Extend PFPHas your vote always been under the assumption of active lurking? It has been that way since this WHOLE GAME.
Pretty much, though it's grown stronger as you reply with more and more fluff and dodging. There's also the fact that your reads, on day 3, are but puffs of air. (That is, not very strong at all, despite being fairy wordy.) You're trying to wiggle out of a lynch, but you're not really scumhunting. The most solid contributions you've given have been setup spec, which is a common place for scum to hide and pretend to contribute from.
I keep getting this feeling that the votes from ZU and Toaster on me during D2 were supposed to be a threat for voting Tiruin. (Considering they both accused me of having weak/toothless votes/cases or exclusively targeting lurkers.) Then when D3 comes along, you vote me with all kinds of spectacle and hold onto this big post that you claim has all this analysis. When you finally post it, the brunt of it is that I'm targeting you for active lurking and that I find people who post but don't contribute actual content to be scummy.
Well, yeah. I do. Because active lurking and pretending to contribute while decidedly not doing so IS SCUMMY.
You could first do some analysis of yourself before you begin judging others--by far, your vote has no substance over me; the first time I've asked you that question was to gauge your degree of thought into the question, and by far I found that you had already judged me instead of treated me like how I first assumed your situation (ie that Philosophy I linked).
By far, your analysis has gone under
continuous bias--evident by that 'assumption of deflection', when the connection between such people and me have not even been expounded further; as present, they are merely
feelings given that despite your insistence on me, you haven't even delved into them as a comparison. All those accusations of active lurking and otherwise? Unproven.
Basically, its been nudging by intuition all game. You have no proof that I'm scum, yet are acting like I'm guilty and using that leverage to provide substance towards your vote. What proof do you have at all?
Nothing.
It all just
feels like I'm doing all this, because you've chosen to assume instead of analyze. In the proceedings until now, those 'suspects' (which sounds more like you're treating them like a lighthearted accomplice rather than an actual read) haven't been put into focus by you, but rather your focus has been on me serves as your crux, and notably a facade of a case because that's all you can push--in regards to your vote, anyway, there's a notable lack of substance to it; you've been questioning my reads and that's good, as well as poking me towards how I see others, but that's described as passive analysis: the problem of me prior to now is that you've got nothing, so other than assume a stance otherwise open, you put the idea of lurking and active [whichever] in order to make some leverage there.
To make me speak?
The motive is questionable at least. The living notepad hovers over my shoulder here--I've made a replica of the lurkertracker on your posts to really check your consistency and so far it has been...continuous. But lacking towards others, if the same degree of judgement to me is sincere.
If you're curious, this is the hypothetical situation I was musing over.
. . .
So~
Results of musing? Because its a big blank (prior to Medium confirmation...)
Author
Topic: Paranormal 24 - Game over! Doppelganger Victory! (Read 219622 times)