PFP - still in exam mode so I may be missing a lot since D1.
That, and I'm splitting this post.
Tiruin:
...So you were a double voter, huh.
Coincidence in flavor?
There are no coincidences in the flavour, only things that have yet to make sense to us yet. (No seriously, even cases like UI: go read the opening if you disagree.)
TolyK:
I assume the fact that NQT is still alive means you antidoted him?
Thinking about the ability pair you have (poison and antidote) would you consider yourself a vigilante type of role? Does your antidote allow you to multi-target or did you decide not to target again last night?
Basically, yes. It's probably better than a vigilante in that I can save folks if I want to.
I can multi-target, yes.
Now that sounds more like an arsonist because its a timed choice than not, TolyK, it doesn't answer the bolded question.
Actually he DID answer that question; his response is in your quote. Why are you voting to lynch our friendly neighborhood poisoner, Tiruin?
...You know he's friendly, how? Spiderman reference? O_o
Anyway, he's what I understand of an arsonist since I've never played one:
> Marks targets at night. (Prime)
> Has the choice to set em flame at day - killing them.
> All from BM-linked, flash Mafia. (Extended roles link, I cannot access due to Comodo hailing the link-site as dangerous :/...But that's what my memory can recall about them) so I tried Xylbot's list.
Arsonist (sk; common; 4+ players): You can prime a player at night by dousing them in gasoline. During the day, you may set a fire which kills all primed players. Actions: prime (day)ignite
Out of all things, he statistically guesses a scum
arsonist.So its me thinking TolyK = arsonist or something along that line (because I've never,
ever heard of a friendly poisoner. WHo poisons people and threatens them with blackmail anyway!? 'I'm scumhunting NQT because I can kill him. Your life is in my hands' - and all.
His reasoning is short and choppy, making me ask him again - and now amend the question below.)
Because I thought about it...and TolyK rings third-party in my eyes.
Regarding that poisoning,
and more on confirming NQT but the thinking stands -- Why would NQT have a lovers anti-kill, if he was scum/third-party. Why indeed was his powers tailored to the specifications of comm-channels, and him loving Ford? He was confirmed town (or as confirmed as that reasoning can be in my eyes) already.
The only benefit to this is him being a vigilante OR that poison thing being a one-shot. Checking the above (answer to my question) and any wording whereelse, I detect nothing on it being a one-shot, or any subtle implication of it being such. He did answer him being a vigilante-type. What makes me doubt this is that we've already had an SK: UI. Of which his status as Grand Wizard pokes at me hoping we aren't dealing with a blasted cult than anything, and KKK standing for a rebellion group rather than...err, your western acronym of KKK but I'd not want to delve deeper into game mechanics considering that we've no roleflips at all.
TolyK, in addition to the questions asked to you today, why
exactly did you want to confirm NQT out of everyone else? Did you poison someone else N1? If so, why aren't you doing the same thing you did to NQT there?
...And now that I re-read TolyK's post again,
...So lets see if i can wrap my head around all the actions that are so far confirmed:
Day 1: NQT puts lovers on 2 players who have also gained a chat. (later claimed they were both who he thought were town) We lynch Ford who shows up town (Ford's lynch also prevents NQT from voting).
Night 1: No kill takes place but Tolyk claims to have poisoned NQT. (one maybe two blocked kills (if SK had a kill)
Day 2: I day inspect NQT and find him town as well as craft a lie to confirm some of his abilities. (possible tampering) Hapah claims truth inspect on Toaster saying he's town. Web mod kills Zrk(mafia), UI(SK), and Soldier(town). We lynch ZU who flips town.
Night 2: Tolyk gives NQT an antidote and the kill(s) are blocked once again.
We're down to 9 players and i suspect atleast 2 more scum. If no extra kills happen and NKs begin showing up, we have 3 more days.
More in a bit, i have some digging to do. (will be around for the next 2-3 hours)
Seems fairly reasonable...
The problem is, I'm 80% sure the scum have an arsonist or something like that. Fire mage + alcohol mage perchance?
And I would also like to inform that TheWetSheep is now under my suspicion.
The best part was "I really hope you're a jester..." when he really should've been saying "I really hope you're scum"
Why that, TWS? No time for others to think? Meh.
I have my action to claim today, but it would be silly, likely.
Apart from that, did Anyone action me last night? Kinda curious...
Why are you curious about whether or not someone actioned you last night or not - and
query on your poisoner ability: One shot? What is that action you've to claim to day that you're disputing it with yourself because its...silly? You keep on promising more posts yet you're late to deliver them -- you've even waiting D2 just only for NQT for a period of time there. What in the world.His blatant misuse and overuse of the
doesn't help at all. Irks me along the side of 'haha, I'm lighthearted and stuff' like its...used as a passing wave to justify his posts. Argh I dunno. just look at how he uses the
Its used in a comical way -- I can't find the word for it! Its like a cover up.
And I'm the one who abuses smileys around here...
The status below has what I pertinent info I see exist (didn't delve through the thread long enough though, busy on that exams...):
Toaster - confirmed town via Hapah
notquitethere - Lover's Arrow (used); Immune to Lover-instigated NKs|| Is currently poisoned by TolyK.
Vector
Hapah - Had a truth-inspect (used) [1s]
Tiruin
Griffonday
TheWetSheep - Immune-night action-thing (used) [1s]; Double Voter
TolyK - Poisoner-type and other stuff said above
RangerCado - 'Used' a
redirect-swapper on Vector/NQT D3
What's confusing me though, is why (at near day end times) did NQT/RANGER are both worried about living when presented near lynch. Yeah, we've got
nothing as a roleflip but the alignment - NQT @D1, Ranger at...well, whenever he's near the Hammer.
Seriously guys?
@Both of you: Did you consider doing anything else but talk about how precious your skins are at that time?
Why I voted ZU?
Things. Checking back on D2, he...made quite a mess, TBH - the use of misusing terminology and the process in which he understood things were hard to understand. A tipping point (scumpoints) was
here. The only safe note (townie points) was on his blatant "Zrk was voting Tiruin
so..."
Because really. For that reason, purely? Then an added note of 'I'll check up on bussing soon.' Really made my view of 'Yeah ur scum
' to 'Wait what
' Because compared to his first posts regarding me - this was weak; weak in the way that no scum in my best logical belief in that situation would use reasons as superficial as that to get a vote off a person. Then the townie points dropped when I read him voting
Griff...for the scumpoints stated above.
I believed he worked through a relationist scumhunting viewpoint given how he promised to look...back, at things.