If Fallacy is scum, I'm sure NJW will be able to make a good argument for that case, but I can't leave this.
Less WIFOM filled, thank you.
"YOU CAN'T POINT TO ME BEING THE ONLY KILLER, THAT'S RIDICULOUS."
That's another strawman. I made my argument in my mega post and I'll gladly bring up the relevant excerpt again.
Those who say that I was the sole person attempting mafia nightkills are insane because why would the mafia cut their killing power in half? What gambit reward is worth doing that for?
Before we continue that train of thought, let's briefly entertain the idea that I acted alongside my buddies during day 1 and acted alone during day 2 for the sake of a gambit. If I did that, then I am increasing the chances of there being no kills that night since if something happens to me such as a block, protect, or a redirect, then there is no backup kill. Scum risk losing their most reliable ability for a gimmicky mindgame at a point where they succesfully busted the two masons alongside the modkilling on one of their most active townies (ie. Dolores).
Until now, you've been ignoring me bringing up the possibilities that your kills either replace the standard kill, or your buddies have been blocked each night, and keep insisting that it could only be from a gambit with you acting and ignoring the standard kill.
I replied to both of those possibilities. For the first one, I pointed out the fact that my kill leaves a calling card making it a shitty replacement, and when you countered with the idea that there may be other hidden bonuses to my nightkill that are worth the calling card, I responded promptly.
As for the possibility of my buddies being blocked each night, I concluded that it was a plausible scenario, but it would need to be proved with other evidence. Otherwise, you can't differentiate it from standard vigilante play. The vigilante is a normal mafia role you know? I dug up that quote in a previous response to you, but I don't have the time to do it again.
I can't be bothered to read the entire wall, when what I do read is enough wine to get me drunk.
So you're admitting to not doing your best to help the town? During LYLO? Maybe you haven't realized this yet, but if you lynch the wrong guy we lose! Scum have a strong advantage here and will use every trick they can to make you lynch a townie! And you can't be even be bothered to fully read a post?! If I wasn't already convinced you were scum I'd be screaming at you in all caps!
The worst case scenario is that you overlook a good point being made by a townie and get him lynched. Another thing that happens is that it makes you look bad, which could get you lynched and also cost the town a victory if you're town.
This kind of half-assed posting is a blatant scum tell, and do you know which scum you remind me of Nirur? You remind me of Jim.
You're scum, so I don't need to spend the time and energy twisting my mind trying to follow logic with missing foundations.
The worst case isn't overlooking a good point made by a townie. The worst case is getting taken up by letting scum convince me with pretty logic, while ignoring a basic point that undercuts their arguments.
If your mind is so feeble and gullible that you can't let yourself properly read a post because you're afraid of being convinced by bad scum logic, then you shouldn't be playing mafia. Period. Publicly destroying bad scum logic is how you clue the rest of the town into the fact that a person is scum and get them to vote for you.
Mafia is a game social deduction and analyzing posts. Refusing to analyze posts is refusing to play the game.
But that isn't true. It's an actual case against Leafsnail that he chooses to ignore, and what do you know? Leafsnail pulls out a holdout pistol once the main argument for lynching me collapses and the Town starts to turn against him. How can you not see this as an attempt by !ScumNirur Torir to defend his buddy?
It is true. It is WIFOM. "If we were scum we would have done this" is almost always WIFOM, and there's no need to put it into an attack against Leafsnail of all people. I suppose it wasn't exactly flipfloppy away from NJW, however.
Leafsnail of all people....
Leafsnail of all people.
Leafsnail is all but confirmed scum!
Yes.
Thus, there's no need to use confusing logic to vote for him, and doing so is suspicious.
He was only revealed as scum because of my case and Trickmagic revealing Excalibur. I pursued a suspicion and it brought fruit. It was everything but unnecessary.
What I am attacking is your idea that !townyou would have placed a vote and risked a quickhammer without considering the feelings of the rest of the town.
But I didn't. Please explain your problem with me putting a vote on you that didn't put you in quickhammer range.
More misrepresentations. I accused you of believing the weak Fake Excalibur argument. You countered by saying that you didn't believe it, saying that if you believed it you would have placed a vote. I countered by saying that even if you did believe it, !toownyou still wouldn't have placed the vote since it would risk getting me hammered.
Now you're saying that I have a problem with you placing a vote. No TIME!