Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 755 756 [757] 758 759 ... 2205

Author Topic: Einsteinian Roulette: OOC and NEW PLAYER INFO  (Read 2489213 times)

Unholy_Pariah

  • Bay Watcher
  • [ETHIC:LOOTING:MANDATORY]
    • View Profile
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11340 on: November 23, 2014, 12:24:16 am »

@Radio

Hmm.  You do have a good point, that sending the PM to the Sword would accelerate our understanding of it, but I think that if people started messing with it on Heph we would get more data overall.  Primarily because we have flesh sods, which should make good, reliable, non-variable test subjects, which we can also feed basically anything we want to.  Random convicts have the issue that they vary between people, wouldn't (in general) be willing to take just any pill, aren't reliably available, ect.


True, but be honest: with all the shit you guys have to do, will you ever get around to it in a reasonable time? Besides, you wanna mess with it, you just tell Simus, she asks Miya for it back, and he'll ship it back to Hep toute suite. So, Hep peeps lose nothing, ship people get to hurt themselves some more but productively.
theres also the fact that the guy in charge of flesh sods feels the sods are too valuable to waste on experimentation.
Logged
Clearly running multiple missions at the same time is a terrible idea.  The epic battle to see which team can cock it up worse has escalated again.

And Larry kinda gets blueballed in all this; just left with a raging bone spear and no where to put it.

Nikitian

  • Bay Watcher
  • ~_~
    • View Profile
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11341 on: November 23, 2014, 03:50:47 am »

By the way, what are your predictions on the length of time until current batch of missions ends, people? And which will come the last one?
So far, M17 seems a strong contestant for the most lengthy one of the three, if only because considerable amount of combat and methodical destruction appears to lie ahead. That said, I'm not fully aware of other missions development at this point, so might be mistaken.
Logged
Past Sigs
Nikitian kneels in front of his computer, fresh lamb's blood on his hands, and prays to the dark powers for answers about armor thickness.

PyroDesu

  • Bay Watcher
  • Schist happens
    • View Profile
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11342 on: November 23, 2014, 03:59:58 am »

By the way, what are your predictions on the length of time until current batch of missions ends, people? And which will come the last one?
So far, M17 seems a strong contestant for the most lengthy one of the three, if only because considerable amount of combat and methodical destruction appears to lie ahead. That said, I'm not fully aware of other missions development at this point, so might be mistaken.

17 looks to be done first - they seem to be the only ones past a 'halfway point', so to speak - the transition from diplomacy to combat. I think 16's will be the setting in motion of the actual robbery, and 18... they're nowhere near their end, it looks like, unless PW gets bored of actions consisting of 'heat the cryovore'.
Logged
Quote from: syvarris
Pyro is probably some experimental government R&D AI.

piecewise

  • Bay Watcher
  • [TORTURE_FOR_FUN]
    • View Profile
    • Stuff
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11343 on: November 24, 2014, 03:42:52 pm »

I think if unequal power levels is a problem, you simply send the high-powers on different missions than the newbs.  Perhaps include one or two nice stand-outs to guide the newbs and provide firepower in a crisis, but it makes sense to send the best of the best on tough, dangerous, otherwise impossible missions and the rookies on missions that are less potentially rewarding and dangerous.  From each according to their ability after all!
Well, as I said, one thing we could do is have missions specifically geared toward higher level players. Or, if we don't wanna exclude people, have missions where it is explicitly stated you need to be this tall to enter the ride clad yourself in a few ton of phallic compensation in order to really stand a chance. But I'm not sure that'd be a very elegant solution.
Missions geared toward higher level players, in which things are much more fatal. Alright.

I'd just like to see them be a little less indestructable.  Look at faith on the long mission previously.  Wounded multiple times, and it's irrelevant limb damage, and pops out unharmed after a massive amount of gunfire by half a dozen players, including some pretty powerful weapons.  Sure, in theory someone like that could die, but synthflesh bodies and armor act both as reduction in damage taken, and as extra lives preventing critical damage, downgrading what would be a permadeath or temp-death into a less-lethal hit that wouldn't kill a normal player.

Basically, it downgrades a critical killing blow into a limb shot, and then the limb shot might be further reduced from 'destroyed' to 'damaged'.  Hence, double-counting protection.

If there was a little more turnover, the gap wouldn't be so large...

