Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 49

Author Topic: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Game Over!  (Read 58456 times)

Org

  • Bay Watcher
  • Daring Hero
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 1 - *Replacement requested*
« Reply #405 on: May 27, 2010, 12:50:53 pm »

Now, you can't really read into a game you haven't played.
...What is that supposed to mean?
Yeah. That was bad.

You can't read into a player when you haven't played with them.
Logged

Lonewolf I

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 1 - *Replacement found*
« Reply #406 on: May 27, 2010, 01:43:33 pm »

To goad Org into responding. I'll switch my vote to ToonyMan before the day ends if nothing happens to change my opinion.

You're not going to get a genuine reaction from someone if you see you are voting them for a reaction.

Can you show me where I haven't been attacking?  Because I remember attacking people.

I could care less about the reaction being genuine.  A reaction of some sort is all I wanted.

Where you haven't been attacking:
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
This entire time you've been activelurking to a ridiculous degree.  The one or two instances where you actually pretend to scumhunt are provoked, and lack any kind of proof.

So then, what mistakes did you think Ethereal.Frog made, and how would you have done things differently, Mr. Wolfrog I?

This quote from Janus effectively sums up the mistakes he made. As an added bonus, he tossed in a summary of my reasons for suspecting Org at the end.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)

Looks to me like most of his mistakes stem from apathy and newbishness. I think he really did just give up and walk away.

Now, you can't really read into a game you haven't played.
...What is that supposed to mean?
Yeah. That was bad.

You can't read into a player when you haven't played with them.

And this definitely qualifies as some sort of reaction.  Org, you are now my number two choice for scum.  Rather than questioning my ability to read into things, how about we start seeing some results from your own.  It's fine that you suspect Webadict of being the Exterminator. In fact, I agree with you on that. However, hunting him to the exclusion of all else makes it look, to me, like you're covering for your scumbuddies.
Logged

ToonyMan

  • Bay Watcher
  • Danger Magnet
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 2 *Replacement Found*
« Reply #407 on: May 27, 2010, 01:59:05 pm »

I began fresh with a RV on Leafsnail, then genuinely attacked Ottofar yesterday, and then voted Forsaken because he was acting more scummy than Ottofar.

Today I began fresh with Leafsnail and worked from there with still Leafsnail and now you.

A reaction of some sort?  Every question you ask is going to get a reaction of some sort, you aren't going to get what you want if you go accept anything!  That just makes it sound like you just want to pad your way through the day oh I don't know active lurking.  You accused me of being passive by making a list and you make the exact same thing in the post above me!

For my attacks that lack "proof" which is preposterous in the first place, I don't have concrete proof!  Unless you know something that I don't know I attack people the way they act or behave.  I don't make up something which makes no sense or make up concrete proof by lying.

You going to stop being a hypocrite scum and stop your passivity and active lurking so far?
Logged

ToonyMan

  • Bay Watcher
  • Danger Magnet
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 2 *Replacement Found*
« Reply #408 on: May 27, 2010, 02:00:54 pm »

Unvote.  Vote Lonewolf I.
Logged

Lonewolf I

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 2 *Replacement Found*
« Reply #409 on: May 27, 2010, 02:05:27 pm »

So then, what mistakes did you think Ethereal.Frog made, and how would you have done things differently, Mr. Wolfrog I?

Forgot to answer that last part. Sorry.  I'd have recreated the thoughtful post, or, better yet, written it in Notepad.  I think I'd have paid attention to the Ottofar/Webadict conflict, and ultimately side with Webadict.  I did not see anything suspicious about Jim when I was reading the early posts. You would never see anything like his last post out of me.  That was just plain stupid.  I suppose I should count myself fortunate that you all jumped Forsaken and forgot about him, even though it ended in a Townie lynch.  As far as what I would have done during the time he was absent, I would have been working my own scumhunt, and would likely have joined in lynching Forsaken if it yielded no fruit.  I didn't get any real suspicions of my own until the first few pages of day two when I read through the thread.
Logged

ToonyMan

  • Bay Watcher
  • Danger Magnet
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 2 *Replacement Found*
« Reply #410 on: May 27, 2010, 02:06:27 pm »

You are ignoring me scum.
Logged

Lonewolf I

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 2 *Replacement Found*
« Reply #411 on: May 27, 2010, 02:19:41 pm »

A reaction of some sort?  Every question you ask is going to get a reaction of some sort, you aren't going to get what you want if you go accept anything!  That just makes it sound like you just want to pad your way through the day oh I don't know active lurking.  You accused me of being passive by making a list and you make the exact same thing in the post above me!

For my attacks that lack "proof" which is preposterous in the first place, I don't have concrete proof!  Unless you know something that I don't know I attack people the way they act or behave.  I don't make up something which makes no sense or make up concrete proof by lying.

You going to stop being a hypocrite scum and stop your passivity and active lurking so far?
Concrete proof?  I expect nothing concrete at this phase.  You make claims but fail to provide the supporting logic, or at least indicate where your ideas are coming from.  This is what I mean by proof.

