You try to find out what everyone else has gotten for their roles during the Night.
Well, we've all gotten one shots, we might as well plan it out to get the best results. Plus, I don't trust them.
You ask from whom Solifuge got his information.
Easily the most questionable of my actions, but I still stand by asking who told Solifuge that information, yes. Note, though, that I only care if the person who told Solifuge this already knew the information before it was sent.
And you ask what I learned from my role. I mean, you know you're a goner, so why not take what you can from the Town, right?
You've already claimed getting information each night, so the only reason you WOULDN'T claim it now is if you were scum.
You're also saying that a THIRD PARTY is sending Solifuge secret information to make me (Am I scum according to your reasoning) look Town. ... Riiiiiiight.
Could be scum, I guess, but that seems too obvious, if you ask me. I'm pretty sure whoever sent it isn't town, in any event.
I mean, if I were a third party, that'd be the PERFECT way to make myself look Town. Also, you wish to lynch the source of this, so that instead of scumhunting or anything useful, we can waste a lynch proving someone who will die the next Night. Thumbs up for the reasoning.
Actually, anonymously telling someone that you're not scum is a pretty good way to confirm yourself since most of the people here are gullible sheep who'll accept Occam's Razor arguments as valid.
I don't know about you guys, but I most certainly have a protection, so if we prove Webadict, I can guaran-fucking-tee that Webadict will be protected if he gets confirmed. Now, if these 1-shots do as they say, I dunno, but I'll risk it.
I told Org to vote whoever because that's the logical thing for him to do. Seriously, if I had a choice between scum Mr.Person or scum Toaster, I'd lynch scum Mr.Person. This is a pretty straightfoward case and does not affect whether I'm scum or not.
I'm not even going to continue this because you're defending yourself against an attack I'm not making anymore.
And I had the majority (Or perhaps I was tied), when I said that. Some of us have to make cases. If I wanted myself lynched, I wouldn't post a HUGE LIST OF INFORMATION. My God! Call that WIFOM, but everyone knows I was the clear shot to be lynched. Maybe not for good reasons, but I was the obvious lynch, no? Using a hindsight bias now just makes your argument terrible and scummy.
Again, I'm not making that attack anymore. I don't ignore possibilities just because they're unlikely, I was just checking.
Either way, even if it's not the true definition of WIFOM, it is scummy in all accounts. You're basically trying to defame me or make yourself look better from my lynch. You're covering yourself because you knew I would come up Town, and with your attacks being repeatedly shot down, you needed something, so you tried to say that I was basically scum when I die and show up Town.
First off, I'm the one that's been shooting YOUR attacks down.
Second, at the time, you had never tried to shoot any of my attacks down because I HADN'T MADE ANY AT THAT POINT! Holy shit, you're trying to argue I called you a PotC because I was getting frustrated my attacks weren't sticking when that was my FIRST ATTACK ON YOU!
And if you're going to complain about me not asking me questions, then how about deal with straight-up findings that I perceive and you can debate their accuracy as we're currently doing. Or is that too scummy of me?
At the time, you hadn't asked any questions. That's what I'm saying, and you can't debate that your first response was "You sure are acting scummy" and nothing else, which is passive as all fuck. Afterwards, you were all like "Oh, you're scum", but your FIRST response was no questions, no accusations, passive statement only.
Afterwards, I have indeed been debating with you, unless you think we're just having a pleasant chat.
You're then trying to justify my scumminess using meta, which is an okay justification if it weren't about two months old.
So you're trying to say that you COMPLETELY change how you play every two months? No trace of your old style? Not even a hint of how you used to play? Excuse me while I laugh at your retarded lie.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Oh man, Webadict, that's a good joke. Ok, so what's your SERIOUS defense?
It's also fallacious in that it assumes Correlation Implies Causation. You're assuming that my freak-out there is caused SOLELY by calling me a Jester, as opposed to having built-up anger over being not listened to and being ganged-up on by several people for it. It's the same thing for Cheeetar's post where I did that huge anger post as scum: I needed people to swear at me there.
So, it works if most of your argument weren't built upon it.
So you were being listened to here, where you were this close to being lynched? Oh wait, no, you were being ganged up on in here, too, and at the time, almost nobody wanted to lynch the players you wanted lynched.
And I do call you scum. Several times. So much that I switch to you being my chainlynch target. Why didn't you bother quoting that?
I was answering Cheeetar's question about why I thought you were scum. And remember, all that stuff before was about your FIRST RESPONSE, not your later ones.
Author
Topic: Bay 12 Mafia - Night Three - Low Resolution - 2 replacements needed (Read 61750 times)