PPE: Oh God Wall Of Text
Tolyk: Why did you poison Sheep specifically? Did you have any other targets in mind? Why should we trust you not to get 3 people killed if you survive another night?
I already answered this, last post, didn't I? Quickly, though, hammer vote + misc. details.
I was going to pick between Tiruin, TWS, Ranger and Griff, but the last posts had me pick TWS over everyone else.
Although I didn't really want to say this until a bit later, I poisoned TheWetSheep last night due to that hammer vote (which felt really off).
But you're voting for him. Why would you vote for someone who you know is going to die?
We already know you're a poisoner, so why did you mention these things now and not sooner, TolyK?
I already said, I was trying to gauge his reaction to votes.
The best part was "I really hope you're a jester..." when he really should've been saying "I really hope you're scum"
Why that, TWS? No time for others to think? Meh.
Zombie Urist: I really hope you're not a jester. You're acting scummy enough, though.
This is the quote you're operating off of, in my understanding. This is... a really, really lazy misquote. If you were suspicious because of the hammer, why not mention that you were suspicious because of the hammer? Instead, you misquote and give information we later discover to be bad...
Yes, he said similar stuff before that, as well.
And that was a quick post. And people talked about the hammer right before that.
What information do we discover to be bad?
After all, you yourself said:
If he wasn't scummy enough to lynch, why were four other people voting him?
. . . After all, you seem to really enjoy bandwagoning.
Tolyk: Forgive me if I'm understand wrong, but does your antidote need to be re-applied every day? You mentioned giving it to TWS and NQT today.
Yes, I thought that I mentioned that and/or it would be "obvious" from my wording.
Some older things:
Anyway, he's what I understand of an arsonist since I've never played one:
> Marks targets at night. (Prime)
> Has the choice to set em flame at day - killing them.
> All from BM-linked, flash Mafia. (Extended roles link, I cannot access due to Comodo hailing the link-site as dangerous :/...But that's what my memory can recall about them) so I tried Xylbot's list.
Arsonist (sk; common; 4+ players): You can prime a player at night by dousing them in gasoline. During the day, you may set a fire which kills all primed players. Actions: prime (day)ignite
Out of all things, he statistically guesses a scum arsonist.
So its me thinking TolyK = arsonist or something along that line (because I've never, ever heard of a friendly poisoner. WHo poisons people and threatens them with blackmail anyway!? 'I'm scumhunting NQT because I can kill him. Your life is in my hands' - and all. His reasoning is short and choppy, making me ask him again - and now amend the question below.)
Well, this makes sense, from a logical point of view.
Because I thought about it...and TolyK rings third-party in my eyes. Regarding that poisoning, and more on confirming NQT but the thinking stands -- Why would NQT have a lovers anti-kill, if he was scum/third-party. Why indeed was his powers tailored to the specifications of comm-channels, and him loving Ford? He was confirmed town (or as confirmed as that reasoning can be in my eyes) already.
Hint hint: He was weakly-confirmed the second day, while I poisoned him the first night.
The only benefit to this is him being a vigilante OR that poison thing being a one-shot. Checking the above (answer to my question) and any wording whereelse, I detect nothing on it being a one-shot, or any subtle implication of it being such. He did answer him being a vigilante-type. What makes me doubt this is that we've already had an SK: UI. Of which his status as Grand Wizard pokes at me hoping we aren't dealing with a blasted cult than anything, and KKK standing for a rebellion group rather than...err, your western acronym of KKK but I'd not want to delve deeper into game mechanics considering that we've no roleflips at all.
Nothing really to say to this, it works, I guess.
TolyK, in addition to the questions asked to you today, why exactly did you want to confirm NQT out of everyone else? Did you poison someone else N1? If so, why aren't you doing the same thing you did to NQT there?
1) He did the strange lovers thing D1, so I wanted to be fairly sure he's town and is going in our interests.
2) I would, if I weren't being asked lotsa questions.
Why are you curious about whether or not someone actioned you last night or not - and query on your poisoner ability: One shot? What is that action you've to claim to day that you're disputing it with yourself because its...silly? You keep on promising more posts yet you're late to deliver them -- you've even waiting D2 just only for NQT for a period of time there. What in the world.
I think I answered this, it's because I wanted to see if anyone redirected me, so that I knew who to save.
His blatant misuse and overuse of the doesn't help at all. Irks me along the side of 'haha, I'm lighthearted and stuff' like its...used as a passing wave to justify his posts. Argh I dunno. just look at how he uses the Its used in a comical way -- I can't find the word for it! Its like a cover up.
And I'm the one who abuses smileys around here...
Sorry, just me.
It might be good for me to put up an FAQ a la NQT...
Claim/FAQNight - Poison - Poisons target, dies at end of next day.
Day (multiple per phase) - Antidote - Extends person's life by a night and a day.
- One More Ability
Q: Can't scum just kill you and, with you, two (or even 3, if lovers) more people?A: Nope, I made sure before the end of N1.
Q: Do you plan on actually killing people?A: NQT - no. TWS - depending on how scummy I and other people think he is.
Q: Will you poison next night?A: I don't know yet, probably not, unless someone does something really silly today.
Q: Are you out of your mind?A: Maybe, but I don't think so.