There's always one newbie who thinks he's hot shit straight out of the gate. This game, it's you.
Every single one's come around eventually. How long will it take for you? I hope for the sake of your ego it doesn't take too long. It would be terrible if whenever you looked back to your first game you remembered what a bullheaded dickbag you were for the whole thing, and how 100% justified Dariush and I were to bash mafia lessons into your head with no concern for your opinion at the time.
Is there a place where we can vote on the best ICs on this forum? Because I know exactly who I wouldn't vote for. Honestly, do you even believe the crap that you're trying to spoon-feed me?
No, there isn't. If you have complaints, bring them up at the end of the game. Despite our manner in game we are very receptive to feedback about the whole Beginner's Mafia process, since we want to ensure it's as easy a transition as possible to go from your first game to games on the rest of the forum.
Okay, I can see the logic there. It's very important for me to convince people that Andrew is acting scummy because -- oh, wait. Most of the players have already acknowledged that Andrew is acting scummy. Do you really expect me to spend an hour compiling quotes and responses just to satisfy you? You wouldn't vote for him even if I did because that would be too easy.
How about this, jackass: It doesn't mean shit if a bunch of new players thinks your case is good, because what the hell do they know?
If you want to really know how good you are, how about you make a case so good that I become
dead quiet, because you know I only speak up when there's something wrong.
The case.
Eh, Andrew425 is just bad. It's not a crime to be terrible at a game, and that's the whole point he's here.
This is also bullshit. As I said before, a forced claim of indifference. I don't buy it for a second. Even if he were town, I strongly doubt he'd be so 'meh' about being lynched.
Eh, attitudes like this are pretty typical. He's also played in Beginner's Mafias before, so he's got a thicker skin about this sort of thing, and he's learned the lesson about how lynches are supposed to be helpful in the scumhunt.
Generally, if somebody is going to be lynched, then they should present their cases as best as possible, so that they can be looked at after he flips.
I might be mistaken, but isn't prodding lurkers a minor scumtell? I seem to recall that coming up in the last BM.
Ehhhh, not really. If that's all they were doing and they weren't following up at all, it would be scummy, but that's not exclusive to prodding lurkers.
Also, what's your opinion
of Nilum doing the same thing?
Jim: The roles people are playing may influence their decisions. By asking them what roles they would like to play, it may be what they are playing in the first place.
And how are you supposed to know when somebody's favorite role is their actual role?
As I mentioned before, my favorite role is Your Mother. If Your Mother was a valid role in this setup, you can't assume that just because it's my favorite role that it's the role I have.
It's not a question that will lead you anywhere useful, so why did you ask it?
By active lurker I mean he's not a lurker, but he is posting things without any substance. He is only answering questions driven to him by Mormota. If you'll have noticed, my vote was on him since the very beginning.
If he's got no substance to his posts, show it.
Andrew: Why is it you're only answering questions from Mormota? Why is it, that you're not actually asking questions to people in return? You're not scumhunting at all; you're just answering questions.
This really looks like a question to make you look active, instead of a question to find out if Andrew425 is scum.
I'mma have to unvote
Fanofgaming,
ansontan2000.
Ansontan You haven't contributed anything to the discussion, content to sit at the back and try to snipe. You're being a lurker.
If you've got an accusation, you better have evidence.
You've voted but you haven't done a lot in the attacking department. Show me a case.