Also, amp weapons don't seem to suffer from this kind of damage reduction, with orders like 'cut the enemy in half' and 'pop his skull off his spine' not being granted a similar defence roll.
Re-balance them to be squishier. Alright.


the problem isn't in the equipment's capabilities, but in the rolling system.

a new character is taking an extreme risk every time they use a weapon, or anything that could remotely be used as a weapon, or talks, or basically does anything. (slight bonus, no decomp)

a mid-grade character is still taking risks by doing those actions, but can slightly influence them to be overshots instead of critical fails. (moderate bonus, no decomp)

a high-end character auto-succeeds at everything (good bonus, with decomp)

the gap between the no-decomp mid-range character and a character with a decomp is where things become overwhelming.
Oversided bonuses and decomps unbalance things. Fair.

How would you handle it?

The Amp Specialist aesthetically and from a mechanical standpoint seems like he'd be a glass cannon, since they're bound to a wheelchair and barely responsive in any way other than violent space magic (though maybe they do charity work building houses in their spare time, who knows). Minmaxed into oblivion for offense, in fact. So probably my answer would be to let them keep the shitload of will points they probably have, but limit their multitasking skills severely so that they can do only one thing at a time, or maybe just limit the defensive potential of amp use. Make it so they can't float around without being defenseless at that moment, or set one guy's guts on fire while screwing the head off another one, or maybe just make it so defending yourself with an amp is a very impractical thing to do.

Also, like I said, amp-sight, without knowing the Big Ugly Terrible Truth, sounds like a cheap asspull to me, as it is an unexplained method through which Amp Specialists circumvent the human limitations of the amp, in that you need sensory ID of a target or at least an idea of their location to target them in the first place. So I wouldn't keep that as a thing that's possible, given how cheap it sounds from a gameplay perspective, and keep just their limited human senses as their method of orientation. And maybe even not limited human senses, but give them cameyes or sonars or something of that nature, depending on their readiness when deployed.

These limitations - frailty and inability to multitask (or at least limited defensive abilities) - leave the Amp Specialist still very powerful, since space magic is still extremely powerful, and he's got a practically unlimited supply of it, but also probably dependent on support from their squad, since while burninating hostiles they can't protect themselves and vice versa, and their bodies are atrophied enough that a stiff wind could snap them in half. It makes them actual combat specialists, while the Amp Specialist we saw on Hephaestus is an island, tactically speaking, with no need for support of any kind, at least not for the immediate engagement they're in, and that makes them perilously boring and annoying to deal with.

And if you feel that would make them too easy to deal with, well, that brings me to the next idea, which is the abandonment of cinematic tactics (swinging heat-blades, throwing shit at people, other visually impressive shenanigans) and going for the best effort-to-result ratios in attacks (like boiling somebody's medulla oblongata or raising their heart's temperature by some sixty kelvins). It seems kind of weird that people who've been trained (I presume) in the use of amps by professionals would operate in that manner, at least to me. I mean, pretty much every piece of advice given by the AM in terms of amp use has been categorically against this kind of nonsense. It makes sense for heatblades and stuff like that to appear in convict-performed overshots, since they're not expected to know any better and their enthusiasm often makes them more likely to use maneuvers inefficiently, but I can't see that same sort of naive enthusiasm in a guy who's almost literally been honed into a living weapon by a vicious totalitarian regime.

Then again, maybe they just really like their jobs a lot and have a flair for the dramatic, and are really a good approximation of Stacy put through military training. I don't know.

As for demigod friendly NPCs, I probably would scale back their demigodly natures. Not make them absurdly powerful, but perhaps reasonably powerful. The AM doesn't need to be an inhuman amp demigoddess with 30-something missions under her belt, stunning good looks and a seductive aura of deadly competence to keep players in line, maybe just somebody good enough to have a matter conversion amp and a mass manipulation amp, plus a propensity toward snark, a bit of common sense and a tendency to not suffer fools gladly. The Doctor, similarly, doesn't have to be a horrible eldritch being, since he'd quite frankly be way more intimidating if he was just a guy who's really good at what he does this entire time. I don't think it'd make them less interesting as characters, though that's really how I would handle it, and to be fair, for the Doctor the whole eldritch being thing seems way more relevant to the role he fills than the amp demigoddess thing seems for the AM, though once again that could just be the way we haven't found out how the AM fits into the bigger picture.

