Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

New player(s), sure

6 (42.9%)

Eh, 10 is large enough

4 (28.6%)

I'm not a player and want to see results all the time

4 (28.6%)

Total Members Voted: 14

[F.O.E.]

Julia:

12, 1, 70, 95, 3, 46, 44, 60

+HP, STR, LCK, RES, SPD

25, 39, 86, 89, 30, 22, 87, 59

+HP, STR, LCK, DEF, SPD

Ye boi

[Twinwolf]

Meh.

[SeriousConcentrate]

Don't worry Gate. Taft is sexist as well as racist, insofar as he disdains every equally.

[Gaterhyme]

It's got nothing to do with me - that's just her opinion. And towards both of them, no less. P:

But I suppose that does sound like another idiom: if you must be a dick, be an equal opportunity dick.

[SeriousConcentrate]

Ah, I thought you didn't want to step on the support. I'd be happy to get one with Miki as well; it would be kind of funny for all three archers to have one if you ask me.

[Gaterhyme]

I'm not sure if anyone has a support yet, actually.

And nah, I try to keep OOC out of IC, and vice versa. Thanks for thinking about my possible feelings, though. P:

[SeriousConcentrate]

Fair enough then, just thought I'd offer. ^^^

[Gaterhyme]

Supports will happen as they will! I didn't mean for you take my last comment as a rejection of possible supports - my "nah" and "keep[ing] OOC out of IC" comments were towards your (well-intentioned but incorrect) assumption that my IC posts reflected that I "didn't want to step on the support."

It'd be cool if supports happen. If they don't, they don't.

taft x shilleka though

Of course, I could be misinterpreting your last post, in which case I'm very sorry for monopolizing the OOC thread with silly things again, and I'll shut up now. ><

[SeriousConcentrate]

Nah it's cool dude, OOC is for talking about game-related stuff. It's not like we're spamming it talking about anime or which Friday the 13th movie is best part 4 is or whatever. And I got you correctly, I just meant Miki's still welcome to come along with Taft and Belenus if she wants to; I'm completely open to people RPing more, trust me.

taft x shilleka nevar D:<

[SeriousConcentrate]

Double post time. We might as well hash out rules for this little contest to save Sword some work; here's what I had in mind:

First round: Shooting from 10 yards (roll under 80 to hit)
Second round: Shooting from 30 yards (under 60)
Third round: 50 yards (under 40)
Fourth round: 75 yards (under 20)
Fifth round: 100 yards (Under SKL)

Of course you'll need your levels rolled before we can do that, since right now Taft would have 2/3x as much of a chance to hit at 100 yards as Benelus Belenus (sorry, my brain don't work right sometimes, just ask Darvi about Wyman) and that's not fair. Also wondering whether or not it would be a good idea to add SKL to each of the previous target goals (under 80+SKL for example) to incorporate character stats. The loser would be the first who can't hit a target in two tries, though I suppose if we do get to 100 yards then it would just be whoever misses twice first loses.

Sound good?

Also I'll be a good loser but Taft totally won't :p

[Blade Master Model 42]

I'd say add SKL to each shot.

[Swordstar]

I was gonna set up some rules for it, but I'll prolly talks and modify yours. I'll be doing the rolling etc

[Blade Master Model 42]

Deus, Kaltsar and Edgar went away from the group to quietly discuss the nature of the letter.

[Deus Asmoth]

Ah, right. Edited.

[Gaterhyme]

First round: Shooting from 10 yards (roll under 80 to hit)
Second round: Shooting from 30 yards (under 60)
Third round: 50 yards (under 40)
Fourth round: 75 yards (under 20)
Fifth round: 100 yards (Under SKL)

here's hoping they all roll >80 on the first six rolls

Question, though: why didn't we just use Hit? All three currently use an iron bow, so differences in Weapon Hit won't matter, and Hit already takes into account SKL*2. Plus, they're literally trying to hit a target. It does also take into account LCK/2, though, so maybe we don't want to bring luck into the equation, and maybe it would be a bit weird to signify further targets as having more Evasion to make them harder to hit. (Also full disclosure: while it's not the reason I asked this, Miki does have higher LCK growth than the other two.)

I haven't got any real objections to the system already proposed though.