PFP - That 6 hours later? I spent sleeping. >_>
CazInteresting vision there Caz, do you not see scumhunting in the questions I return to the person? Do you see those questions proposed to me as scumhunting?
I was referring to how you only reacted to the questions posed to you rather than posing any questions of your own. Do you really think you'll get an accurate reading from only interacting with a small fraction of players in the game? Or are you just content to let everyone else pose questions while you sit back?
Jim Groovester: You have been resurrected from death. How would you proceed, and how do you convince the town not to lynch you?
Tiruin lowers the front of her hat in a way that it points towards you.
"I am suspicious, sir."
This seems specific, and then moving to a general thought. What is your thinking behind the bolded part and why that exact proposition?
It's just a question. Why does it make you suspicious?
> ...Did you read my question right or are you just skimming over what I did? I posed my own questions there, and continued along that line--now, at this time, there were quite many other people posting posting posting questions questions questions. It isn't in the sheer quantity that makes it 'scumhunting', but in its essence. I sighed to myself and re-checked checked back to see if what I asked was asked before-so I did ask seeing as they were not asked before. Said queries which you seem to be apparently discarding without answering in lieu of the thought train despite missing the query which attempts to make sense of said train.
As in, check my questions. The last question in the first paragraph
is logically unsound after following up my query before that. Something which I do suspect you didn't do.
> ...So if something is just a question, it is then suspicious? Yes. In the matter of how you word it and how the other person analyzes it. Is there a problem in finding suspicion on that question?
Also you totally dodged my questions there bro. I'm not happy with that. Not a good thing. Please answer them, directly.
Jim...But that's just like a new game of sorts. People don't know your role and can only infer such from later actions - you may be town, scum or some silly variant of death and destruction and chaos and argh. The difference is that everyone else probably has a heads-up on you via information while you lounged in the room of the dead and traversed the rotating door of mortality, meaning: you got extra notes from Meph.
That's generally how people play it.
It would probably be smarter to just lynch any resurrected player, but that's a crude approach to the problem.
By how people play it, it sounds more like a policy rather than a theoretical problem to be pondered. You do say it is crude here, but is being crude the most efficient way? That's what I was challenging earlier on the notes of being resurrected. I get your point on playing it safe, but I don't see it when it comes to faction-based wincon following. You say you'll play a steady non-act game, and then saying its lame because...well, yeah, in a game with that, I figure 'lame' is not using everything at your disposal for survival but in the fear of using such, it hinders survival.
Here was the context of such and my query stands thus: As a third-party, you would be willing to act lone-wolf-idler given the pretense of being resurrected? Just the same as you would do if you were given a faction? Or would it be subjective given the matter of randomness and/or the situation at hand?
If people were to suspect you, would you just point fingers at others or do something else?
NerjinMax White I don't see how this is scummy and your recent attacks on NQT seem rather like McCarthyism to me.
(Please explain either in the [/abbr] tag or something what those terms are...) What is McCarthyism?
I fail to see how this line of reasoning holds up. Are you trying to be an aggressive IC by chance because, otherwise, you're seeming awfully keen on knocking of NQT. Specifically though the ending seems more like "You're not doing it right! You are scum!" Every town player wants to survive. It's a simple fact that, as humans and players both, we want to be alive at the end of the day and start of the next. Town players know we shouldn't behave like that but we do anyway. I'm sorry, but you're just making things up it seems so my vote goes to you.
Bolding for curious emphasis. You think Max is being an IC here? Why? Next, what do you have to say about Max' last posts because you seem to be intent on attacking him based on what he's saying to NQT--something which came off to me as but queries.
Second bolded part...what. That seems more like a rule you're stating, but then 'it happens anyway so there' is what I got from it.
Third, what. I really can't get you--how is the 'you're making things up' make sense there? Max is giving his viewpoint. NQT is giving his viewpoint. Minor notes along side each, they both have their own behavior--why do you generalize instead of attack those specific points?
NQTTiruin
I note that you seem to be voting or FoS'ing people who miss your questions? Something wrong with it?
[...]
Fixed that enough?
At this stage of the game, it's not unreasonable use of pressure, and sure, I get what your saying now.
[...]
[...]
[...]
[...]
I wish I had a bike that could peddle backwards.
Seriously, you were NKed twice as town on the first night, and suddenly you are feeling optimistic?
No, after that wincon comment, you don't look like town buddy.
I'm not a cop and this isn't a BM. I am town and I'm still quite optimistic about a win. I can see everything you said, but I don't see how any of it amounts to me being scum.
...At this stage of the game, you seemed to me that you were just FoS'ing or voting people for attention to queries-giving off the sign that you seem more apt to query than to proceed with a line of interrogative statements and build a lead or case on that. Superficial strikes, to say bluntly.
On that thing on Max, you're replying to what his context is, right--the BM, explicitly? Because that thing you say there like 'I'm not a cop' could translate to a soft claim or stuff like that--wherein the term cop could relate to a
lot of things with the theme of 'inspect' here. Just to say in advance given the...dueling statements on that one part.
Max, I'm curious why you're bringing out that one part there-what did it seem to you?