ok, skimmed the thread, still low on detail though, I don't have an emotional read on anyone yet, nor an evaluation of how anyone thinks. I'll try to get a bit farther with that tomorrow, but I have to sleep soon.
GriffPup: what part of "I haven't read the thread so I can't answer your question yet, but I will once I have." is a deflection?
now then, to explain past Me's actions:
Week 1 Team: NQT, Griffpup, Nerjin -> Success.
Week 2 Team: NQT, Griffpup, Nerjin, Past Me -> Fail.
if you make the foolish assumption that spies will sabotage every mission they're on, then this sequence of events marks past me as a spy. that assumption is wrong, but apparently when past me saw this happen, rather than actually try to handle it, she simply freaked out and gave up.
I would like to point out that such a reaction is actually a mark of town. if you assume that Past Me is a spy, then past me chose to sabotage the mission, singleing herself out for suspicion, and then broke down and fell apart under the lightest of pressure. If past me was a spy, then somehow Past Me was unprepared for suspicion, despite actively choosing to draw it to herself. a true spy would either have a defense ready or have not sabotaged the mission at all.
I only see how WIFOM comes peripherally into play in this situation. the only WIFOM involved was for the spy on the first team who chose to not sabotage the mission on week 1. even then, it doesn't apply very well.
Sheep: Like I said, I've only skimmed the thread, so you might have already answered this, but why did you vote down the team that failed week 2?
GriffPup: why did you vote up a team containing NQT and yourself when NQT was on the team that was sabotaged?
NQT: why did you vote up a team containing GriffPup and yourself when GriffPup was on the team that was sabotaged?
Tiruin: why did you downvote the first two teams, but upvote a team containing both NQT and GriffPup when they were both on the team that was sabotaged?