I don't see any internationalist rats. I just see a realist giving a fair warning.
I grow bored of pointing this out but the EU has been sabotaging the borders of European countries, threatening European countries who enforce their borders for as long as it's been able and has been pursuing policies for diversity for diversity's sake. Perhaps I should not even specify the EU, as this is just one component of the larger progressive moment that merely gained new toys with the European Union to play with. It is a plan achieving fruition. It was guest workers, it was a multicultural experiment, it was a Mediterranean boat crisis, it was an open asylum process, it was a libyan war, it was a syrian war e.t.c.
This is another globalist, making diversity for all nations, even those in the most remote regions of the planet. Why? Fuck you, diversity. Those in the UK will be familiar that our Labour gov under New Labour actively sought migrants from abroad for mass migration for the sole purpose of permanently changing the ethnic makeup of Britain, why? Because they wanted to permanently change the ethnic makeup of Britain for diversity. It's a very confusing thought process, but they hold diversity to be an inherent virtue and so pursue it irregardless of the consequences.
Or again, because it must bear repetition if it must, Germany. Why does Merkel block the classification of the Balkans as safe, whilst saying multiculturalism has failed? Why did she approve an open asylum border across all of Europe when even in her home country, the majority had said migration had gone too far? Why is it after she said Germany had to arrest the rate of migration she adopted the Samson plan, which would once more stop other European nations in addition to Germany from stopping this migration? How can she talk in one sentence of Germany losing her social core, and in the next plan for merely replacing illegal mass migration with regular legal mass migration?
How many decades, how many countries, how many politicians, how many speakers, how many think tanks, how many Guardian ops, how much does it take to show they did it on purpose and are proud of it? I know the ESI are proud of their timeline, I may seek to add to theirs.
Can you honestly hear him talking about peaceful Europe with a straight face in the age where our peaceful cities are bombed by terror cells we had ample warning were coming
home? Where police will cover up the most horrendous atrocities in numbers that should be impossible because they do not want to harm the narrative, and rather than expose it the media will collude with them with Councillors - threatening victims with lethal and legal consequences? This is the Europe they made, that they want to preserve? Haha, I mean we need only look at how 26 years ago the notion of Europeans being replaced in Europe was laughable, impossible, the stuff of jokes, 10 years ago it had already happened in major cities like London, 1 year ago even for smaller counties like Skåne, to today where in 3 years by current rates (which are increasing), Germany as a whole nation could well be minority German once the over 20s die.
This is no realist giving a fair warning, this is the man in charge warning those who wish to stop him that they will fail, for his ilk are now so powerful they need not pretend anymore. That his opponents are now also powerful enough to stop his ilk's projects just makes things more interesting. One need only look at how they went from reframing the multicutural experiment to the refugee crisis, to changing the stats on the refugee crisis to diminish its impact as much as possible, to just outright having the most powerful bureaucrat in Europe saying you cannot reject diversity or your society will be brought down.
The thing I hate about this is they never asked anyone honestly if they wanted this, they decided it was best for them and they and their descendants would live with it for their ambition, and they would only reveal their intentions once everything could no longer be undone. I remember writing a few years earlier of how Europeans only wanted to act when it was out of their power to act, it seems I was wrong. I had thought the root cause was apathy, but over the years it just became abundantly clear that the same progressive school of thought that ran my nation runs Europe and beyond, and that European politicians acting only when it was out of their power to act has merely been the product of deliberate self-sabotage, with this going back before even 2013, before even 2008, before even 2000.
Also rather disturbing, Europe is easily diversified as there are few Europeans and what few are left are cancerous, but what is their plan for the likes of the Chinese?
In my case, it is a deep lack of trust that the internationalist agenda will not result in violent revolt and war that will kill countless thousands of innocent people. There are millions of people in Europe who will not accept the destruction of their cultural and national identities, and will fight to preserve them. Perhaps we should not poke the bear.
Perhaps Eastern Europe, but the number of apathetic Europeans and supportive ones, especially amongst the heavily Uni-educated youth are both without ability or desire, being in favour of the internationalist agenda. I have long maintained that Europe's future will not be Europeans vs Migrants, but Migrants vs Migrants, as Europeans outside of the East are irrelevant, a mass of atoms. Irregardless, if any troubles go down it will be as civil decay, not war. The usual terrorism, honour killings, authoritarian ineptitude, ethnic tension and non-consensual enrichment that will result in the deaths of innocent factions killing innocent factions whilst the people who started it all lie long dead, probably having died peacefully in their sleep in a comfy American villas from old age. No matter what comes of newEurope, it cannot get to fighting, if it gets to that everyone loses. We can deal with rivers of blood as long as they don't become permanent fixtures, and fighting will not stop globalists at all. There is also the issue of what everyone is fighting for, what is at stake. For the most wealthy of European nations I think fighting over culture and national identity is at this point a mistake (hahaha the Swedenats getting attacked by Swedes after becoming progressive is hilarious). Least of all because the cultures at stake are not worth preserving for the cost of going up against gargantuan globalists (the intellectual elite have too much control over culture, unless you're a slav) and the national identities currentyearuope has created are frankly, retarded and designed for infighting and manipulation (yeah, unless you think it's important getting in the arena with Jihadists, Nazis and Progressives over who gets to call themselves Belgian). Haha, had that revelation when people shat on Britain for not integrating its Muslims enough, and when I looked into it our Jihadists were wealthy, well-educated and very clearly of British culture (complaining that native Arabs stole their shoes, roflmao). It's a fight worth fighting yeah, but you don't fight Stalin and Hitler at the same time, pick priorities. I place the priority on survival, first and foremost.
Put genetics, culture, history, religion, national identity, what else have you and chuck it all aside. The most important thing for a country is that it survives and prospers, is free from the paralysis of terrorism, corruption and crime, and that its people can conduct civil society without fear of their children being kidnapped. This is something which unites everyone, survival instinct. It's why our migrant, working class, middle class and financial class dropped progressives like a poison napalm potato, because all four are united by a common desire to make bread, eat bread, give bread and go on about life. Arrest the collapse of social care, the European economy, the rule of law and then, only then argue over all of the former. I do not believe there is any room at all to waste time fighting over things already lost.
Couldn't help myself
I always say you're never too late for damage control. There is a lot of opportunity for new Europe, any victories on the former shit will be pointless if the underlying system that got us here does not merely reproduce itself.
Banter is now in some parrts of Europe seen as a threat. Banter comes with challenges. But banter is humanity's destiny. There is not going to be, even in the remotest places of this planet, a nation that will not see banter in its future. That's where humanity is heading. And those politicians trying to sell to their electorates, a society that is exclusively composed of Unidruges of from one gulag, are trying to portray a future based on anti-banter that never existed, therefore that future will never be. Europe will be cheeki, like all other parts of the world will be breeki, the only question is how do we deal with that chikki brikki. And my answer to that is by ensuring that our ethics determine how we deal with banter, and not giving up our ethics to refuse banter. That will bring us down as a society, if we don't get this right, I truly believe Europe will not remain the Europe her ancestors built. Europe will not remain the religion of peace and freedom for very long.
Author
Topic: The friendly and polite Europe related terrible jokes thread (Read 1104966 times)