tn5421: Alright. This is what I'm getting from your assorted posts:
*Prior Mafia games (I'm assuming outside of those noted on your MafiaScum Wiki page) were in areas that tended not to have much aggression and boldness, but gave advice to be aggressive and bold.
*Attempts to be aggressive tended to get you killed.
*When seeing advice to be aggressive/bold in Bay 12 (a place that does like aggression and boldness), you were suspicious due to prior mafia... trauma, I guess works as a word here. This suspicion is crap.
*After enough pressure, you decided to try aggression.
*... by creating a terrible case.
*You're also angry, due in part to MafiaScum having server issues.
*You're even angrier, due to perceiving the backlash against your case as the anti-aggression murderiness you remember from early games.
*Running on anger, you've started repeatedly firing everything you have at your feet.
I see too much reminding me of my own failures in Supernatural 3 here (my first game on Bay 12, while I was used to the EpicMafia meta. Which had trained me to do some pretty shitty things, it being EpicMafia.), and I've been having doubts about my vote for a while (largely due to the feeling that this was what was going on).
Unvote. I need to reevaluate the game.
Advice: As I said, take some time to relax. Have that tea/coffee/whatever. Read
something remotely funny.On your attack on borno:
The statement-statement-question style used by borno is a reasonably common RVS question writing style. See, for example, this:
Imp - You are scum. Right off the bat, you are confronted with the devil himself in Townie Form during RVS and he tunnels aggressively. How do you get him off your back?
When searching for more examples (quick google search), I found this little post from borno:
Griffionday:
It is N1, and you are the scum roleblocker. There are two players you are debating over roleblocking, a lurking player or an active player. Who do you chose to roleblock?
RangerCado:
It is N1, and you are a vanilla mafioso. There are two players you are debating over killing, a lurking player who has a few cases against you or an active player who has not gotten a read off of you yet. Who do you choose to kill?
Imperial Guardsman:
It is N1, and you are the cop. There are two players you are debating over investigating, a lurking player and an active yet scummy player. Who do you choose to inspect?
swordsmith04:
It is N1, and you are the doctor. There are two players you are debating over investigating, a lurking player but is solid when he posts, or a more active player from whom you have a more null-tell on. Who do you chose to inspect?
Spectr:
It is D1, and you are a vanilla townie. There are two players you are debating over putting the tie-breaking vote on, a lurking player and an active yet scummy player. Who do you choose to lynch?
Okami No Rei:
It is D1, and you are the scum roleblocker. There are two play styles you are debating over using, a slightly more lurky playstyle to avoid attention, or a more active play style in which you are more likely to slip up. Which one do you choose?
Nerjin:
It is LyLo, and you are a vanilla townie. There are two players who are both suspicious of you, as you were lurking most of the game. What do you say to divert their suspicion?
Deathsword:
It is LyLo and you are a vanilla mafioso. There are two players who are both suspicion of you, as you were lurking most of the game. What do you say to divert their suspicion?
Aaaaaaand I think that's everyone.
Yes, that is borno's standard RVS question writing style. Borno, I will note, was town that game.