Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[evilcherry]

The battle bus is too big.

a platoon can do so much more than a squad

And is also a easier target for their dive bombers.

[Elfeater]

The battle bus is too big.

a platoon can do so much more than a squad

And is also a easier target for their dive bombers.

So give each squad in a platoon a small IFV instead of a massive bus, which can get shot to hell by tanks, planes, etc...

[evilcherry]

The battle bus is too big.

a platoon can do so much more than a squad

And is also a easier target for their dive bombers.

So give each squad in a platoon a small IFV instead of a massive bus, which can get shot to hell by tanks, planes, etc...

No more vulnerable. At least not as vulnerable as a packed bus.

[Elfeater]

I am saying having multiple APC sdkfz style vehicles is better than one bus.

[evilcherry]

I am saying having multiple APC sdkfz style vehicles is better than one bus.

I think we are converging there, though there is a strong case for full track, namely lower ground pressure so more useful in a Jungle.

[Elfeater]

I am still leaning towardsa finishing the flamer finally, and getting new camo during revision.

[Taricus]

Actually I think we should save the flamethrower until we try making something akin to the churchill crocodile. Because that way we get a BIGGER flamer out of it

[Elfeater]

Actually I think we should save the flamethrower until we try making something akin to the churchill crocodile. Because that way we get a BIGGER flamer out of it

We have had the tech for a while though, it would give us jungle and city advantage.

[Taricus]

Maybe, but for two design turns on it, I think we'd be best served by making something rather... impressive with it's introduction.

[Elfeater]

Maybe, but for two design turns on it, I think we'd be best served by making something rather... impressive with it's introduction.

I would say a flamer is impressive enough to take the jungle and burn the bastards in our cities.

[evilcherry]

Fed up, honestly.

IFV, with flamethrower. We remove flamethrower in revision.

[Taricus]

I'm not voting for an IFV until we get back onto the deserts atleast. Until then, we need something geared towards close quarters and/or anti-tank

[evilcherry]

I'm not voting for an IFV until we get back onto the deserts atleast. Until then, we need something geared towards close quarters and/or anti-tank

And your armored car is worse than an IFV in most aspects except the derp gun.

[Baffler]

And there's no reason we couldn't make a Colt variant that has a Breaker cannon mount instead of machineguns and passenger space either.

[Taricus]

I'm not voting for an IFV until we get back onto the deserts atleast. Until then, we need something geared towards close quarters and/or anti-tank

And your armored car is worse than an IFV in most aspects except the derp gun.

And why is the 1.6 inch a derp gun exactly? Besides, the AC is also faster and also fills a role that the IFV can't (Reconnaissance).

At any rate, either design isn't that viable given the fact we're in close-quarters. We just can't afford to focus on armoured vehicles at the moment.