Of course, I'm just working off what I know. ER's universe, history and the core concept of space magic are still largely a mystery to all but a couple people who you've told the Big Ugly Terrible Truth to (at least that's what I assume you've told them to some extent). Maybe it all makes sense, as I've mentioned, and I'd probably believe you if you said it did if the whole truth is known.

How do we reign in the power of the high end character?

Or, let me put it to you like this: is it the problem that characters are superpowered, or is it that only certain ones are and they always seem to be the most useful. Ie Harry, did you dislike the Amp Specialist inherently, as an idea, or because it was an enemy that ordinary soldiers and players couldn't fight, one that basically had to be combated by Jim and Miya and their ilk?

Because if it's the first, you're kinda out of luck. The tech is there and both sides are gonna keep using and improving it, especially now. By the time the war ends, in whatever way it does, we're gonna be using artifact level equipment and battles are going to seem very odd in hindsight.

But if it's the second, then that might be exactly what you want, since it will mean that soldiers and average people will have a much better chance of being able to take out major threats.

It's not a problem at all that player characters are superpowered - they clambered through the ranks and earned their tokens fair and square - or that some characters are very powerful (the Doctor I'd hold up as a positive example). The Amp Specialist I dislike because there's an unsubtle undertone of cheapness to his abilities, he's beefed up beyond any form of reason without any form of (non-fluff, I know he probably doesn't like being filled with IVs and catheters, or looks forward to them being reinserted when he hovers out of his wheelchair and spreads his arms in a dramatic gesture, unless he's actually Stacy as previously mentioned and can't help being utterly chipper on the inside) drawback for it. Same for the AM. The problem is that there's no real rhyme or reason to fighting the Amp Specialist, there's just leveling enough firepower his way (and unlocking secret forbidden techniques through the power of seeing someone you sorta like die) until it feels like he's had enough (and the moment is suitably dramatic) and we've all learned a lesson today and also filled up at least three volumes with the big fight. Am I making sense here?

On another note, I'm not quite sure how people are taking away from this that high-powered player characters are somehow wrong and awful. There's, like, five of them who actually do much of anything anymore, and I'm not sure Miyamoto properly counts, since he's very courteously taken to administrative work, only two synthflesh people are actually doing balance-relevant stuff for any length of time (Auron and Pancaek, and both of them are fairly humble in their abilities), Xan's crippled until he kickstarts himself a decompensator and people with MK3s are only really distinguished by the fact that they can fly. I was just saying I really find it funny and inspiring when high-power player characters get mutilated, mess things up or ideally die horribly, especially if less powerful people are nearby and they immediately flip out, and came up with a further rationale extrapolated from Sean's interesting guess on the viewpoint. And then my seething hatred of the Amp Specialist and all he represents took hold of my fragile mind.
All good points.

I will say that the the AM's mission record, looks and abilities ARE explained via unknown game stuff (well, two people know it, but most don't) and that she does have a few very major weaknesses. Regardless, you'll never see her or the Doc doing their stuff for any reason other then story purposes. I have potential plans for them, but I generally think their OP nature is ok since they rarely if ever actually do anything with it. The doc has his reasons for being what he is too. I understand the fear though; it seems like long standing NPC's are often effected by an unconscious "Mary sue'ning" as time continues. I'll try to keep that reigned in and, if nothing else, to at least have a good explanation as to why they're like that, even if it isn't readily available. As a gesture of good faith, here are some things to ponder about the AM that might help guess her true nature.

1.Ship of Theseus
2.hybridization
3.effects similar to the one she users are actually available to players. Well, to one particular player in a certain circumstance.
4.Think about something you never see, a specific part of something that is otherwise pretty damn common.


What I think Harry is trying to say about the Amp specialist: make him less a Dragonball Z villain that just needs enough episodes of screaming and power-upping and finding the magic of friendship in order to beat him.

Instead, make it more a complex enemy that has strengths and weaknesses, that can utterly destroy you if you go about it badly but is quite manageable if you do it smartly and play to your advantages, and his disadvantages.

Sound about right Harry?

