You're right, it is pointless to apply pressure to me, I talk when I want to talk. Speaking of talking, it's time to talk.
doll: Your case on me is lazy and speaks to your inattention to the thread. Cinder claimed the roleblock in the thread:
Okay, Cinder, then who did you inspect last Night?
TBF. This has the effect of roleblocking him.
Yes, I'm vague about my role, that's a safety feature. I'm still wary of roles that utilize the rolenames or ability names of others to perform effects like Cheeetar in the five SK BYOR. Additionally, I like to be very thorough in what I say: I said "going back on my earlier claim" because if I didn't some clown would decide to say "lol 4mask lier implied only one ability", which yes, I did imply one ability, specifically because I was trying to keep the other a secret for what should be obvious reasons.
Now, on to your next accusation: no, I did not try to redirect the kill. My exact words were:
For want of other targets, I'd suggest 4maskwolf.
Don't do this, I have a kill-specific revive so it'd be a waste of everyone's time. If you think I'm scum you're better off lynching me.
juicebox: Welcome.
I then, when questioned by webadict, explained why it would be a waste of time, an explanation that, yes,
did include the words "the vigilante could target someone else". And of course I don't want the kill targeted at me, who does? This isn't Paranormal 25, we haven't broken the setup, there's no reason for me to lie down and take a kill to the face since it wouldn't actually benefit the town. But there's nothing I can do to stop juicebox other than ask him not to and explain why it would be a bad idea: he still got to make up his own mind.
Meanwhile, let's take a look at you, your cases, and your actions. You attempt to direct a vigilante kill with only a few hours left in the day, leaving limited time left to discuss if it's the proper course of action. You pursue a lazy case on a non-cleared player without actually bringing forth significant evidence and that displays severe gaps in your knowledge of the game and interest in confirming information. If we're talking about people who have taken strange enough actions to vote for, I might as well throw this one out here:
doll.
Yes, I do have an action I'd like to share with the class, or rather, the lack of an action: I was roleblocked last night. So we have a second roleblocker in the game.
juicebox: Fix your quotes in the future. Seriously, I lost track of the conversation between you and doll and everyone because your quotes are so fucked. Okay, now moving on from my irritation: my reads list:
BHK: generally strong town game, I know he didn't perform the mafiakill n1 which, with an ability as unreliable as his, is a pretty good indication that he's probably not scum.
doll: See above, plus a whole bunch of other thoughts I have to look back over but that don't paint him in a good light from my perspective.
Tiruin: By herself, a tad townie, but here's the thing: my issues with doll cast a negative light over her too. I'll get to this later once I've had a chance to collect my thoughts more, I'm trying to bash out this post as quickly as possible.
juicebox: Ah, the great unknown. Need more
cowbell information.
TDS: I'll be honest: even without the meta-clearing and even with his strange behavior, I'd still put him as top town. His erratic actions, while highly anti-town, were also so bold and blatant that, honestly, I don't think he would do that as scum. Because for a while there the only thing that kept him alive was the fact that his power seemed so townie to everyone they wouldn't kill/lynch him, his use of his abilities pissed off a lot of people. From my experience, TDS is an intelligent enough player not to do something so stupid as scum but too risk-averse and not canny enough to try and subvert expectations like that as scum. Town.
Author
Topic: Fallacy's BYOR 2: Game over! Post-game write up up. (Read 99883 times)