It'd be nice to see the percentage of recent Stop The Steal events that were peaceful. A minority wholly invested in invading and physically disrupting[2] seats of government, both local and national, should be compared wisely against fringes[1] of a more groundswell protest causing damage.
Normally, I'd expect the former to be taken more seriously than the latter (whether or not I'd agree with that). Shooting an elected official in the foot tends to be dealt with more severely than shooting your own, or a relative's, foot.
(So... Bets on POTUS #46 being Pence? As I said a while ago, in different context, I'm not sure he'd prefer to go for that, but maybe this forces matters, either by an impssibly-quick re-Impeachment[3] and ⅔rds confirmation or just via one or other of the measures in the 25th. Republicans can't remove Trump (as many now no doubt want to do, including Pence) without at least offering Pence first refusal.)
[1] A fair few times proven to be triggered by agents provocateur. One of the claims I saw regarding the Capitol was that a person seen there had been seen in photos in BLM violence, therefore BLM was false-flagging this latest event. Execept that has long since self-identified as on the Trump side and so, if anything, this actually cements his prior presence in BLM context as provocative/trouble-making.
[2] Let's call it vandalism and looting, at the very least. Not sure they got as far as arson, and we don't precisely know what weaponry (from firearms down to improvised missiles) were used/threatened to gain access.
[3] "We're breaking records bigly, folks! No other President has ever been impeached twice..."