Sorry about that. I couldn't handle the text walls yesterday.
Let's start with
Kilakan.
This reasoning on Max is crap. He's using straw man arguments throughout, without delivering a good attack anywhere. I specifically want more detail on this part:
Basically I was saying that toaster changes what he said to match what he though Max would like to hear. Though he still says that Max is buddying but when Max hears that it wasn't his questions that were the problem, he just ignores the buddying part.
Here he backs off his Max case- probably because he realizes it sucks. He's still working to make Max look bad, however.
Appeal to Authority on an attempt to get more people voting Solifuge.
Here is piggybacking off Vector's reasoning.
Jim: Why is Solifuge's lurking more lynchworthy than Pandar?
Reference here.
Noted on Kilakan.
Max: Questions for you:
That's a really bizarre thing to just accept at an answer like that. I said it was a miscommunication, and I meant that. When you said that, I must have thought you meant something else, or I wasn't thinking straight (as mentioned earlier). Then you just accept that interpretation at face value.
From there on you felt privileged to just declare me an activelurker from the rooftops.
I think it's really silly that I'm still defending something I said offhandedly three days ago.
Well yes, it was a little strange that you said yes to conspiring to lurk and bandwagon. I mean I wanted to judge how defensive you were, but instead agreeing with me? And you know, I notice you still haven't explained what you thought you were agreeing too. I give you every chance to explain yourself, and you just put your fingers in your ears and yell that I am wrong even louder.
But what ever, enough people seem to think you mean something else for me to go along with it for now. They can't all be scum trying to protect you, can they? Hopefully not. Still if it comes to lynching you or anybody else right now, you are it.
Can you expand on that last sentence? Your next vote was on Kilakan, not Josh; yet you're threatening Josh here.
Josh I still think is scum. Maybe one day I can prove it...
What are you doing to do so?
Vector: As a couple of others pointed out,
this post was based on almost complete misconception, but you hang your vote on him. Did you realize at the time you were tying the votes? What was the point of your "you can no longer accuse me of bandwagoning right now" comment?
On Crown tying the vote:
By my count, he actually untied it:
Dariush: JoshuaFH
JoshuaFH: Dariush, Jokerman-EXE
kilakan: lordnincompoop, Solifuge, Toaster, CrownofFire
Max White: Pandarsenic, Vector
Pandarsenic: Leafsnail
Solifuge: Jim Groovester, kilakan, Max White
In any case,
Crown, you'll need to do better than a cardboard case on Kilakan. Ideally, you give some other scum suspects.
Lastly, back to
Jim: Updated read on Max is still leaning neutral to town, mostly for lack of anything scummy and that he seems to come by his arguments honestly, other than the point regarding Josh.
If you're going to yell about lurkers, don't forget
Jokerman. RVS is long over, bubba!