I have yet to see you attack someone outright.  You waited for someone else to attack you, and you've been defending yourself ever since.  I haven't seen a single instance of you taking initiative and leading the charge against your own suspected scum without provocation.
Logged

Org

  • Bay Watcher
  • Daring Hero
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 2 *Replacement Found*
« Reply #412 on: May 27, 2010, 02:33:26 pm »

What.
You dont want to go after someone YOU THINK IS AN EXTERM.?
Logged

ToonyMan

  • Bay Watcher
  • Danger Magnet
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 2 *Replacement Found*
« Reply #413 on: May 27, 2010, 02:34:00 pm »

A reaction of some sort?  Every question you ask is going to get a reaction of some sort, you aren't going to get what you want if you go accept anything!  That just makes it sound like you just want to pad your way through the day oh I don't know active lurking.  You accused me of being passive by making a list and you make the exact same thing in the post above me!

For my attacks that lack "proof" which is preposterous in the first place, I don't have concrete proof!  Unless you know something that I don't know I attack people the way they act or behave.  I don't make up something which makes no sense or make up concrete proof by lying.

You going to stop being a hypocrite scum and stop your passivity and active lurking so far?
Concrete proof?  I expect nothing concrete at this phase.  You make claims but fail to provide the supporting logic, or at least indicate where your ideas are coming from.  This is what I mean by proof.

I have yet to see you attack someone outright.  You waited for someone else to attack you, and you've been defending yourself ever since.  I haven't seen a single instance of you taking initiative and leading the charge against your own suspected scum without provocation.

You should look better because I have.  You see here I like to keep a balance between attacking and defending so I don't end up "everyone ignores you Webadict" aggressive or "scummy" defensive or whatever.

Yeah, if it's not concrete proof then it must be from judging what others say, I don't see why you had to fix yourself with that, it makes no sense!  I support my accusations the best I can, but it's not concrete!  You don't seem to understand that and are confusing everyone.

You must be blind because I am attacking you right now.  Maybe you should spend more time actually playing mafia.
Logged

Leafsnail

  • Bay Watcher
  • A single snail can make a world go extinct.
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 1 - *Replacement requested*
« Reply #414 on: May 27, 2010, 02:49:45 pm »

Now, you can't really read into a game you haven't played.
...What is that supposed to mean?
Yeah. That was bad.

You can't read into a player when you haven't played with them.
So what is he meant to do, considering he hasn't played with any of us before?

I began fresh with a RV on Leafsnail, then genuinely attacked Ottofar yesterday, and then voted Forsaken because he was acting more scummy than Ottofar.

Today I began fresh with Leafsnail and worked from there with still Leafsnail and now you.

A reaction of some sort?  Every question you ask is going to get a reaction of some sort, you aren't going to get what you want if you go accept anything!  That just makes it sound like you just want to pad your way through the day oh I don't know active lurking.  You accused me of being passive by making a list and you make the exact same thing in the post above me!

For my attacks that lack "proof" which is preposterous in the first place, I don't have concrete proof!  Unless you know something that I don't know I attack people the way they act or behave.  I don't make up something which makes no sense or make up concrete proof by lying.

You going to stop being a hypocrite scum and stop your passivity and active lurking so far?
I don't see any active lurking from Lone Wolf... he's just been attacking you.  I don't see how going straight for one person and attacking them could possibly be seen as active lurking.  Tunneling, maybe... but you obviously can't make such an accusation.

Your last post seems to flip the hell out over a small point.
Logged

Lonewolf I

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 2 *Replacement Found*
« Reply #415 on: May 27, 2010, 02:52:37 pm »

What.
You dont want to go after someone YOU THINK IS AN EXTERM.?

I do think he's an exterm, and I do think we should go after him. My concern with you is that you're doing nothing else, and you could be using the suspicions on Webadict as a safe harbor to pretend to scumhunt while protecting your buddies.  What is your opinion on the Me/Leafsnail vs Toonyman conflict?  Who do you think the three remaining dopps are?

@ Someone other than Org, Webadict, or Tooneyman: Am I underestimating the importance of finding the Exty early?  If I am, I will drop my pursuit of Org, and turn my attentions elsewhere.

You should look better because I have.  You see here I like to keep a balance between attacking and defending so I don't end up "everyone ignores you Webadict" aggressive or "scummy" defensive or whatever.

Yeah, if it's not concrete proof then it must be from judging what others say, I don't see why you had to fix yourself with that, it makes no sense!  I support my accusations the best I can, but it's not concrete!  You don't seem to understand that and are confusing everyone.

You must be blind because I am attacking you right now.  Maybe you should spend more time actually playing mafia.

