Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 176 177 [178] 179 180 ... 217

Author Topic: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1935 Production  (Read 162795 times)

Andres

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2655 on: August 18, 2015, 07:34:49 am »

If the pistol do get through, why don't we ask for hollow point bullets? They're the same used by our SMG, so we at least get something useful. And we need all the stopping power we have.
I'm against it because it's immoral and impractical. Everyone else is against it because it's impractical. Their armour would be enough to stop hollow point rounds by virtue of their being made of steel.

Glory to Arstotzka.
Logged
All fanfics are heresy, each and every one, especially the shipping ones. Those are by far the worst.

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2656 on: August 18, 2015, 07:49:08 am »

Morality is really no issue. We're using shrapnel, fragmentation grenades, bombing, land mines, and a whole lot of other stuff here. Hollow points have greater stopping power, sure.

And you know, hollow point is nowhere near as bad against armor as you want to make us believe. In fact, against light armor it's likely better as the rounds deformation prevents it from being deflected.
Logged

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2657 on: August 18, 2015, 07:50:04 am »

Everyone else being who exactly? Also, since when is shooting someone immoral?

Anyway, since it seems you guys want to spend the revision on the pistol, we might as well have a good-looking proposal.

Spoiler: AS-SP30 (click to show/hide)

I don't really see the point of using an inferior metal (aluminium) to shave a few grams from our handgun. Better to stick with what we have.
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

Andres

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2658 on: August 18, 2015, 08:00:21 am »

And you know, hollow point is nowhere near as bad against armor as you want to make us believe. In fact, against light armor it's likely better as the rounds deformation prevents it from being deflected.
"As much I want to make you believe?" I'm not trying to trick you guys or anything. I was told that hollow points don't work against armour from someone who used to go to a gun club. I'm not trying to be deceptive or anything. Whether their armour can be considered light or not is up for debate, though. How light could steel be, exactly?
Logged
All fanfics are heresy, each and every one, especially the shipping ones. Those are by far the worst.

andrea

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2659 on: August 18, 2015, 08:01:08 am »


fighter:            Kot
ammunition:     ebbor, Sheb,Andrea
ghillie suit:      Andres(1)
pistol:            tryrar, quake, VoidSlayer,Andres(3)


throwing my vote to ammunition. However, pistol revision is Andres's tertiary vote and since neither of his 2 other votes are winning,I suppose that goes to the pistol as well...

do we really need a pistol? let our men throw punches or something.

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2660 on: August 18, 2015, 08:01:56 am »

10ebbor10, are you willing to write the ammo proposal?

Andres what are your votes exactly?
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

Funk

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2661 on: August 18, 2015, 08:23:24 am »


fighter:            Kot
ammunition:     ebbor, Sheb,Andrea
ghillie suit:      Andres(1)
pistol:            tryrar, quake, VoidSlayer,Andres(3),Funk

+1 to the Pistol.
Just makeing sure my vote get counted.
Logged
Agree, plus that's about the LAST thing *I* want to see from this kind of game - author spending valuable development time on useless graphics.

Unofficial slogan of Bay 12 Games.  

Death to the false emperor a warhammer40k SG

10ebbor10

  • Bay Watcher
  • DON'T PANIC
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2662 on: August 18, 2015, 09:27:49 am »

So, another ammo proposal.

Ammo Revision

Advanced HEAT : An improved Heat shell with a relatively strong metal aerodynamic cap. Intended to fly straight foremost, and defeat armor secondly.
HEFI-T : A specialist autocannon round. High explosive fragmentory incendairy explosive
Fuzed APHE : An armor piercing high explosive round. Has less penetration than normal AP rounds, but explodes inside the enemy vehicle.
AS-2T : A 2 ton bomb for blowing up stuff.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2015, 10:28:28 am by 10ebbor10 »
Logged

andrea

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2663 on: August 18, 2015, 09:41:09 am »

that bomb, made for our bomber... lovely, just lovely.
frag/incendiary autocannon round seems great for our autocannon bases air combat.

I vote for that, but sadly we are still outnumbered 5 to 3. for the tiny handgun.

I want my 2 ton bomb, not a 200 grams handgun! ( numbers for the handgun compeltely made up)

Kot

  • Bay Watcher
  • 2 Patriotic 4 U
    • View Profile
    • Tiny Pixel Soldiers
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2664 on: August 18, 2015, 09:56:09 am »

Woah, woah, woaaaah!
I'm away for 12 hours and suddenly you're fixing the pistol... well, uh, whatever. It's not like that we can ignore the thing forever... okay, primary vote for the ammunition, secondary for the pistol but we should also try and make a suppresor to it.
Logged
Kot finishes his morning routine in the same way he always does, by burning a scale replica of Saint Basil's Cathedral on the windowsill.

andrea

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2665 on: August 18, 2015, 10:26:48 am »

sure, we can ignore it. We were ignoring it happily until it got briefly named on a cmmand report for the first time in a decade.

tryrar

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2666 on: August 18, 2015, 10:29:02 am »

Ahem, I'd like to bring up something Sensei brought up:

Yeah, which really sucks for that 4 times a years when a soldier have to use its pistols. Pistols weren't even issued to most infantrymen in WWII, and all the troops which need a sidearm (Artillerymen, pilots, snipers...) can just grab a AS-MC16A.

We should just obsolete that pistol.

Yeah, an SMG isn't small enough to be a sidearm unless it's the size of an Uzi...which the MC16A ISN'T.
I should post this in the main thread as well, this has been my logic for soldier equipment.

A typical soldier has a primary weapon (EG rifle), a sidearm, and whatever equipment seems reasonable (spare ammo, grenades, binoculars and such are all examples of miscellaneous equipment). The AS-MC16 is a primary weapon, using it deprives a soldier of any other rifle. Soldiers who carry machine guns, the bulky radios currently in use by both nations, and things like that are also deprived of a primary weapon and forced to rely on their sidearm. In close combat, soldiers who have a long rifle or other unsuitable gun (the MC16 is of course suitable for close combat) will use their sidearms, and sometimes have to use their sidearms instead of reloading.

So, a sidearm that actually functions is kinda actually important. So let's use this opportunity to fix it and never have to worry again.
Logged
This fort really does sit on the event horizon of madness and catastrophe
No. I suppose there are similarities, but I'm fairly certain angry birds doesn't let me charge into a battalion of knights with a car made of circular saws.

andrea

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2667 on: August 18, 2015, 01:27:15 pm »

I will note that in places where most cqc occurs, many soldiers will have the SMG, protecting those who don't. And only because something is good, it doesn't mean that something else isn't better. I'll be very surprised if the handgun gets featured significantly in the next reports. I think it will just be a small mention that we have it and little more.  I really hope to be wrong since we are blowing a revision on it.

How often has their superior hangun been mentioned in combat reports since we introduced SMG?

Sheb

  • Bay Watcher
  • You Are An Avatar
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2668 on: August 18, 2015, 02:39:18 pm »

Ok, I've done two versions of the Ammo revision proposal, since it seems to me that better RPG rocket performance and better shells are two different type of revision.

Spoiler: AS-RPG28-B (click to show/hide)

Spoiler: Shells (click to show/hide)
Logged

Quote from: Paul-Henry Spaak
Europe consists only of small countries, some of which know it and some of which don’t yet.

VoidSlayer

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Arms Race, Arstotzka: 1931 Revision
« Reply #2669 on: August 18, 2015, 04:14:59 pm »

I want that new pistol, but those RPG redesigns are so nice.
Pages: 1 ... 176 177 [178] 179 180 ... 217