Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Persus13]

pisskop is giving off a bit of a newbie town vibe

The guy is reveling in playing Mafia. Did you see the silly 'testimonials' he's shown? You can't excuse his poor play by him being new to Mafia. How do you really read him, Persus?

Well, then I consider myself corrected, I'm getting a really weird vibe from pisskop.

[Persus13]

ZU: This is piggybacking off of NQT a bit, but I'm going to echo the 'having no suspects other than ZU' part of Persus' post as highly suspect.

Except I didn't say I had no other suspects besides ZU. I said I had a few, with Shakerag being the obvious one.

[Jim Groovester]

Speaking of which. Flabort and Pisskop can go die. My other lynch choices would be Mastahcheese and Shakerag. Maybe Scripten.

This is Toonyman's list of suspects. Mastahcheese is one of those suspects, as is pisskop, Shakerag, and Scripten. Hmmm. I'm wondering if Toony was right about anyone besides cheese.

I'm curious to know why you brought this up.

He was right about mastahcheese but he was also wrong about flabort, and he didn't have a special role that would give his list of suspects any more weight than normal.

[Deus Asmoth]

NQT can you define a confirmable target? Is it someone whose role is known that would be able to yea or nay what pisskop claims they did?

[pisskop]

Are you asking me to follow you?

[Persus13]

Speaking of which. Flabort and Pisskop can go die. My other lynch choices would be Mastahcheese and Shakerag. Maybe Scripten.

This is Toonyman's list of suspects. Mastahcheese is one of those suspects, as is pisskop, Shakerag, and Scripten. Hmmm. I'm wondering if Toony was right about anyone besides cheese.

I'm curious to know why you brought this up.

He was right about mastahcheese but he was also wrong about flabort, and he didn't have a special role that would give his list of suspects any more weight than normal.

I was trying to figure out why Toony was killed, then I noticed that post. While his primary suspect was flabort, he was right about cheese, so that may be why the scum killed him.

I am completely failing to find things that stand out to me as scummy enough to vote someone over. However, some of Scripten's interactions with Mastahcheese are looking pretty scummy, so I'd like to look further into that right now.

[Deus Asmoth]

Are you asking me to follow you?

Not necessarily me, but if you follow someone that you could reasonably guess the action of (like if Shakerag stays home or I visit X person who I think needs guarding) and then that person confirms it, is that a confirmable target?

[Mephansteras]

The Whiteboard
pisskop: Cheeetar, Jim Groovester
Persus13: notquitethere
Scripten: Tiruin, Toaster
Shakerag: Deus Asmoth
Tiruin: Scripten, UXLZ
UXLZ: zombie urist, Shakerag



Day ends ~5pm Pacific Today

[Persus13]

We have a four way tie as it stands currently between pisskop, Scripten, UXLZ, and Tiruin. We gave Tiruin a chance to post, and she has failed to deliver, and I'd rather she be lynched over UXLZ, who currently I see as the most town of the people in the tie and Scripten and pisskop.

[notquitethere]

Cheetar

Actually, here's a problem: What if Pisskop covers for one of his scumbuddies night 2 by saying he followed them and they went nowhere while in actuality they performed the scumkill.

Yep, and when that person that performed the kill flipped scum we'd have the solidest grounds to lynch Pisskop.

Would it be 'confirmable' if Pisskop said somebody did nothing, NQT?

Only if we were reasonably sure that the person really did do nothing/wasn't in league with the Pisskop.


Deus

NQT can you define a confirmable target? Is it someone whose role is known that would be able to yea or nay what pisskop claims they did?

A confirmable target is one that: A: can say whether or not they did something; B: we can be reasonably sure Pisskop doesn't know what they'll do ahead of time. We don't have to know they're role, only be reasonably sure that Deus doesn't know what they're going to do/is in cahoots with them.


7 hours left to the day, now to figure out who I'm definitely voting...

[zombie urist]

Pfp keep in mind cheetar has two votes

[Deus Asmoth]

We have a four way tie as it stands currently between pisskop, Scripten, UXLZ, and Tiruin. We gave Tiruin a chance to post, and she has failed to deliver, and I'd rather she be lynched over UXLZ, who currently I see as the most town of the people in the tie and Scripten and pisskop.

This is incorrect. After your vote, there is a tie between Tiruin and Pisskop at three each. I'd really prefer it if we could lynch Zombie, but out of the four with votes actually on them, pisskop is town (or very good at RiA'ing), I think it's kind of ridiculous that Scripten is actually kind of close to getting lynched with the votes that are on him (one that's a placeholder for details that was dropped ten pages ago, but still no justification, one over not being 100% on who the scumteam are on day 1?) and UXLZ is reading neutral to town for me at the moment. So by process of elimination, Tiruin. It kind of sucks to lynch someone over things that are outside their control, but at least this way we'll get something out of her other than 'information to follow later'.

[Persus13]

Pfp keep in mind cheetar has two votes

Thanks for correcting me, I completely forgot about that.

We have a four way tie as it stands currently between pisskop, Scripten, UXLZ, and Tiruin. We gave Tiruin a chance to post, and she has failed to deliver, and I'd rather she be lynched over UXLZ, who currently I see as the most town of the people in the tie and Scripten and pisskop.

This is incorrect. After your vote, there is a tie between Tiruin and Pisskop at three each. I'd really prefer it if we could lynch Zombie, but out of the four with votes actually on them, pisskop is town (or very good at RiA'ing), I think it's kind of ridiculous that Scripten is actually kind of close to getting lynched with the votes that are on him (one that's a placeholder for details that was dropped ten pages ago, but still no justification, one over not being 100% on who the scumteam are on day 1?) and UXLZ is reading neutral to town for me at the moment. So by process of elimination, Tiruin. It kind of sucks to lynch someone over things that are outside their control, but at least this way we'll get something out of her other than 'information to follow later'.

ZU already pointed that out, but thanks.

[Cheeetar]

Cheetar

Actually, here's a problem: What if Pisskop covers for one of his scumbuddies night 2 by saying he followed them and they went nowhere while in actuality they performed the scumkill.

Yep, and when that person that performed the kill flipped scum we'd have the solidest grounds to lynch Pisskop.

Would it be 'confirmable' if Pisskop said somebody did nothing, NQT?

Only if we were reasonably sure that the person really did do nothing/wasn't in league with the Pisskop.

And we'd know these things after the fact because...? What if he followed a scum who actually did do nothing, and that person flipped scum? We literally have no way of knowing later on if Pisskop has been lying to us, NQT. 'Confirmable' is nothing. Keeping Pisskop alive is useless.

[pisskop]

Except you can't muster the support to lynch me, even with your double votes.  So Chilllax, Take a nap, and tunnel me again tomorrow.



  Did Tiruin promise any content-heavy post?  I looked, and the last time I saw her mention good posting was 2-3 days ago.

FOS: Tiruin
  C'mon gal.