Deathsword:
Vivalas for all the reasons provided D1 and the fact they absolutely vanished after people started targeting them.
It would probably be handy if you provided a link or post number to your reasoning. I remember that you did state it but I'm not fond of rooting around for it.
Very well. Spoilered because size.
Vivalas: First things first, please quote the post or point out the post number that you are responding to.
Ok, so let's recap what you did recently:
Let's be honest...
[spoiler]
I've read the guides, read through some games, and I'm the type that likes to read wikis completely before actually playing the game. I learn pretty quickly, but if ya wanna yell at me for beaking the "circle of mafia" then, I would understand. Other than that, I understand the game, although I didn't expect it to be this ruthless... Gah. Its a game of psychology pretty much, so I should be good at it 
You claim that, despite being new to mafia, you've completely read wikis and such about it, thus making you quite informed about the game and how it works.
I'm gonna admit that I would hide if I were lookout so, sorry. No
I can't vote either for that matter since I am still trying to figure out who to trust.
Scum aren't gonna want people to see their first action of the game of course.
First you say you won't vote since you are trying to figure out who to trust... how exactly? By doing nothing?
Do you mean the one at the beginning of the game? I think it was rather eck for Scripten to attack Perseus for attacking Mastacheese.
What is even "eck". And why is it... "eck" for Scripten to do that?
But, despite whatever the fuck "eck" is (although I am assuming it is negative, somehow), you then do this:
Comrade Shamrock
Comrade Shamrock: If you were lookout would you hide?
Why do you do an RVS post clearly past RVS phase? Especially when you have a perfectly good lead with Scripten attacking Persus?
You even admit that it's RVS!
My vote for Shamrock is purely RVS.
By asking him what he would do as lookout, I am attempting to discern his allignment by analysing his response, even though the lookout mechanic is rather vague, I feel my question is an appropriate question, which should be easy to answer.
TolyK: Your heated counterattack seems borderline OMGUS.
Why?
Your motives are questionable.
Why?
Such a heated defense would seem scummy, for a simple D1 read.
Why?
[/quote]
Vivalas: You conveniently didn't answer most of my questions. For your convenience, here they are:
I'm gonna admit that I would hide if I were lookout so, sorry. No
I can't vote either for that matter since I am still trying to figure out who to trust.
Scum aren't gonna want people to see their first action of the game of course.
First you say you won't vote since you are trying to figure out who to trust... how exactly? By doing nothing?
Do you mean the one at the beginning of the game? I think it was rather eck for Scripten to attack Perseus for attacking Mastacheese.
What is even "eck". And why is it... "eck" for Scripten to do that?
Comrade Shamrock
Comrade Shamrock: If you were lookout would you hide?
Why do you do an RVS post clearly past RVS phase? Especially when you have a perfectly good lead with Scripten attacking Persus?
And then there is... this:
@everyone If you really must know, eck in that case implied I was slightly put off by the Scripten-Perseus exchange. Not really enough to warrant a vote or further investigation, since they later cleared it up.
TolyK:
Why are you so offended about the possibility of being considered town?
Followed by a vote. Scum can buddy up to others, as Persus mentioned. If I call you town, then am I completely and utterly cleared in your eyes? Because if not, you are going against your own logic.
[/spoiler]
[/quote]
1. I meant figuring out who to trust, by going back and closely looking at relationships, etc., doing more work.
2.I answered waht "eck' means
3.Because I missed the TolyK post earlier on. I felt like doing RVS being my first post of the game, why are you so inclined against pitting me against Scripten and Perseus?
4.No, but how am I contradicting my own logic? That seems like an EXTREMELY overused statement used in arguments. People seem to throw it out like candy when they have nothing better to say. What I meant when I asked that question, was the somewhat exaggerated response to being considered town by another player. TolyK has already stated he wanted to get his point across, though I am still a bit skeptic of him,
not because of his intentions or the reasoning behind being offended, but because of the heat of his response I admit perhaps I made it not seem so obvious of that.
However, given your even more heated attack on me, I now am more wary of you, as your attack on me raises questions.
Deathsword: Why is your response even more aggressive to my attack on TolyK, then TolyK was himself? Perhaps my attack on him raised scrutiny, but now that Caz has been alleged scum, I seem to wonder if Caz's scrutiny of TolyK's aggressive response was not in the best interest of the town, and am losing scrutiny of TolyK.
Why did you conveniently not answer my questions? Did you not answer my questions, to get me to answer yours? Do you think that not holding up expectations you hold to others is the correct way to solve problems? I think perhaps the more mature response would of been to answer my questions, then ask why I didn't answer yours, unless of course you might think answering my questions would not be in your best interest.
Do you think that TolyK is scum? (Yes/No answer please)
Author
Topic: Operation Overlord, Day Five: Game Over! Town, Town-Ally, and Survivor Victory! (Read 112558 times)