Oh well, I guess this is a mistake.
I just want to explain, why I don't see religion or irrationality as necessary to stay "human".
First: An Idealist is one who believes, that the idea comes before matter - most religions are idealistic.
A Materialist is not one, who strives for material wealth (wealth is only "real" in an idealistic world) but onw, who believes, that any idea/mind/whatever is just an emergent process, based on less... fuzzy stuff.
Calling materialists cold is a fallacy, that only idealists can make: They mistake the materialist methodology (an idea) for "the" materialst goal. There is no materialistic goal. There are only goals, materialists might have.
When taking this serious, you are less likely to take your own wants for fundamental - I want to be free, you want to be safe, so let's look, how we can solve this. With idealist philosophy you will get the question: Okay, is freedom more important or safety? Why should I care? Importance is only an idea to help you through your life, why should I stick to it, when it's just in the way?
Trading a fast route for a less boring one isn't irrational. Wanting to see stuff and then trading the more interesting route for a shorter one because efficency is important is irrational. Somehow this always gets mixed up, because people think, the standard goals are programmed into the world.