Deathsword came into the game somewhat late, responding to two questions from the RQS after the whole 4mask/flabort kerfuffle had started. (He made no comment on it and doesn't appear to have made any comment on .)
That post ended with the words of 'More Soon' which he failed to deliver quite... Spectacularly. His next post didn't come until roughly 27 hours later, and was neither soon or more, it consisted of a pointless statement and a single question directed at pisskop. The next post was just a single question directed at pisskop, (as well as a vote) and the next after
that was... Also a single question directed at pisskop. That is
everything (unless I'm about to gloriously make a fool of myself by missing something) he has contributed to this thread thus far. None of those questions were followed up on in the slightest, and whole normally I'd say that's understandable, given such a low amount of content and such hard tunneling, I don't think it's excusable without at least some sort of explanation.
Interesting to note is that the reasoning for him beginning to vote for pisskop to begin with.
This was the exchange leading up to it.
Here, pisskop was responding to my explanation of why it seemed I 'knew about the PM before it revealed' (which was really just him missing something on one of Flabort's posts.)
Ohh. >.< Still. I don't like you for other reasons.
I responded to that with
Please elaborate, keeping these things to yourself doesn't help anyone.
Deathsword followed
immedtiately after (3 minutes later) with
Which are...? You letting your vote hang of UXLZ for reasons known only to yourself and that, it seems, you are unwilling to share, pisskop
Firstly, nowhere did it seem to me that pisskop was 'unwilling' to share his reasons for suspecting me at the time. My take was more that he had chosen not to for some unknown reason (possibly fearing more people jumping on him)... Or simply didn't have any, hence my prodding of him to share.
Deathsword seemingly pulled the idea of this 'unwillingness' from thin air. There wasn't even enough time afterwards for him to have reasonably assumed that due to pisskop's silence, given the time between my post and his was a small 3 minutes. Between his and pisskop's, it was
five, still nowhere near enough (in my opinion) for their to be any implied signs of 'unwillingness.'
It also seems to be an act of either attempting to buddy me or chainsaw defending in an effort to try and buddy with me.