I just want to chip in and say that I agree with the sentiment that yes, not having desire to perform the crude reproductive actions of "sex" with someone (
I'd rather just splice my genes into a clone using a hair or something...) does not mean I don't desire money or fellowship or a bigger better computer, or games or spicy spicy food or an all you can eat buffet or fast food or an education or the ability to fly independently of other people (such as a jetpack or
hoverboard).
I certainly desire things, but just not "curves" or the insertion of flesh into other flesh, or the fluids that come out of either flesh. Or imagery that brings to mind anything related to those acts or portions of anatomy (like most advertisements that objectify girls/women/females to get men to buy their products).
And I will avoid that. I just had a large debate with someone (who was drunk) last night on the internet over whether possibility exists, and why we should have laws against driving drunk.
I would argue FOR having laws against drunk driving. It's got a different name from driving for a reason. Most people would, I imagine (except people who drink and people who think that people who drink are harmless or faking it, plus maybe a few other exceptions).
However, this is where it gets strange, I would argue against possibility. And free will. Due to how I understand particle physics. Other people are allowed to think I am wrong, since I believe (notice I didn't say "choose to believe") that belief in free will is necessary for most people. I'm not going to say it's necessary to maintain their sanity, I'm perfectly sane despite a stressful job and a learning disability (though I like to say that the disability makes me "certified mildly insane", it's legally not true and I'm sane), and I don't believe in free will, but I believe that the people who do believe in it believe in it because the particles that they are made of are going to move in the patterns and have moved in the patterns that will make them believe in free will.
Simply put, I believe Newton's First Law applies even to particles of the tiniest immeasurable sizes,
even when they cause particles that we can measure "spontaneously" appear in a seeming vacuum, and that they will always move in the way that they are going to move, and when they collide or exert forces on each other and act as outside forces,
that's because they were always going to meet in that way at that time, and always will have.