@Tiruin:
Yeah I was mainly getting frustrated because I felt like I'd explained the webadict bus thing a lot of times, and because you don't seem to be grasping the reason why Toaster is almost certainly not the killer from last night. Fair enough if you're just being thorough though.
For the record, you could've done
this earlier..it's by far the most convincing thing I've seen, barring speculation.
And that you got mad like its restating but that thing wasn't restating insofar as that it wasn't stated before >.>Incidentally, I've thought of some fairly compelling meta-reasoning: as a moderator, I would never put both webadict's role and a hidden doublevoter on the same mafia team. That's simply because they could jump out of nowhere and snatch a victory from a situation that should have been mylo.
This thing too..The thought was stuck in my head for the past night including all the anything which could differentiate a double voter from the rest in this context. But you arguing the meta 'double voters are mostly always town' really didn't do good back there, as a note.
...I'm still bewildered that the depression carries on for the universal voting.
I...really think its all on Leafsnail here. You could've also lolhammered early in today on my 'mistake', to add to that paragraph right there on what I asked you.
Lenglon could not have hammered.
51%.
...This is where I confused myself that the -1 also pertained to..well, universally >.> My mistake. Though the reasoning stands that it has been..too easy. Like scum have gone into paranoia that they set up their own doom by trying to predict too much-if Lenglon is scum
@
Lenglon:I'm hanging on a thread here. If you're town, then fight with your darndest. Yes the implications of you tracking x, y or z carried out earlier as something very believable (only person that can confirm people--Toaster is only confirmed due to him knowing where I..slept. And I believe we can only settle the dirt thing post-game given how decisive he is on those roses. I cannot find any other way to figure it out otherwise). If you doubt the double voter (which..is quite proven given the tie in the previous days)
All votes must be in red and bold for legibility. Unvoting before voting again is not required, but appreciated. You may vote for No Lynch. You cannot conditional vote. In case of a tie, no one will be lynched. The game has soft hammers; if at any point a player has 51% of all available votes, that player will be lynched and the day will end.
as seen here, and partly followed up because of..that very very weird universal vote malus.
I'd love to know why you did what you did though. And if you're scum..take it as a learning lesson, perhaps? Unsure why I'm stating this--must be the fatigue.
...Or the last scum is Toaster and he somehow knew where I slept (given that there is
no implication of a rose, but I was willing to believe Lenglon's gravedirt theory...
given how Ottofar got it, perhaps? The connections are strange in that Jim was town then, but bleh. I'd
really love to know who killed the Black Swan.)
this had the note of a lacking rose given how those things are issued.
Your claim matches with it though. [I find it funny that both you and Lenglon say 'eating dirt' like it was casual.]
Which is all very silly. And a flower has personal accessories somehow, like a glass bead and all those other things.
Toaster
- A dead butterfly
- A bit of wool
- Grass clippings
- A spool of thread
- A wooden spoon from the Great Hall
- Scraps of cloth
- A glass bead--all these are piled together by the bed in a uniform heap
Vector: Princess Toaster examines the gathered princesses. Is anyone- Princess Tiruin especially, wearing flowers? Any roses in particular?
Along the hem of each black funeral dress is embroidered a string of roses.
The night information you get is the night information you get. I will not confirm or deny night actions in-thread.
This sets off alarm bells for some reason along with Toaster completely going off into planting rather than giving flowers and economics.
The note that if Lenglon is innocent, and that she did state explicitly that she traced Toaster to me
...
Vector:Under what action-tag is an arsonist-ish's role kill under? The ability to tag and kill for later on? The tagging goes under...?
Yeah, wacky idea, but differentiating a role that can act--Griffionday--from a role who cannot act, which is me, then something's up with Toaster, or he really doesn't know what a rose is.
How is this not an answer? There's no dirt involved- I give people a rose, plain and simple. How am I supposed to expand on that when there's nothing to expand on?
Because the more people wear roses, the more they're planted, and that's a good thing.
...You can't plant a dead flower. >_>
The good thing is if they pollinate. Which requires being alive.
I-
How did you logic this one?
Edit: Woo, typo..
How does this make sense? I am not wearing a rose. Can you examine my body to check for roses?
Supply and demand. If there are lots of people wanting to wear roses, you have to plant more to grow more. This is good for plants.
...But none of us have an inclination to even wear a rose or receive a rose. I got completely nothing on getting a rose. I don't know how demand rises for roses when you're just giving it for free, every night, which somehow incites or stirs up our inner lustyness because we see a rose.
I could glance around and admire the clothing, but given that I did admire LS clothing before and that we now know that it has roses..I got nothing.
Your role is confusing and you are a rose. You say that you like roses being picked-nobody ever picked em.
...And I'd really love to see how you view giving others roses
in that way.
And for posterity, I'm sigging this for the hidden snark.
Hey, remember how the Prince fed you red herring? Maybe he'll feed you some more, since you like the taste of it so much.
PPE: Leafysnail
1. The puzzle
We know that there is a puzzle in this game, and that solving this puzzle means that the identities of the mafia members will be revealed. There is a clear and thematically appropriate pattern that points to you as the final mafia member. I have not heard any other suggestions for what the puzzle could be, or how any other hypothetical scumteam could fit a pattern.
Beautiful puzzle though. I was watching the thread like a hawk, but the puzzle lies in the essence of how everything was presented. That was a nice twist.
5. Night Four
Your claim night four is strange. Firstly, the mechanics of your role seem to be different, and no explanation is given for why. Secondly, you didn't claim your actual result in your first post, even though you could have done so.
It's also sortof unclear why you targeted Toaster and not me.
She targeted Toaster because Jim said so. And on that note, if she did anything like such, she may have targeted Jim instead.
..Or you targeted Jim. The anonymity of a double voter carries great weight, but the facts beforehand prove it stable whence I saw it.
4. The bus
I've explained several times why I think bussing explains webadict's behaviour yesterday best. Ultimately this point is mainly here to show you can be mafia though.
...It doesn't thoroughly explain Web's behaviour though. A bus, to be truly convincing, needs to have both actors stage a fight.
...Web just...
The last sentence could also apply to you though, if we disregard the voting pattern yesterday, and all other proof on the voting (I really doubt Vector would make a role only have a negative value apply to extensions or shortenings.)
Hey on that note!
VOTE COUNT
Leafsnail - Leafsnail, Lenglon
Toaster - Tiruin
Lenglon - Toaster
Tiruin
Not voting: none
Day end is currently scheduled for Thursday at 7:00 PM (-8GMT). One vote heard for extension to Monday at 7:00 PM (-8GMT). One more vote required to extend to Monday at 7:00 PM (-8GMT).
This is the final extension available. Make your time count.
Let's prove it twicemore.
Someone else extend then ask Vector for an extend count. If what Leafsnail says is true, then his opposition is worthless.
Unvote, Lenglon