You say of annexing Crimea back to Russia like it's a bad thing.
Yep, it's a bad thing. For Tatars. For Ukraine it is bad, too, naval base is a good thing to have and losing Crimea will mess with our territorial waters, hurting Ukrainian economics. And having a war near our borders isn't nice, either. Finally that kind of annexing will show the way to other Ukrainian regions. So even with my lack of attachment to that territory, I don't want let it go
Well, about the national aspect, someone posted an ethnic map of Ukraine here or in Sheb's politics thread, and it said that about 78 percent of crimean population is Russian. A the most of others consider themselves Ukrainians, I presume. And I don't know exactly how much tatar are still living there, but I think that their numbers aren't big enough to make a considerable impact on some kind of referendum, which I think must be performed in Crimea in order to do something with their national/state politics thing.
As far as I know, Sevastopol, for instance, is still
Russian naval base. With
Russian fleet docking there permanently. Well, yes, Crimea has most of developed sea bases on Ukraine now, as far as I know, but I can also see some other places where Ukraine has access to sea, so, you won't be lethally injured on that point.
On the whole, I guess I have opposite opinion to annexation of Ukrainian territories to Russia because I'm Russian and you're Ukrainian
And that I think is pretty right.
Because I'm a imperialist seeking to reunite Russian territories to their maximum limits reached in 1867. Because you just want to see your country whole. That is natural. I do respect that.