Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 198 199 [200] 201 202 ... 297

Author Topic: Occupying Wallstreet  (Read 297298 times)

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2985 on: April 15, 2012, 10:40:07 am »

mainiac: they don't actually get money from the government, right? It's just like, theorical, and they effectively have a 0% tax rate. Right?
Two words: tax refunds.

Just to explicitly clarify, yes they can indeed get money from the government.
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2986 on: April 15, 2012, 11:17:14 am »

So those corporations are actually paid billions by the government? I just don't get it. It's so... absurd.
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2987 on: April 15, 2012, 11:35:18 am »

Well we as a nation have decided that there are things that we want to subsidize.  We've decided to subsidize R+D.  We've decided to subsidize employer sponsored healthcare.  We've decided to subsidize investment in capital investment in durable goods, buildings and other infrastructures.  We've decided to subsidize exploratory oil drilling.  The list goes on and on.  And what does subsidizing mean?  It means that you give money to the people who do it.  This money takes the form of tax rebates.

Some companies do a lot of the things that we've decided to subsidize.  So much in fact that their subsidies are greater then their tax burden.  So they get a check from the government.  It's honestly not that absurd.  We just are trying to subsidize every damn thing with tax credits.  What is absurd is that we are using government subsidies for things that the government would do itself if it weren't for all the "free market" lower government spending at all cost advocates in congress.

When politicians like Obama talk about revenue neutral corporate tax reform, they're talking about ending or reducing these subsidies and using those savings to reduce the corporate tax rate.
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2988 on: April 15, 2012, 11:37:14 am »

Basically, subsidies are how American politicians keep the country from imploding when anything directly government-backed gets shot down by the "socialist" stigma.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2989 on: April 15, 2012, 11:40:36 am »

Basically, subsidies are how American politicians keep the country from imploding when anything directly government-backed gets shot down by the "socialist" stigma.

More or less.  But we use them even when we shouldn't.  Two of the largest tax subsidies in our tax code are subsidies for home mortgages and employer sponsored mortgages.  It doesn't take a genius to understand that underinvestment in residential real estate and employer sponsored healthcare are the least of our worries.
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

Mr. Palau

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2990 on: April 15, 2012, 05:57:16 pm »

Those dollar values are so small. How are you supposed to buy people with so little money?

I imagine it adds up.  This is a small list of only companies that paid no taxes.  Its focus isn't really on the political donations, but on the imbalance of paying no taxes while enjoying such huge profits.

On a quick search, the total amount spent on lobbying last year was $3.31 billion.
why is there a debate over the buffet rule when Warren could clearly just buy the government for the next 13 or so years?

I have this image in my mind of the capitial building with a sign on the lawn that says "For Sale, 3,310,000,000$"

Which is at the same time such a huge amount and such a tiny amount.  We could ban all political contributions and give all viable candidates enough public financing to make up the difference and it would be a drop in the bucket for the federal budget.
Yeah. Then there is bribes though, but those are much less effective and much more overt, illegal, and immoral.
Logged
you can't just go up to people and get laid.

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2991 on: April 15, 2012, 06:18:17 pm »

Warren Buffet's net worth is only around 45 billion.  The federal budget is like 3600 billion IIRC.

Also, voluntary donations make a really bad revenue stream for governments.  What happens when the rich people want the government to change some policy?
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

Mr. Palau

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2992 on: April 15, 2012, 06:53:03 pm »

Warren Buffet's net worth is only around 45 billion.  The federal budget is like 3600 billion IIRC.

Also, voluntary donations make a really bad revenue stream for governments.  What happens when the rich people want the government to change some policy?
No I meant as in Warren buffet could pay the campagian contributions, and then get the government to do whatever he want it do for 12 years.  Not finance the governmnet through donations.
Logged
you can't just go up to people and get laid.

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2993 on: April 16, 2012, 02:09:10 am »

Not that the Occupy movement itself ever went away, but it's been too long since I posted anything relevant to what's going on...

Occupy Wall Street — for Real This Time
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

Lagslayer

  • Bay Watcher
  • stand-up philosopher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2994 on: April 16, 2012, 09:00:32 am »

Warren Buffet's net worth is only around 45 billion.  The federal budget is like 3600 billion IIRC.

Also, voluntary donations make a really bad revenue stream for governments.  What happens when the rich people want the government to change some policy?
No I meant as in Warren buffet could pay the campagian contributions, and then get the government to do whatever he want it do for 12 years.  Not finance the governmnet through donations.
But what is the real issue here? The people donating their money or the people that are so easily corrupted by the donations?

Frajic

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2995 on: April 16, 2012, 09:12:09 am »

Warren Buffet's net worth is only around 45 billion.  The federal budget is like 3600 billion IIRC.

Also, voluntary donations make a really bad revenue stream for governments.  What happens when the rich people want the government to change some policy?
No I meant as in Warren buffet could pay the campagian contributions, and then get the government to do whatever he want it do for 12 years.  Not finance the governmnet through donations.
But what is the real issue here? The people donating their money or the people that are so easily corrupted by the donations?
The system that makes them depend on the goodwill of the rich.
Logged
EoS company name: Vikings Inc.

mainiac

  • Bay Watcher
  • Na vazeal kwah-kai
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2996 on: April 16, 2012, 10:29:16 am »

The issue is that so much is wrong we don't know what to be mad at first.
Logged
Ancient Babylonian god of RAEG
--------------
[CAN_INTERNET]
[PREFSTRING:google]
"Don't tell me what you value. Show me your budget and I will tell you what you value"
« Last Edit: February 10, 1988, 03:27:23 pm by UR MOM »
mainiac is always a little sarcastic, at least.

Lagslayer

  • Bay Watcher
  • stand-up philosopher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2997 on: April 16, 2012, 10:32:05 am »

Well, what does everything have in common?

sluissa

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2998 on: April 16, 2012, 10:34:12 am »

Human beings. Therefore, we know what to do...

EDIT: Or is that "people." I'm not sure anymore.
Logged

Mr. Palau

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Occupying Wallstreet
« Reply #2999 on: April 16, 2012, 05:11:21 pm »

Human beings. Therefore, we know what to do...

EDIT: Or is that "people." I'm not sure anymore.
The Time of Meat is Ending!
Not that the Occupy movement itself ever went away, but it's been too long since I posted anything relevant to what's going on...

Occupy Wall Street — for Real This Time
Warren Buffet's net worth is only around 45 billion.  The federal budget is like 3600 billion IIRC.

Also, voluntary donations make a really bad revenue stream for governments.  What happens when the rich people want the government to change some policy?
No I meant as in Warren buffet could pay the campagian contributions, and then get the government to do whatever he want it do for 12 years.  Not finance the governmnet through donations.
But what is the real issue here? The people donating their money or the people that are so easily corrupted by the donations?
Sortition is the only solution!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sortition
(read some of article before reading so you know what I mean)
Some form of special selection is required. Like diffrent committies that have diffrent powers governing diffrent subjects and are formed of members knowledgable on those subjects elected through Sortition. Education committie is made up of half parents and half teachers. Nuclear regulatory committie is made up of nuclear engineers, and anti nuclear activists, the latter is really only there to try and point out stupid things being done by the former.
Logged
you can't just go up to people and get laid.
Pages: 1 ... 198 199 [200] 201 202 ... 297