it's the kill and replace sort and/or the witches were in cahoots with it for some reason.
Think = Witch or Witch-Ally. If Ally, Toaster is probably the last witch.
Toaster = Inquisitor, Witch, or Golem. Top suspect for Witch if Think isn't, first in line for golem for similar reasons; in either case, knew too much to not have an inspect. Normally I'd rule out the golem because of this, except Dariush appears to have both an inspect and kill, so evidently it's not impossible.
Simple = Anything. Was getting kind of a townie vibe off him, but his preference for flailing is making me wonder.
Simple:Toaster: If he's a golem i have no way of winning so i couldn't care less for this option. It seems unlikely due to inspect stuff(Why would he go around people homes AND kill others ?)
What do you mean by this?