That was beautiful ;_;
"The goal is at hand, my dear. Fortunate enough it is for me to be near it--I see it; the squabbles and all the victory it entails, but what am I to it but a token?
"I may be a kitty cat, or probably a bear, but in both scenarios I have one goal. Survival. I see you're quite astute in picking that out and seeing my approach to them. I say you're coming along the lines of integrity and competence? Well, here, let me point out one thing.
"Spies are no different from townies in the way they act, or must act. They don't need to communicate with their allies; they don't need to communicate how or what their subtleties are. They just need to look like rebels enough. This is why I'm pouncing and taking every opportunity to watch and query. This is a game of communication more than anything else, and something I really enjoy.
"You can be a one man band, gain the trust of these people, and win the game by confounding your 'teammates', so to say. How to sift through who is sincere and who is malevolently scheming is the crux. This is the deal with my precision here. The mother can bring her cubs along, and protect them along the way so too as the cat can watch her prey die a slow, meaningless death as long as the wings are down. Strike alone, and strike surely.
"And yes that was better. I do enjoy your analogies. I'd like to ask where you saw my moodiness, however."
...Now let me get back to rereading >_<
If I missed any questions, do say.
why are you so hesitant to explain why you did that?
Hesitant is how you see it. I really don't see how you see I didn't answer on discussing why I voted as such. Seems like you're repeating things just to continue it, but that's just my busy-addled mind.
Here, I'm really bogged down by work and work and medical work..It is hell trying to get free time, and more hell to shift your mindset to a relaxation mode due to all the discussion about cells and their DNA. Anyway, I'm not hesitant to speak or explain 'about that' when I did explain those matters earlier.
Let me get links.
Week 2, Mission 2;
Addendum. Continuation.
Day 1: vote against team containing a scumteam member, gain townie points for when it fails. even as a spy you would'nt know that the other spy/spies is/are going to lie low. Day 2: same action, same plan. Day 3: (strongest evidence, the other two are pretty weak, and simply reinforce my theory) you vote up for a team containing two of the people that were on the failed mission, including NQT who is pretty much certainly a spy.
...This is you trying to explain my actions, right? Because you just stated something which indirectly aims to answer the question.
I really don't get how most of it makes sense. Day 1 [Dar's infallible team]--this purely depends on the situation that [The mission has 2 spies] and [IF it fails], the townie points have to be awarded after the defense of such, and not depending on the conjunctive FAIL/PASS. On that note, that really irked me on the tell of Strawman. What were you answering there?
Day 2 [NQT's Failure]--Same action, same plan? This really annoys me, especially the latter two words. You're assuming something on a huge note that you didn't bother asking me beforehand on the details--you did ask and comment on the vote pattern, but did not prod on the details, asking me on why I did such despite it being stated in the link above.
Day 3--the Upvote.
This is Birdy's last pertinent post. Thrice damn information. Redoing checking manually.
[
ZU: Your lurkertracker is broken. It did not track griffinpup's Last Vote. At all. Nor is it updated towards the current list of votes] But at least the posts remain counted. I'm pretty sure this isn't a browser based cache thing because of that.:/
The strikethrough is me typing my thoughts out before checking it all in and using those links for easy comparison.
The team.The Votes.> It lacked Remuthra, who was my foremost scumpick of the day due to his antics. The other two I had a fairly townish read going by process of elimination. What I can't get is how, in a woman of great intellect in language, can manage to word her sentence.
(strongest evidence, the other two are pretty weak, and simply reinforce my theory)
What other two? What theory?
That I voted up a team with NQT?
Two people who were on the failed team were NQT and griffinpup, both were vague at the time preceeding now. What you're poking at, and using as a fire poker here, is comparing now to before and judging my reasoning on those points? I don't see how that makes sense in marking me as scum.
Note that Remuthra voted, and refused to speak afterwards, hence forwarding my case on him. Which is pretty rude, really. [PS, I'm stuck with a bias against you because of what I really am still feeling against him. He
did not even voice his opinion on the team other than downvote it.]
Yes it is annoying me even as I reread.
I've to comment on the NQT is a most certain spy part? He picked the team along that point, yet I'm also seeing how he's being wishy-washy at the moment. The lack of links to his big slip annoys me, but I-
Oh. This?Hm, yeah.
I skimmed that part after reading the context, and judged it as something to think about later. People may say that's damnable evidence of scummitude, however I marked it under
metamarks. It makes sense that the spy team would cue signals on the line of that notion, and in this case it is damnable, however I'd stay ambivalent on that case as NQT hasn't responded yet. Will it matter, you ask? Yes it would.
Another thought in my head is the impression on the wording. It doesn't seem like he's subtly putting in a message but just in stating a general fact. If reasoning is true on that path, then there are actually 2 spies in the first team. (Which would mark Dariush as town, unless it would be hilarious to mark him as the scum teamlead, and then see him pick two under a RNG, then see them flail.)
However,
NQT. Why place that statement in your post? What was your intention behind it, and supposing you were a rebel, what use would it have served to everyone--those who read.
Lastly, I notice something in many of your posts. I've nothing to take but your word on the matter of you and your alter-ego being rebels. Why do you keep on pushing the comparison of the presence of a role and not pushing what your previous self has laid instead?
I see you did the reasoning on his..flailing back there, saying it was a town point (which I struggle to see, but not wholly disagree with), but what else can you say about him?
You did not
defend one thing.
I can, but that doesn't change the fact that I didn't want to go on the mission for the single reason that I could end up being written off as scum. I really have nothing whatsoever I can say to defend myself now besides "I told you it would happen". By definition, if I can't do anything to disprove your claims, either everyone has been told by the mod that I'm a spy, or a nice batch of WIFOM is being served.
Answer me, how does the bolded part make sense compared to what you
say here?