Quote
And if you feel that would make them too easy to deal with, well, that brings me to the next idea, which is the abandonment of cinematic tactics (swinging heat-blades, throwing shit at people, other visually impressive shenanigans) and going for the best effort-to-result ratios in attacks (like boiling somebody's medulla oblongata or raising their heart's temperature by some sixty kelvins). It seems kind of weird that people who've been trained (I presume) in the use of amps by professionals would operate in that manner, at least to me. I mean, pretty much every piece of advice given by the AM in terms of amp use has been categorically against this kind of nonsense. It makes sense for heatblades and stuff like that to appear in convict-performed overshots, since they're not expected to know any better and their enthusiasm often makes them more likely to use maneuvers inefficiently, but I can't see that same sort of naive enthusiasm in a guy who's almost literally been honed into a living weapon by a vicious totalitarian regime.

When it comes to players: I've been trying to play Miya as this, aka doing things the efficient way instead of the 'cool' way. Problem is that before I often got an overshot when trying to do something, and since I have a decomp I haven't really been on a mission yet. And finally, we run the risk of making things a tad bit boring, so a little flair is still a good thing I suppose.

for npc's though, if they all did this, it'd be a lot of non-blockable non-dodgable instakills. PW is cautious about doing that to his players too much I suspect.
This is actually one of the big problems I have with things. See, if I were writing this as a story, or a choose your own adventure where choices are limited, things would be very different. Amp specialists would just be guys with highly trained memories and spacial reasoning who would basically memorize the entire area they were guarding before hand and then, using cameras or other monitoring devices, perform highly concentrated precision attacks from a safe distance.

The problem with that is that even if I only attacked once each round, we'd probably end up with a TPK. How many turns of characters dropping dead without obvious cause would it take for the survivors to come up with a plan and run for it?

And even without something like that, what happens when you face up against a group of UWM soldiers and miyamoto gets dropped becomes someone scrambles the inside of his avatar?

If I were to use Amp users efficiently, I think we'd see AT LEAST one perma kill each time you encounter one in open combat. Hence, they use big stupid attacks that people can block and dodge and otherwise avoid.  I could always make them act consistantly and with the skills and powers they should have but...I dunno, it would be a pretty big ratcheting up in damage for you guys.

And I could say the same with sods and a lot of other things to be honest. A lot of the skills and powers of enemies are softballed to make them survivable.


HEY PIECEWISE!

is it possible to re-murder that skeleton and stick its skull in the pill machine?
Try it.
Quote
I'm gonna browse the wiki at one point and cheat, but my initial guesses would be Chem-Off, Battlesuit plate, the stuff they make civic longcoats out of, the stuff they make AoW cloaks out of-
Mk suit material maybe.

A lot of good options, but most are rather expensive. Mk suit material is what I had in mind. We've seen it is ridiculously resistant to temperature, and quite good at keeping out radiation to boot. And it's lightweight. And cheap! Mk.I suits are free, so you can just get a bunch of those, cut them up and use the resistant material to coat all of your bioconstruct minions in. You can throw away the rest, and just get a few sheets of the stuff (or maybe ask Steve for a big pile of it, whatever). Just as an additional subdermal layer, so that it doesn't hinder anything, and boom: instant weakness negation. For cheap, and you can then save the biomass you'd otherwise need.

But, how to adapt that for yourself, for when you don't wanna be bound to a single form? seeing as how the Mk suit stuff doesn't seem stretchy enough. Well, why not just cut it up into smaller sheets of it, add a small cell layer under each one that adheres to it through its ECM, and then use that mass of smaller sheets to give yourself a resistant outer/subdermal anti flame layer. And when a new form is needed, the smaller sheets can rearrange themselves to accommodate.

PW, would this work? As in, would it be effective, and would you allow it?

See, and then people are wondering why we keep that thing locked up. You're all criminally insane!

I think the background for Brother Lars clearly demonstrates that fact.



Oh shit!  BRILLIANT IDEA ALERT!

A new on-ship game... SCAVENGER HUNT!  Bring in a piece of Doctor or AM DNA to make a pill based on them!  Fun and prizes to be had by all!  See if you can track down Ivan to get a piece of him!  Get a piece of Steve!

Hell, I know where a piece of Steve('s avatar) is...

"You want a piece of this, huh, ya freaks? Well YOU AIN'T GETTIN' ANY!"
Questionable. I'd probably make you pay for it.











Hmm. Hyper competent High end guys like jim who never fail. My foreseen but ignored issue with d6 limitations. And enemies not fighting to their full potential.

