Well I could say that he only got it now when he 'answered' the puzzle...from thoughts on watching an anime? I'm unsure-it sounded like that.
{..because there needs to be something that follows the story given action and reaction, and his detail focuses on you outright lying and all that}
wait wait wait, I outright lied somewhere? what? where did that happen?
Err, that's LS' explanation on the NKs. Given the scoreset of:
Roleblocker (x3 till bonus kill or they can just take the killing themselves as far as I can see)
Godfather (Ottofar could do the killings everytime. ...And he's only useful against Griffy-griff)
Tracker [He be talkin' about you.] (Given the context, someone would've played according to efficiency-the claims went off when Jim asked during..well, D3-ish.)
However, the state at which it all stands, Leafsnail is taking the active voice, and you're taking the passive voice despite it being the one going along some of my suspicions on LS' behavior, to state allegorically in a semantic manner. I get those hypothetical situations with the queries and explanations, but LS has given arguments which stand on defacing you--you seem to reply to them with hypotheticals. As of the moment, his explanation seems best, and you seem like diverting the notion or possibly appealing to thought = the best way, except that the thought in this situation cannot be appealed to without basis from both sides.
Can you address them directly and say how they're untrue? Like for example
this pairing system. I can abide by it because it makes sense. While it doesn't explain everything (I look at Toaster and his rose-like dirt theory), it makes sense enough to agree upon--in the way that it damns the last one standing by order of elimination.
Busy checking ~D3.
My thoughts in braces.
Though the logic here is..twisty. If you're sick of fighting ye ol'snail, what have you to say about his arguments presented against you?
I think that they're all over the place, and that I'm having trouble even following it at this point, which is why I asked him for a summary.
yet the evidence presented on your case (that being..well, an explanation on Webby-web's notes, which I'd like to see your thoughts on rather than irritation.
{In my case, I thought that Web entered 'panic red alert mode' when being found out.
...His enthusiasm was questionable, though, but it did lean on the panic rather than the 'bus me I'll be as weak as wood but not see-through'}
Lets put ourselves in Web's shoes from yesterday for a moment, shall we? Version 1, I'm his scumbuddy: Ok, so you're scumbuddy just outed you to the group, and is prepared to bus you to death, and it's MYLO. Do you: A) Give up, roll over, and die, or B) fight as hard as you can to survive.
well lets see, A makes the bus obvious, and B gives you a chance at pulling off a mislynch and winning on the spot.
so yeah, the smart move is to fight as hard as you can to survive.
{However the case presented is that it was a telegraphed ok, planned bus, because this version is susceptible to the fact that both people involved have a quicktopic chat to discuss it over. It skims over reason that your scumbuddy would out you without..well, quite anything beforehand.
But I do agree on one part-he didn't go out guns blazing. He went out mysterious and secretive.
Can you reword such to match that notion, like I asked > active voice rather than hypothetical situation?}
Version 2, Leaf's his scumbuddy: Ok, that darn tracker just tracked you to the nk, and you're probably going to die. do you A) roll over and die quietly, and tell your scumbuddy to call what happened a bus on the next day for a easy mislynch and win. or B) fight to survive, and hope to pull off the impossible?
Leaf's had all day yesterday and a very long night to plan out exactly how he wants today to go, and I respect Web's skill at Mafia, do you?
{I do, ma'am. I verily muchly do. But it doesn't click on how someone would kick the bucket that easily. He didn't offer...that much of a fight.}
@Spoiler above: All Web's posts detail down to these.
His words were terse BUT all his targets in the last link here may provide a clue. (Also someone who dances is just someone who dances. It depends on whether you dance with someone in the night or not. Just like me: Someone who punches doesn't directly equal someone punching anyone else who visits them in the night or not.
)
PS: It was MYLO
WHEN said bus issued. @Lenglon:
His other posts... prodded [see the 'prodded' part: Vector did answer the question correctly..just that it was
a whole different question due to vague wording.]
details in which the Mod was called in. Yeah, he didn't kill TWS. He was an accomplice to
murder.So why discuss Web again, and not the context in which the consequence resides?
Why am I awake anyway? whatever.
anyways, -snip-
O sleep, my dear, my bringer of night
Who hath brought me tears of delight
In thy arms I rest and repress
My stress and my sorrows, which in days coalesce
I wish I could sleep more than 3 hours...but I can't. SO nyah.
Extend in this situation because I don't think I'll be able in the next hours. [It'll end on a Sunday if this happens! And nobody will have an excuse to post in brevity.]
All: Opinion on No Lynch. The idea hasn't come to me until now, though.
I also forgot.
LS: To expound on that lore on your 2x vote, how did TWS affect you for you to have that--his music?
Those examples I'm saying? It feels like you're somehow changing facts to forward your arguments? Like, how you present Lenglon @D2 instead of D1 claim, and where she directly claims and has add-on effects like confirming Toaster gave a rose? I can understand memory mistakes, but doing it twice in a row is intriguing, to say the least.
Also can you restate/summarize your fullclaim? This is a serious question given that your style of claiming matches Okami-Web's. Pieces and bits at a time with no structured baseline to follow. Meaning: You claimed as time progressed back then.
And poking back
This is the first post of D4. Why would Scum Lenglon post this and put Scum Webadict in such a terrible spot before anything happens? Scum Lenglon could easily have claimed a track to Griffinpup from anyone else and probably have gotten them lynched. I'm all for scum bussing when it's useful, but I see absolutely no reason for this to happen. This isn't even WIFOM- there's zero gain in a bus at that point in the game.
You are calling Lenglon town and refusing to vote for her in spite of her nonsense claim and incredibly passive play throughout the game. If that isn't a gain for scum then what is?
However, I also think you haven't fully considered the situation from Lenglon's point of view. She had no way of knowing whether other people's night actions were confirmable, and if she lied about a townie's action she risked going 2v1 and dying meaninglessly. She also couldn't claim a genuine result because she was performing the kill, and certainly couldn't lie about webadict's action due to the fact that webadict's action is seen by the target. So it's actually the most risk-free option.
Incidentally, if I'm scum, you'd have to make a WIFOM argument about night 3 too. Because that would mean me and webadict decided to kill someone who we knew would make both of our roles weaker.
How nonsense was her claim, that now the situation requires explanation on something that happened instead of denouncing its entirety?
In the bolded part, how did you know it would make both of your roles weaker when, seeing Web-Okami's role,
it doesn't even state anything in it. The weaker in her version was the loss of a bonus-kill, but she still has the option of the faction NK.
tl;dr:
There was nothing that stated a loss of power with the absence of the musician. Moreover, it seemed more like a boon if the musician died instead.Is your role name
Black Shoes or something?
Author
Topic: The Lonely Prince: He Who Shall Serve (Read 193235 times)