I don't believe you. There would either be a reason you're different, you know you're different and refuse to explain how, or you're simply lying and are just like everybody else.
Anyhow, I'm not really a fan of lies.
I never lied. Trufax. I cannot tell you why I'm different. I have a hunch, but no more.
Darvi.
Challenge accepted.
So. You're voting me.
On the grounds that I'm different.
Now tell me, remember when somebody's role was fundamentally different from the others in the first B12 Mafia? I suspect something similar is going on just to make my life harder.
LS said that some of the killers are probably scum. Rolling with that assertion, they'll be able to use their kills to kill town, by getting the town to kill three other town with only D1 information. It's extremely unlikely that we'd hit all three scum with D1 daygaming and info even without scum messing-around-in-things.
Just
listen at yourself. The goal is not to instantly kill all scum on N1. The goal was to kill whoever everybody considers to be the most scummy.
Exactly like regular dayplay.
Why would I not notice if I weren't town? Anyway, it's not more information. Being a interrogator and shooting a guy in the head before he answers any questions is not more information. Neither is shooting three people N1.
What if the interrogee never answers the questions because he's lurking. What if he dodges the questions. What if he is completely motherfucking scummy on D1?
It is more information because then we have gotten rid of those people who would only distract from scumhunting anyway. That, indirectly, leads to more information because then we don't have to bother with them anymore.
You haven't done it yourself, nor has Leafsnail, mister wise guy.
Yes. Yes we did. We were planning. To use the kills. On those people that the town considers worthy to be killed. Instead of letting scum decide who to use their kill(s) on.
That he thinks people are scummy/useless if they disagree with him. He pretty much just outright said it.
That is an outright lie because he said you were useless and scummy for initially refusing to reveal any information. Not for disagreeing with you.
Go ahead and show me a single example of something I didn't read. I'll then counter your accusation with how I had answered it and how I then used it later on, as well as how many other times I answered the exact same question with answers not read.
I'm not talking about the not reading. I'm talking about the "ignoring [him] and using that to try and make arguments".
Because your single argument against the masskill is that "Hey that might not kill scum!"
Well guess what genius. So does lynching. Except that way we get four days worth of lynching without the mafia getting a kill in between.
And if one of the one-shot killers is scum, then at least we can direct them at somebody who town
wants to see dead as opposed to somebody who certainly is town.
And before you start with "not enough information", have you even
read how many people are good lynches by this point? Toaster already suggested a few. If you consider that to be stupid, then you better bring up some good arguments for not lynching any of you guys.