Currently 4 votes on Shakerag and 3 on Scripten if I counted correctly.
Pisskop:No extension. No need.
Neither wagon is large by any stanards. We have only half the playerbase voting for the leading wagons.
If you think 3 votes out of the 7 usually required is large . . .
Day ends in 5 hours, Neither wagon being large is precisely why I want an extension. If someone is lynched, I would prefer 5-7 votes on them. Do you want to lynch someone who has promised content? How about someone who's wagon appeared out of nowhere.
The only reason you don't consider these D2 reads is because he doesn't say if he has a town or scum lean on all the players. It's fairly obvious to me from this post that Jim considers Cheeetar and NQT to be town, and possibly me as well, with everyone else either null, lurking or you. That's 2, maybe 3 players he considers to be town but you believe him to be saying meh on but isn't. One thing you may be ignoring is that this is a list from scummiest to least scummiest. It's far from comparable to Tiruin. Why are the only people you seem to find really suspicious are people who have voted you or Tiruin?
Right. Except he doesn't. He's giving us rat turds. Those interpretations are your's, not his. He hasn't given us anything. A bunch of implications that fit into one line.
Look again. Nowhere does he take a stance on any player. Nowhere.
The list is from scummiest (you) to least scummiest (Jim). Anyone below the multiple meh comments are people Jim seems to lean town on. He doesn't specifically say that he leans town on them, but that wasn't part of the question. I agree that Jim having only 1 scum suspect is odd, and he should get more, but given the fact that most of D1 and D2 revolved around you, I'm not surprised that he doesn't have much on anyone else.
In addition, my suspects included a list larger than those who have ever voted me. I'm currently voting Shaker, and was suspicious of UX before he started doing whatever he's doing; he is certainly not posting here. I find UZ lynchable, and I voted you.
You are trying to mis-present the nature of the case I have on him.
UZ? do you mean ZU? And what do you mean by you find him lynchable? Yes, you voted me, and then promptly unvoted, showing you either respond easily to pressure, or weren't really serious about it. But I'll admit I was worng and you have voted beyond the pool of people suspicious of you.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Can you explain please.
Like otherwise stated, masta was looking to distance (I mislabeled it bussing) himself a bit from Jim, using especially nasty language.
This whole time, I've been trying to wrap my head around things, to see who is scummiest. But now there's so many people irritating me, that I'm actually feeling inclined to agree with Jim, of all people.
And here is more of it. You are welcome to describe a history between them, but Jim's minimal response indicates himself distancing as well as well as how over-emphasized the nastiness was. Unwarrented nastiness when all others but his votees were glazed over is a fairly strong indication of scum-scum interaction.
I can definitely see it as distancing, or I can see it as Mastahcheese bandwagoning again, and Jim calling him out on it. It depends on whether or not you view Jim as scum or not. Votees? I'm still not sure what you're trying to say. As is, Jim's response to Mastah's post is normal for Jim's personality.
I oppose it because I doubt it would come otherwise, and I am unwilling to use our final extension for one post.
Also, we can actively vote against extensions? Neat-o
OPPOSE EXTENSION
We get two extensions EACH day. Not for the whole game.
ZULPfp Persus why was Shakerag obligated to follow Nqts advice?
I'll bearound at day end again if anything happens. I also don't thhink an extend is really needed.
He wasn't, but NQT's point about how we can verify Flabort's vig claim was a good one, in my humble opinion, and Flabort turned out to be a vig, so I am a bit suspicious of people who voted him at day end.
Shakerag:UXLZ:
So did you not feel that there was enough to talk about between D1 and the events so far in D2 that you had to come up with a random topic?
Oh, wait, I think you're mistaken. I didn't roll for the topic, just the person I'd ask Jim his opinion on.
That would seem to imply to me that you didn't really care who you got an opinion on from Jim, but that you needed to ask him a question to fill space. Why not focus on some concrete aspect of what has happened in the game instead of asking for an opinion on a random player?
Why are you complaining about UXLZ asking questions?
We lynched an anti-town player on D1. We managed to avoid lynching Flabort or Pisskop. So participate and stop trying to make us feel sorry for you. Flabort didn't kill you, and now he can't.
It was dumb luck that we lynched third party on D1. We don't have confirmation that pissk is town yet either. And I couldn't give fewer shits whether anyone feels sorry for me or not.
Dumb luck? TDS was behaving scummy all day. It would be dumb luck only if everyone rolled a die to determine who they would lynch. Day 1's lynch wasn't from fallout over a gambit via PM, but from TDS being scummy. By your logic, every time we lynch scum, its dumb luck.
Are you also planning on voting me, Shakerag? 
Not presently, but do you want me to change my plans?
This a threat?
Deus Asmoth:I'm in favour of an extend. I want to see Tiruin's post before deciding whether to vote for her or not, and Scripten looks town in my book, so I'd rather he didn't get lynched.
PPE: Since a three way tie isn't in our best interest and Shakerag is the least productive member of the game, vote Shakerag.
Shakerag is less productive then Tiruin?
Author
Topic: Paranormal 24 - Game over! Doppelganger Victory! (Read 218914 times)