I have ideas for this, but I'm not sure people, especially high end people, will like them.

Xantalos

  • Bay Watcher
  • Your Friendly Salvation
    • View Profile
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11344 on: November 24, 2014, 03:48:39 pm »

Oh dear.
Logged
Sig! Onol
Quote from: BFEL
XANTALOS, THE KARATEBOMINATION
Quote from: Toaster
((The Xantalos Die: [1, 1, 1, 6, 6, 6]))

Doomblade187

  • Bay Watcher
  • Requires music to get through the working day.
    • View Profile
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11345 on: November 24, 2014, 04:04:34 pm »

Personally, I feel that the high-end characters are balanced, but that's my point of view as never having run one. While they are very powerful, the tough enemies you (PW) send against them make them about good, I would say. Miya, Jim, and Renen are extrapowerful, but considering the first two are beginning to take a more 'commander' role, I' dont see too much problem with them at the moment.

What would those ideas be, if I may inquire?
Logged
In any case it would be a battle of critical thinking and I refuse to fight an unarmed individual.
One mustn't stare into the pathos, lest one become Pathos.

Radio Controlled

  • Bay Watcher
  • Morals? Ethics? Conscience? HA!
    • View Profile
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11346 on: November 24, 2014, 04:19:32 pm »

Quote
Hmm. Hyper competent High end guys like jim who never fail. My foreseen but ignored issue with d6 limitations. And enemies not fighting to their full potential.
I have ideas for this, but I'm not sure people, especially high end people, will like them.

I think I'm gonna go write my testament now.

Quote
And even without something like that, what happens when you face up against a group of UWM soldiers and miyamoto gets dropped becomes someone scrambles the inside of his avatar?

Then the monsters come out to play for a while and everybody loses :/

Quote
Questionable. I'd probably make you pay for it.

Heh, in that case xan, you will have to go bother some people to have them fork over their old suits.


Quote
If I were to use Amp users efficiently, I think we'd see AT LEAST one perma kill each time you encounter one in open combat. Hence, they use big stupid attacks that people can block and dodge and otherwise avoid.  I could always make them act consistantly and with the skills and powers they should have but...I dunno, it would be a pretty big ratcheting up in damage for you guys.

One thing I wanted to look into someday was creating a sort of 'kinetic shunt' but that only protects your body from direct amp tampering. So it'd prevent your head getting boiled, but if someone heated up the air around you it could still kill you. And if the UWM conveniently developed a similar system it would 'solve' the problem of non-dodgable instakills for both sides (or at least for higher-end UWM stuff and PC's). Though that wouldn't be a very elegant solution, I fully admit.
« Last Edit: November 24, 2014, 04:21:51 pm by Radio Controlled »
Logged


Einsteinian Roulette Wiki
Quote from: you know who you are
21:26   <XYZ>: I know nothing about this, but I have strong opinions about it.
Fucking hell, you guys are worse than the demons.

Harry Baldman

  • Bay Watcher
  • What do I care for your suffering?
    • View Profile
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11347 on: November 24, 2014, 05:20:56 pm »

Hmm. Hyper competent High end guys like jim who never fail. My foreseen but ignored issue with d6 limitations. And enemies not fighting to their full potential.

I have ideas for this, but I'm not sure people, especially high end people, will like them.

Well, I see several alternatives here:

1. State the ideas plainly before all who can hear them.

2. State the ideas plainly to the Inner Circle of the Elusive Balance.

3. Never speak of the ideas at all and simply test them out in a relatively controlled environment, take notes and presumably add to the great plan behind the scenes.

4. Implement the ideas wholesale, then see who dies and/or complains about them.

5. Forget the entire thing.

I suspect #3 is what you're likely to go for, but who knows?

Also, about the whole softballing thing, I suspect that's one of the reasons why tinkering isn't quite as useful as it could be - military challenges are already balanced to be doable without new and innovative designs (thus hampering sods, UWM tactics and amp specialists which we've already seen), while new inventions are balanced so as to not interfere with the already existing balance. Not necessarily saying that needs to change, but something to think about, I suppose. One thing to note is that changing this bit wouldn't really hamper the exploration side of things, either - look at Mission 18, for instance, where weaponry has thus far been entirely useless (or, rather, actively harmful for the players to use without altering its core purpose). Most of those challenges really don't benefit from advanced weaponry, military tactics or anything of that sort, since the challenges are often more environmental or straight-up ineffable in nature.

