Unlike your brief glimpse of 10 kbp/s, it is seen so common here that I assumed it was natural...until I heard of pretty much everyone else with their 10Mbp/s stuff. 100. 1GB...
"You merely adopted the shitty Internet. I was born in it."And Shakerag isn't voting. I don't have much experience with the lynch all lurkers idea, but is it really better to lynch someone who hasn't been acting at all than to lynch someone who's been acting scummy?
Policy lynches are more for scaring the people they would affect than to actually use as a reasonable plan. I doubt that would deter Shakerag though.
It really depends on the two players.
Jim voting Scripten for a friendly tone with Mastahcheese.
Yes, that's right. It's important to note he's not done that to anybody else who has voted him.
(But I'm also unvoting him later on in the post.)
In this post you also asked someone about votes but listed them out of order. Any particular reason behind that?
Not really. Just the order I found them in.
MC was voting pisskop at Day end yesterday. Since you feel pretty strongly that pisskop is scummy, do you feel that MC would be willing to buss pisskop at day end. Do you think 4maskwolf would pull his gambit in the knowledge that one of his scumbuddies was in the group in order
to give them town credit?
Yes. If I were in mastahcheese's position and pisskop were on my team, I would've tried to bus him too. Rallying to the vig's side and killing the scumbucket who was trying to supply him targets would've looked good, if he could have gone about it in a way that didn't look like a really transparent bandwagon.
Also yes. That would be perfectly in the realm of possibility, but I'm not going to try to make sense of 4maskwolf's gambit because all evidence points to there being very little of that in them.
This is a kind of specific situation you're talking about, so I really don't have a lot of examples.
- examples
Hrm.
HRM.
Hrmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
HRRRRRRRRRMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM.
Bah.
Unvote. Congratulations, you have successfully appealed to your meta.
Right. Except he doesn't. He's giving us rat turds. Those interpretations are your's, not his. He hasn't given us anything. A bunch of implications that fit into one line.
Look again. Nowhere does he take a stance on any player. Nowhere.
Persus13's interpretation is accurate.
Saying that I only have null reads is disingenuous when it's abundantly clear that on my list of reads there are people I suspect and people I think are town.
Why are you being disingenuous in pursuing your case on me?
Like otherwise stated, masta was looking to distance (I mislabeled it bussing) himself a bit from Jim, using especially nasty language.
Then you're doing a phenomenal job distancing yourself from me. You're practically running a marathon away from me at this point, with your snide nicknames and you're calling my reads rat turds.
My reads are very offended that you called them rat turds, by the way. I demand you apologize.
Actually, the medium could ask him 
We already know why flabort didn't choose to kill Shakerag.
Cheeetar has entered butthurt levels of tunneling. 
Help me lynch ScumJim, and all will be again right in your world.
Why don't you vote me before you start trying to wheel and deal your way to getting me lynched.
But if we set him to look at someone then we can confirm each night that he's not performing the nightkill. Even if scum, he'd be neutered scum. I'd like to kill unneutered scum. I need to look back over the game.
Why is eliminating scum who are performing the night kill more important than eliminating scum in general? That seems to arbitrarily make scumhunting more difficult for little benefit, since the dopps are going to continue to use the night kill no matter who's alive.
I'm just going to vote
pisskop and call it a day.
Dude's scummy. By this point y'all should know why I think this.
Author
Topic: Paranormal 24 - Game over! Doppelganger Victory! (Read 219058 times)