Why the fishing so early? I call your claiming fishing because I almost told you about my role in response to some of those claims.
[...]
This is also why I called NQT's claims fishing, too. It got you to admit you have an investigative night power - or at least a night power of some sort, it may be a kill instead given claim 2.
Please clarify. Do you call them fishing because of the result you see (my admission, your near-admission), because you think he should have foreseen this result, or because you think he was deliberately trying to get the result? If one of the latter two, please explain why you think so.
As for your RVS questions, you handed out the three "same question(s)" questions to get multiple perspectives on the questions asked. Also, to fill a list because you like full RVS question sets, even when RVS has been largely evaded.
since I probably have to pick someone who isn't NQT, I'd choose... *groan* Jack A T. His response to NQT's response to his claim is baffling; who wouldn't come to that conclusion after reading JackClaim2; especially the person being threatened? Yes, I headed there too, thinking he was claiming a kill, when I read that claim. And claiming to mimic NQT was suspicious too.
Interesting. You see a kill too. Always fascinating to watch what people guess my action is.
Now, I understand you want a response to this. There really isn't much to respond to, though. You skipped a key step: connecting your observations to your conclusion. What makes scum more likely to take both actions noted than town? What makes them suspicious?
Anyway, you seem awfully reluctant to suspect me, what with the groan and all. Why?