One thing I wanted to look into someday was creating a sort of 'kinetic shunt' but that only protects your body from direct amp tampering. So it'd prevent your head getting boiled, but if someone heated up the air around you it could still kill you. And if the UWM conveniently developed a similar system it would 'solve' the problem of non-dodgable instakills for both sides (or at least for higher-end UWM stuff and PC's). Though that wouldn't be a very elegant solution, I fully admit.

The kinetic shunt does seem like a very underutilized piece of equipment. Can't really blame anyone for not using it, though, shit is expensive, after all, and you could get a synthflesh body for an amount of money in the same ballpark as it like all the cool kids.
Logged

piecewise

  • Bay Watcher
  • [TORTURE_FOR_FUN]
    • View Profile
    • Stuff
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11348 on: November 24, 2014, 05:22:39 pm »

The idea I had was that we'd basically do away with numerical bonuses. You'd always roll d6, and standard rtd would always apply.

The difference being that high level skills would
1.allow you to do more sophisticated, powerful or impressive things that a lower skilled person couldn't do. (ie standard +0 amp user couldn't target the inside of things, couldn't target things they can't see, can't do micro scale actions, etc.  while someone with +1 or +2 could start having the option to do better stuff)

2.Failures would be less exaggerated. Jim, for instance, would never murder himself via 1 or 6. He would just fail in a less destructive or terrible fashion. For instance, if someone with +0 aux were trying to fix something, a 1 would  break it irreparably. Someone with +1 or +2 would fail and might suddenly require parts or tools or just extra time, but they wouldn't just break it unless they kept failing over and over.



I would also make it so things like end don't redirect shots: the shot depends on the source for where it goes, and end can help you deal with that damage. Ie +4 end won't make you invincible, by curving the bullets around you with a shield of meta-game.



I think this might work because it would still allow a progression of skill and power without just making high level players auto succeed all the time. Plus it will make it so I can use enemies a bit more realistically (the average UWM amp user might have +1 or so and act like that)

It would help to rebalanced things a bit and prevent there being a point where you basically become invincible. That combined with missions directed at higher end players could help things, I think.

Opinions?

NAV

  • Bay Watcher
  • I have an idea!
    • View Profile
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11349 on: November 24, 2014, 05:32:55 pm »

The idea I had was that we'd basically do away with numerical bonuses. You'd always roll d6, and standard rtd would always apply.

The difference being that high level skills would
1.allow you to do more sophisticated, powerful or impressive things that a lower skilled person couldn't do. (ie standard +0 amp user couldn't target the inside of things, couldn't target things they can't see, can't do micro scale actions, etc.  while someone with +1 or +2 could start having the option to do better stuff)

2.Failures would be less exaggerated. Jim, for instance, would never murder himself via 1 or 6. He would just fail in a less destructive or terrible fashion. For instance, if someone with +0 aux were trying to fix something, a 1 would  break it irreparably. Someone with +1 or +2 would fail and might suddenly require parts or tools or just extra time, but they wouldn't just break it unless they kept failing over and over.



I would also make it so things like end don't redirect shots: the shot depends on the source for where it goes, and end can help you deal with that damage. Ie +4 end won't make you invincible, by curving the bullets around you with a shield of meta-game.



I think this might work because it would still allow a progression of skill and power without just making high level players auto succeed all the time. Plus it will make it so I can use enemies a bit more realistically (the average UWM amp user might have +1 or so and act like that)

It would help to rebalanced things a bit and prevent there being a point where you basically become invincible. That combined with missions directed at higher end players could help things, I think.

Opinions?
I approve.
Logged
Highmax…dead, flesh torn from him, though his skill with the sword was unmatched…military…Nearly destroyed .. Rhunorah... dead... Mastahcheese returns...dead. Gaul...alive, still locked in combat. NAV...Alive, drinking booze....
The face on the toaster does not look like one of mercy.

Harry Baldman

  • Bay Watcher
  • What do I care for your suffering?
    • View Profile
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11350 on: November 24, 2014, 05:35:33 pm »

So it's kind of like the implied system in place with synthflesh bodies, for instance, where they can rip you in half despite it being possible that a non-synth plus an exoskeleton actually technically has higher strength and can't do the same?

