God I wish I were scum here. Makes this a lot easier.
Egan, I may bias you here, but... I think I believe Jim. His reasoning is solid, and the evidence suggests that he was being used to prove Roden and Max innocent and be a fallguy when convenient.
Jim: Fair, fair. I see the problem. When you asked me about Roden, it felt like you were asking me to hunt Roden for you instead. Honestly, the question doesn't mean anything to me. What I felt about Roden is, well, it's gotta be one of Roden or Jim. It makes it hard to answer that question. Hopefully, that makes sense. It feels pretty loaded! I should've been nicer about that, though, you are right.
A lot of what Roden is saying is that his Actions are confirmed, but... Well, yeah (since Max killed every Night), though he never spoke out against Maximum Spin on the roleblock on Night 1. Jim had reason to believe it was fake, but I don't think Roden did. Roden pushes for the No Execute. Also... Max immediately votes Jim when I did. That is a very scary prospect. Max never votes there as Town, but... It's entirely possible he goes for a sudden lucky win as scum (he may see himself as caught anyway and spamming chat for a lucky Roden pop-in). Roden is also making comparative and subjective arguments, as opposed to showing Jim being maliceful and purposefully negligent. Jim is, at best, accidentally negligent, but his actions all make sense from a Town perspective. In fact, Max probably pushes him to track Roden to make the Track happen. Jim is also right that he should've used the votivate on Max.
Overall, this is a clear argumentative win by Jim.
Also, Jim did claim correctly that I was an Active carrier, and Roden tried to frame me on Day 3, where Jim absolutely pushes a Web/Egan team with Max as scum.
Anything flawed with my reasoning, Egan?