Oh, and I'm trusting ToonyMan in his claim. Samus's powers were mentioned earlier and Breadie is buddying. Also Tylui was defending Breadbox until he voted for him.
Unvote Archie. Vote Tylui.
I would be following this, but he said EXACTLY what Power Suit does. That's why I'm calling for them to do CRYPTIC!Claims of some type.
Yes, I've been thinking about this. My original vote on him was due to behaviour, but he successfully defended it with this very precise definition:
My Auto ability is this: "Power Suit: Players that target you are disabled the following Day."
Pandar, I can't think how "cryptic claims" can be trustworthy enough for you to make a definitive call. Rather, the opposite should happen. If I may:
Unvote Tylui.
ToonyMan, I dare you to give an equally precise description of either "Morphball" or "Missile", including its (when-to-use) in parenthesis, and as close to the real description as possible to be compared against Pandar's list. If you can't, then you are lying.
If ToonyMan can, indeed, produce the above, then... is there a way that Tylui or ToonyMan could know it that precisely and still be the Webadict? The only way I can think of is if the cultist hit the real Samus and Breadbocks earlier with the "King of the Mafia" role switch power, and had the details told to him via cultchat. I don't know how to decide then, but this situation
only arises if Toony is able to produce the
precise ability description.
So, how 'bout it,
ToonyMan? Are you feelin' lucky, punk?