Okay.
Re: the mansion: No, I'm not going to talk about it. Stop role fishing. I'll bring it up later when it's relevant, and I think it will be relevant later, too.
Re: my lack of posting: midterms. That said, I only have one difficult midterm left (and it's tonight). I should have the time and mental energy to make a few big posts a few hours from now. I plan to address a few big topics using those few big posts.
I'd vote Luckyowl for sheer lack of participation, but I don't want to bring him too close to hammer. I still want to use what's left of our day.
Re: scumminess: Oh, I'd totally vote myself if I weren't me. I'm aware that I look pretty scummy from the outside, and I'd agree with those reasons if I didn't know that I was town. So I don't blame y'all for voting me. That said, whoever put the least amount of effort into joining my wagon is probably scum. Same for whoever put the least amount of effort in hopping on the Lucky wagon.
If Lucky is scum, I wouldn't even be surprised if the scum didn't even try and save him. See: sheer lack of participation. It's not ideal for them, but Lucky is effectively a null lynch. Not much information is provided by his death, as opposed to Caz's, Tric's, NQT's, or even my own. They might even bus him to boost their reputations.
Luckyowl is an easy lynch. But maybe that's not the right choice. Removing a non-participant is a different thing from removing an active townie or someone who's actually mafia or a hostile third party. It's not as bad as the worst-case scenario, but it's not as good as the best-case scenario. It's null. It's easy.
And anyone who puts a minimal amount of effort into deciding who to lynch is scum.
Re: your brains:
Heya Tom it's Bob, from the office down the hall...