Yup. That also falls into issues with ableism, Nadaka, which makes me wonder if that's why they usually make such a big deal of incidence rates of disabilities in men. It isn't just because men are inherently valued more (in certain ways--don't get me started on the draft, or "women and children first"), but because ability--especially ability to work, to provide, etc.--are more salient to a male gender role.
Actually, a lot of the problems we have in general with gender roles and gender issues are tied into this ability problem, which says more than I thought it did about our society. Hurm.
I remember that I was thinking about what it would be like to write a book about women from earlier eras, and going "But... what did women do back then, anyway? What would there be to write a book about? Hell, I'd rather write about a dude."
It's a bit of a mess, to say the least.
I've seen the occasional "that is not so bad", "men have it worse" or more often "men have it bad too" post here after a feminist issue, but 9 times out of 10, that does not happen (here at least). Not sure about other areas. It does come up occasionally simply due to the very large number of feminist issues brought up here. This isn't just a feminist thread though.
I feel like it's mostly been okay on that front, as well.
This was the largest blowup--indeed, the only real blowup we've had of the issue, other than minor arguments (like the mansplaining one, which is why I now add content warnings for that sort of thing so that people don't think I'm all for it or something). When I started letting people know I was linking to feminist polemics, people stopped writing knee-jerk defenses of themselves... so yeah, I think that although there were some little bumps in the beginning of the thread due to this stuff, it's gotten a lot smoother through time.