You haven't attacked a single person who did not attack you first.  Any time you haven't been under attack, you've been activelurking.
Logged

ToonyMan

  • Bay Watcher
  • Danger Magnet
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 2 *Replacement Found*
« Reply #416 on: May 27, 2010, 02:56:03 pm »

@Lonewolf I,
When I explain something I explain it.  I really can't get any simpler than what I just said.  I support what I say by providing quotes and referring to things that actually happened.  You don't seem to understand that and I fear in the near future you're going to keep pulling that same phrase over and over again to make my attempts seem negligible and ineffective Lonewolf I.  Doing that isn't helpful to town, it just makes a whole page or two a repeating clusternut, which in turn makes the town (if they happen to be so) lazy.  I do not want this because it will most definitely hurt town's chances to find the remaining three scum and exterminator.  Who we want dead, and being all reassured because there is more of us is NOT okay!  Dead and earlier is what we are going to do OK?

Now Lonewolf, are you going to repeat the same accusation to waste time like the scum you are, going to keep your third bandwagon vote on me, relax your way to the end of the day, and not have me to worry about?  Because you do I have me to worry about, I am not going to let town go soft.  This is expected of all of us.

Pandarsenic, don't join games if your to busy taking a trillion exams.
Webadict is not posting as much as he usually does, lurking is not Webadict...
Org, be helpful scumguin.
Jokerman, stop being passive you weakling town or more appropriately SCUM.
Leafsnail, attacking me for voting who I thought was most scum, just stupid.

Right now my thoughts are this,

Dopps,
Leafsnail
Jokerman
Lonewolf I

Exterminator,
Webadict or Org


I began fresh with a RV on Leafsnail, then genuinely attacked Ottofar yesterday, and then voted Forsaken because he was acting more scummy than Ottofar.

Today I began fresh with Leafsnail and worked from there with still Leafsnail and now you.

A reaction of some sort?  Every question you ask is going to get a reaction of some sort, you aren't going to get what you want if you go accept anything!  That just makes it sound like you just want to pad your way through the day oh I don't know active lurking.  You accused me of being passive by making a list and you make the exact same thing in the post above me!

For my attacks that lack "proof" which is preposterous in the first place, I don't have concrete proof!  Unless you know something that I don't know I attack people the way they act or behave.  I don't make up something which makes no sense or make up concrete proof by lying.

You going to stop being a hypocrite scum and stop your passivity and active lurking so far?
I don't see any active lurking from Lone Wolf... he's just been attacking you.  I don't see how going straight for one person and attacking them could possibly be seen as active lurking.  Tunneling, maybe... but you obviously can't make such an accusation.
Lonewolf shouldn't incorrectly accuse me of active lurking.

Your last post seems to flip the hell out over a small point.
Finding small detail in everything is how you catch scum.


You should look better because I have.  You see here I like to keep a balance between attacking and defending so I don't end up "everyone ignores you Webadict" aggressive or "scummy" defensive or whatever.

Yeah, if it's not concrete proof then it must be from judging what others say, I don't see why you had to fix yourself with that, it makes no sense!  I support my accusations the best I can, but it's not concrete!  You don't seem to understand that and are confusing everyone.

You must be blind because I am attacking you right now.  Maybe you should spend more time actually playing mafia.

You haven't attacked a single person who did not attack you first.  Any time you haven't been under attack, you've been activelurking.
Stop making up crap and support yourself with evidence hypocrite.  I remember clearly attacking people first yesterday and today.  Your WOT or whatever on me is the opposite of what I see, you're interpreting wrong scum.
Logged

Solifuge

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 1 - *Replacement requested*
« Reply #417 on: May 27, 2010, 03:07:32 pm »

I don't see any active lurking from Lone Wolf... he's just been attacking you.  I don't see how going straight for one person and attacking them could possibly be seen as active lurking.  Tunneling, maybe... but you obviously can't make such an accusation.

(Toonyman,) your last post seems to flip the hell out over a small point.

I would have to second that, ToonyMan. You have flipped your proverbial shit, though the last post had a bit less fire and brimstone. Lone's got good, level-headed analysis, while you look like you're trying to prove how useful you are to everyone.

Also Org, you are REALLY obsessing over the Exterminator thing... into the realm of unhelpfulness. Remember that, for lynching, Scum are priority #1, and Exterminators priority #2. A 3rd-Party that is against both you and your enemy is still half an ally. We kill the Exterminator when their threat outweighs their usefulness... and more often they kill themselves on a War Veteran, Vengeful Guardian, or get Dopple-Snacked.

Moreover, y'all are trying to fit your observations into your preconcieved notions. That's bad science, doods. I'll be back to drop some friggin' nobel-prize-winning peer-reviewed Science on your collective arses this evening.
Logged

ToonyMan

  • Bay Watcher
  • Danger Magnet
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 2 *Replacement Found*
« Reply #418 on: May 27, 2010, 03:11:00 pm »

...How is everybody seeing this?

O.o

...
Looks like I'm going into my point of no return, bah.  Sorry.  Cool headed Toon here and out.
Logged

Lonewolf I

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal Mafa - Round 16 - Day 2 *Replacement Found*
« Reply #419 on: May 27, 2010, 03:14:51 pm »

Stop making up crap and support yourself with evidence hypocrite.  I remember clearly attacking people first yesterday and today.  Your WOT or whatever on me is the opposite of what I see, you're interpreting wrong scum.

Here's my evidence:
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Where's yours?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 49