-
-
You've been accused of:
- buddying Pooka
- and... coaching Naturegirl?
Weird. Nevertheless those are both things you can (and probably should) respond to!
You're right tho. Now I look at my behavior this game, I've totally been avoiding actually scumhunting you. That is strange and I should not be doing it and I will try and amend the situation with some proper accusations. Just gimme awhile to go through your posts...
...while I'm doing that, though, answer me this: why do you want us to scumhunt you?
Pooka didn't phrase questions. I still don't see any suggestion that I should explain my behaviour. Their post wasn't even addressed to me.
That said, if you think I should respond:
I have been referring to Pooka's analysis because he is the one who posted the most in-depth mechanical analysis at the start.
I
didn't give naturegirl any slack (Pooka didn't just say I was coaching, everyone should be coaching newer players a bit) because I've seen a pattern in her behaviour this game (a pattern shared by IonMatrix) of giving a desultory response to encouragement to actually scumhunt, and then just switch back to passively answering questions. This time, I decided to try and nip this in the bud with a rant about scumhunting.
Why do I
want you to scumhunt me? Well, it's more that it's something you should be doing. I don't need more information about my own alignment, I know that I'm town. But everyone else in the town needs information about my alignment, and should be considering the possibility that I'm scum, and investigating me accordingly. D1 is your first chance to get info about people, and you can only do that D1 by pressuring them if you don't engage in role-reveal hijinks. So that we get info on every player, we ought to be pressuring every player.
I’m curious why you are encouraging Superdorf against searching for 2 scum teams
I have been encouraging Superdorf against searching for teams of two scum rather than single scum (I think this is what you meant? I'm going mostly by context, and what I see could be dubious in the posts you quoted) not just because there are a lot of 2-person combinations.
Having read 4mask's post above, I suspect I had an inchoate meta motive for it too, which is that with newer players, some people will be a bit more lenient to ease them into a very hard game, which might come across as scumbuddying. Case in point:
I have a longstanding policy of softballing new players on D1
Also I might do it a bit, and obviously have an instinctive aversion to the idea of appearing scummy, even though rationally this isn't wholly the way I should think as town. This is an element of my game I struggle with and try to control. I've responded badly to people asking fair questions in my previous games, and nearly been lynched as town because of it.
And thank
you for pressuring me on something when I mention that people should be doing it.
You do need to start questioning people's behaviour on your own initiative though. That's what most of the mafia daygame is, really, so you can never really be done with it until the game is over.
Right above
Yeah, this is fair. And thanks for making the thing about out-of-game logic explicit, it was helpful.
Hm. I think it's about time for me to start consolidating reads/cases. Should have had some questions for people today, but other stuff happens on weekends.