Would you like for me to re-post where I explained why I think you're scum?
If you think you already did that, no. I've already read it. I don't read it as 'I think imp is scum' and especially not 'for reasons'.
I have no idea if talking to you even can be productive.
This one's just insult/bullying/you venting hostility, and it's false.
I'll start off with the obvious part of that no one really needs a case against you.
This one's just insult/bullying/you venting hostility, and it's false.
Your removal is a net benefit to Town regardless of whether you are Town or not.
This one's a you problem, and something you should maybe work on, because it can drive players away from the game. Wonder if I'm the only one you find so impossible to tolerate?
Personally, I want to policy-execute you every game, and I try hard to fight the itch of immediately calling for your execution at the beginning of games.
This one's a you problem, and something you should maybe work on, because it can drive players away from the game. Wonder if I'm the only one you find so impossible to tolerate?
It biases my judgment, and it doesn't make you get any better, so I generally just try to ignore you, lest I unleash a torrent of probably deserved insults your way.
This one's false, ignores my reasoning and actual case. You are correct, my timing fits your statement here, but no, that is not my reason or my only reason. And I've stated my case against you.
However, the issue here is that the only reason you're really voting for me is that I insulted you.
You can say that, doesn't make it true. I mean, there's even a name for this kind of attack and illogic.
The reason I believe that is because your evidence continues to fall apart upon any amount of scrutinizing or interrogation.
Not particularly, but I do look for information at all times. And this is NAI, for me and others.
You are looking for evidence after-the-fact.
Not sure of your reasoning here, but the whole of your 'case' as to 'why I am scum' hasn't even been made yet.
It does not appear to factor into your decision at the moment.
It may feel this way to you. You're wrong. And I don't 'always' go for you. I am genuinely concerned about you, and increasingly so, this game.
This makes your case feel disingenuous, and it's not particularly surprising, since I'm always an easy target because people can't read me.
This is interesting. Do you think it's because you can 'refill Qua, under some circumstances, and think Qua can stop the mafia kill?' I'm not convinced that Qua directly said that, and meant it as a blanket case. Qua specifically said they might be able to save toony, and definitely would be able to stop the mafiakill, but is that even correct? Does Qua even know? I think the two are linked. I wonder if Qua misread what Toony said and thought the mafiakill for sure would be coming at Toony, which maybe Qua means Qua can do something about. Your presumptions about this remind me of scum Hector last game, presuming and puffing up my claim of being able to 'cure the poison'. Totally not what I said there, very scummy, very scummy of you too. And Hector was scum when he misread and abused my statements there too, and you're doing a very similar garbage presumption claim of what Qua said.
Or maybe you mean you have some other way to stop it. Great. Hope you do, if you're alive to. If it looks like you're working for town, if you're pro-town, I won't go for you. I'm going for you because of your anti-town-ness this game, in what I read of your posts and evaluations of others, and where your attention seems to be.
Additionally, I have a way to help stop the Mafiakill, and you seem to completely not care about this.
But I don't have it/one. And what you focused on was again, a misread of an ability that would not have worked as you state, and could have set up for a lot of problems for town/protected scum. It's highly abusable, and awful strategy, to my read. And my comparison to an item that could instant win - that's hypothetical. I don't have one. You misrepresent massively and without concern for town.
I could use the argument that you freaked out about having an instant win for Town, but I don't really care about that one.
Sure, but again, this is not how or why I'm scum.
The alternative take is that I find you incompetent, but both can be true.
None of your 'case for why I am scum' is 'evidence I am scum', as I understand that evidence. Half of it's direct insult, and calls for my death no matter my role. The other half is incorrect/bias/opinion/your emotion and nothing to do with if I'm scum or not.