All in all, I rather like that idea. The noble 1 has been very underexposed as of late, mostly coming up in hidden rolls, Speech/Charisma rolls and the like.

Only real problem I see, though, is the whole problem where high-end people actually have such things as builds based on the previous mechanics, so you might want to consider giving them refunds for decompensators, inelegant rule patches that they are. Or maybe rework how they function. If that's kept in mind, I'd certainly approve quite hard of all this.
Logged

Pancaek

  • Bay Watcher
  • Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence
    • View Profile
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11351 on: November 24, 2014, 05:38:32 pm »

Question: would this mean that, even with a +2 in a certain skill, you'd still only have a 1/6 chance to simply succeed? eg. when you roll a 5.
Logged

Radio Controlled

  • Bay Watcher
  • Morals? Ethics? Conscience? HA!
    • View Profile
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11352 on: November 24, 2014, 05:42:23 pm »

I think it could work, but might need some testing before using it, just to make sure. Perhaps, once the stuff on ship is over, round up a few volunteers and let them do a mini mission in VR tot test it?

One question would be in what detail this all would be worked out. Will you give a small list of stuff one can do or how rolls turn out at different skill levels for every skill and stat? Seems like quite some work, but then again it could be needed seeing as how we're all used to the old system.

Also, what to do with decomps? And overshots? Because without decomps, we still have the problem of constant overshooting all the time at +2. Perhaps couple this to the system proposed long ago that, after the first +1, other skill/stat point thresholds give dynamic bonuses? Because I kinda like being able to use my manip without overshooting extremely all the damn time (like how it was before I got the decomp).


And as Harry (the ninja) pointed out, what about people who really based their character around a certain build?
Logged


Einsteinian Roulette Wiki
Quote from: you know who you are
21:26   <XYZ>: I know nothing about this, but I have strong opinions about it.
Fucking hell, you guys are worse than the demons.

Xantalos

  • Bay Watcher
  • Your Friendly Salvation
    • View Profile
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11353 on: November 24, 2014, 05:43:45 pm »

Hmm. I've no idea what this would mean for myself. Would it make Xan less lethal to himself somehow? It's an oddly attractive idea.
Logged
Sig! Onol
Quote from: BFEL
XANTALOS, THE KARATEBOMINATION
Quote from: Toaster
((The Xantalos Die: [1, 1, 1, 6, 6, 6]))

piecewise

  • Bay Watcher
  • [TORTURE_FOR_FUN]
    • View Profile
    • Stuff
Re: Einsteinian Roulette OOC
« Reply #11354 on: November 24, 2014, 05:56:34 pm »

So it's kind of like the implied system in place with synthflesh bodies, for instance, where they can rip you in half despite it being possible that a non-synth plus an exoskeleton actually technically has higher strength and can't do the same?

All in all, I rather like that idea. The noble 1 has been very underexposed as of late, mostly coming up in hidden rolls, Speech/Charisma rolls and the like.

Only real problem I see, though, is the whole problem where high-end people actually have such things as builds based on the previous mechanics, so you might want to consider giving them refunds for decompensators, inelegant rule patches that they are. Or maybe rework how they function. If that's kept in mind, I'd certainly approve quite hard of all this.
Yeah, I would definitely give decomp refunds and probably let people respec if they were entirely based on old mechanics. It shouldn't matter for everyone I'm guessing (+1 is still useful, after all, bonuses still are bonuses) but I'm sure a few people really minmax'd like a mother fucker and would be rather miffed that it didn't matter as much now.

Question: would this mean that, even with a +2 in a certain skill, you'd still only have a 1/6 chance to simply succeed? eg. when you roll a 5.
It would mean more that 5 would succeed exactly as you want, 4 would succeed basically how you want, 6 would succeed but go a bit overboard, 3 would get about halfway there, 2 would fail, and 1 would fail with minor problems.

In other words, that +2 would be a "cushion" in a non-numeric fashion. Higher numbers mean less bad side effects and more possibilities for actions.

Hmm. I've no idea what this would mean for myself. Would it make Xan less lethal to himself somehow? It's an oddly attractive idea.
It would also mean that people like Xan with redonk bonuses wouldn't be constantly overshooting without an implant.
Pages: 1 ... 755 756 [757] 758 759 ... 2205