Rawr is dead, Jim Org.
Random vote. Nothing to say about this.
Jim: No.
Toaster: Least want on my team? abculatter and Bandages, probably. They're the least experienced.
Three pages later. But of course my last attempt here at stirring up scum with time-between-posts failed pretty dramatically.
Of course, you're not the same person. And you've been pretty consistently non-consistent.
God damn it ToonyMan, you've got enough of a train on your ass that I didn't want to vote you for pressure, but you honestly deserve it. That last post was deflection and a passive "attack" on Bandages. Get your shit together or die, dude.
Oh, now THIS is interesting. Third post in the entire game. Page 14 for those without screwed up page counting systems. That’s five posts since the last time.
And only to bandwagon.
Scum.
Jokerman-EXE: I don't recall you saying anything in a while. What are your suspicions at the moment?
Been watching you and Bandages go at it. At first it seemed like Bandages was being pretty damn scummy, but as it went along I sort of see him more as a newbie and less as obvscum.
This new thing with Bayer/Org bears watching, but other than that I don't have any major suspicions.
Mr.Person, I might have missed it but who do you think is scummier out of Jim/Bandages?
Next time - pages later, yet again - you come in with absolutely nothing. A few suspicions. Haven’t voted here. Haven’t done much of anything. No attacks. One question.
Yup, I’m on to something.
And I'm going to put my vote on abculatter_2 for the same reason. He hasn't been here posting or doing anything useful. While it's not much, I've been watching the exchanges back and forth for scumtells.
Sometimes I just forget that I'm also playing. >.>
When you do come back, it’s to do what you yourself admit is bandwagoning. While admitting it is somewhat noble, doing it isn’t. So, uh. Hard to defend you on this one.
(Take note that this is another few pages in.)
He's not doing the same thing as I am. I, at least, have been watching the game and making my own observations. Being new to mafia isn't an excuse at all. I got lynched my first couple games for the same reason.
When your inactivity is pointed out, you get defensive.
What observations? Someone asks.
I've been available less than you seem to think, which I should probably point out to you. I have time to check on my phone sometimes, but I'm not about too often.
Org is being really freakin' weird and acting almost like a Jester. He might have lost his vote but that's not reason to act like a disturbance. It actually makes me hesitant to say we should kill him.
Mr.Person is being ohmyfreakinggod so goddam verbose. I've never seen so much writing from one person before. Maybe a scumtell, or maybe he's just really excited this round. Hard to tell. I don't want to say he's scum yet, but by no means do I think he's clear.
SirBayer seems to me like he's being intentionally abrasive and trying to get a rise out of someone. While this can look like scumhunting, it seems more to me like he's trying to find a way to pin tells on someone.
Not sure what to think of Toaster, though he seems less scummy. There hasn't really been enough to read off of anyone else.
You reply with WIFOM, accuse Mr. Person of
talking too much of all things, and then come at me for scumhunting Mr. Person. Well, that all seems like plenty acceptable observations!
What Night Kill?
You then feel the need to reply to a stupid question. Gotta make sure every base is covered. Can’t let them catch the scum!
You. You’re the scum.
And I'm going to put my vote on abculatter_2 for the same reason. He hasn't been here posting or doing anything useful. While it's not much, I've been watching the exchanges back and forth for scumtells.
Sometimes I just forget that I'm also playing. >.>
So why did you voteacullater_2 over Pandarsenic?
Pandarsenic is always a major lurker. It's hard to read his meta in this case because he's virtually has no meta. He just...lurks.
Org is being really freakin' weird and acting almost like a Jester. He might have lost his vote but that's not reason to act like a disturbance. It actually makes me hesitant to say we should kill him.
Scum #2, hello! Did you really just defend Org by saying he could be a fucking jester? Seriously? Ok, let's think about this for a second. Why bother ever lynching since ANYBODY could be a jester? Let's lynch the players that appear to be townies and ignore scummy players! What harm could come from this?
Oh God, you're mistaken. By no means am I defending Org; he's near the top of my picks for who to lynch. I'm saying that the whole situation is really jacked up with him and I see it as a choice: try to deal with that whole huge mess that is Org, or come back to it later after I feel I've hunted other scum down.
So why did you say this again? Do you think Org is a jester? You never said you thought Org is a jester. Oh, and it's a well known fact Webadict hates jesters. Pretty much all the major mods do. Even BYOR's have had a jester in them only once, and they're known for being silly.
I'm not sure what Org is, so I don't want to try and get into it. As to why I said all this, it's because I was asked for an analysis of the players.
Mr.Person is being ohmyfreakinggod so goddam verbose. I've never seen so much writing from one person before. Maybe a scumtell, or maybe he's just really excited this round. Hard to tell. I don't want to say he's scum yet, but by no means do I think he's clear.
Being verbose would be a hilariously bad scumtell since you'd be lynching me for doing what everybody's supposed to be doing. But hey, whatever. Ignore me and try and find cookie-cutter scumtells. Ignore the fact that different players have different scumtells. Ignore context. Ignore the content of my posts like my thoughts and actions. Ignore that shit, you've gotta find the scumtells!
And either way, this post was totally useless. You just say "Mr.Person could be scum since he's talking". What purpose does this serve? The only thing I can think of is getting other people to think I'm scum.. but you didn't say you thought I was scum. You said I might be scum. So you're being passive, very scummy of you.
Okay, why are you being so defensive? At no point did I accuse you of being scummy for talking or anything. You're blowing it extremely out of proportion which, as far as I'm concerned, is the scummiest thing you've done so far. Someone asked me what I thought of the current players, and I thought you talked a lot. Period. You're the one turning this into a thing.
SirBayer seems to me like he's being intentionally abrasive and trying to get a rise out of someone. While this can look like scumhunting, it seems more to me like he's trying to find a way to pin tells on someone.
Yeah, being abrasive is his scumhunting tactic. So he's pressure voting? Yeah, how is this scummy again?
This isn't how I've seen him play typically.
Responses are bolded. And if it makes you feel better, I have been reading your posts pretty closely. So uh, don't think nobody's reading 'em.
And when someone points out all this nonsense, you immediately,
again, get super defensive. Throw up the earthworks! Cast off the attacks! HOLD FOR SIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEGE!
Yeah, no. That’s what scum do. Or rather, that’s what ScumIosephStalin does.
Please also note the sudden density only when the lurking is pointed out. That is also important. Three posts in two pages. You’ve had a
fractional post-to-page ratio for pages 5-20, where it starts. Care to explain that one?