Mormota, if you were townie and it looked as if you were about to get lynched, would you claim a role? (lol)
No, no, no, NO. This is not how things are done. The only time joke questions like this are accepted is when they are sandwiched between actual useful (or at least as useful as RVS question get) questions at the start of the game.
You act as if that was my only post so far. Hell, you're making it seem like that was the only purposeful thing I put in that post. Is it a crime to throw in a joke after answering questions directed at you? And is it even more of a crime when the aforementioned joke actually serves a purpose? Way to misrep me. My eye = on you.
I'm trying to teach you what would and wouldn't get your sorry ass lynched, you halfwit. Jokes themselves are okay if you're considerate while dispatching them, but if you address someone while joking it means that you're expecting an answer. Do you see the problem with answering joke questions?
Mormota, don't ignore me.
1, Stop getting personal, you're an IC FFS! If you want to teach people, you're doing it wrong.
2, You could've bothered to repost your question so I wouldn't have to search for it, given I missed it originally. (That's because I checked the thread from my phone but did not post, so I only ran through the posts before posting.)
Why would I protect randomly when I can save not only the most useful player but also the likeliest one to be attacked? What are you getting at with those questions, Mormota?
When I was mafia last game, our IC told us not to kill an IC N1, because 1, that would ruin the purpose of the BM if the IC couldn't lead by example and 2, He's most likely to receive protection.
Of course, this can lead to WIFOM, but you know for pretty much a fact that the IC won't get killed, so you can direct your protection elsewhere. And now comes the surprise, Watson: I ask questions to get answers. It's surprising, I know.
Mormota: Answer to first question: Yes I have found people suspicious. Specifically, Andrew based on his actions and questions beforehand. The reason i'm still asking around? If I am wrong and he justifies himself, I can still take an instant lead on someone based on their answers to my questions now.
I think you could just look around
then.
Second question: Why wouldn't I? If I could find out who the Roleblocker or Godfather are, it would help us townies find scum.
Because it would help you if 7 people said they like being roleblocker or godfather. No, it would not help anyone. We would not gain anything from that information. But for scum, they have to choose a NK target. Who can they choose? Someone who is good at scumhunting, or perhaps someone who has a town role. Just know this: Rolefishing is scummy. Period. Rolefishing for scum roles is called scum-hunting.
And a question to you: What are your suspicions on Andrew?
I could just pull a Dariush and say: My suspicion is that he's scum.
But I know that's not what you meant. Just to point out the most recent of Andrew's suspicious actions, he straight-out lied. Town does not want to incriminate other people, scum do. Yes Andrew, I'm calling you scum.
Then you, ansontan. You asked a very similar question once, that's fine. But after you knew I found it suspicious, whether validly or not, you could not come up with anything else. How so? And now you're back to asking random questions.
Let me return to your first point here.
Mormota: Answer to first question: Yes I have found people suspicious. Specifically, Andrew based on his actions and questions beforehand. The reason i'm still asking around? If I am wrong and he justifies himself, I can still take an instant lead on someone based on their answers to my questions now.
If you find Andrew suspicious, why do you not ask
him a question? And why do you ask about my suspicions on Andrew, if you share them?