Extend. Though, shouldn't the day have ended already?
God damn I'm bad.
From yesterday:
Lenglon:Irony: define lazy and explain how going out of my way to make trouble and prodding people for not doing anything falls under lazy. or having a case that's a hell of a lot better defined than your own, because I go into enough detail to actually list times and actions rather than to make vague lazy accusations of general "eh, I don't think I like the way you acted somewhere".are you really going to call me lazy for bothering to use the extend we had for something? is that lazy? yes, I acted scummy earlier. it was quite on purpose. have I been evasive about anything else this game?
Not you, me.
What would have been a useful response from LS? You say he jumped on you for making legitimate mistakes and that's a good thing, but he's still not town so...?
For that matter, why are you convinced he's not town again? I'd rather not go back and hunt for it through your 100+ posts.
I voted to extend because Toaster said he needed more time and I definitely needed more time.
Toony:Fuck dude, I answered both of those. Get your brain on.
Derp.
The substance and tone of your response sounded like a dismissive dodge, so I sort of made up my mind about you and stopped braindoing, and apparently reading. In my defense, I was in a hurry and had a lot of stuff to cover.
Your "who killed who" last night logic is dumb, remember how far ZU got by picking at my fucking grammar, nowhere. More likely than not, my brain-damaged logic has erred in some way. Stay calm and carry on.
However, now that I know you're not completely dodging, stop dodging. What was your thought process at the time, and why did it result in you saying what you said?
Dariush never explicitly dismisses Leafsnail, that was Vector/whoever the fuck now. He picked LS as his #2 Death Shaman.
Oh, so your "these people definitely can't be the DS" reasoning was based entirely on the public musings of someone you assumed was a witch? Do you still think they're a witch? You don't even know who they are, so...?
LNCP probably changed my history to throw suspicion on my character (the same way he "isn't fond of hunting witches"). If you want that as a vote reason than sure, NQT seems fine with it though.
NQT was also fine tying the vote to save his scummy hide. Why would I care what he thinks?
Yes, that's a plausible explanation. But given how much importance LNCP places on flavor, doesn't it seem more likely that it
wouldn't be a red herring, and that those are genuine clues about your true nature?
Arguably the following could also still be relevant even if you're insisting on trying to dodge/disown your prior statements thing entirely as well:
For that matter, do you think nobody being responsible is a valid possibility?
It's possible, but entirely unlikely in my opinion. If that's the case then what would this responsibility be, the rift?
That's why I want to know why you don't think it's the DS and think it's probably the witches but probably not the witches.
IronyOwl, besides being my obvious choice carrying over from yesterday, Leafsnail gets murdered by a plant thing and flips town (I think that's town?) so my doubts I had with agreeing with him are pretty much cleared.
I think so, and what is this, appeal to authority from a confirmed townie who listed a brief, unexplained "yeah that might make sense?"
That's twice now you're talking about what other people think rather than why other people should think that.
NQT:Irony Owl, you previously said your top scum picks were Lenglon and Toaster. At the end of yesterday you were voting Toonyman. Care to explain what made him scummier?
As I recall, I was focused on scumhunting Toony, and hadn't really gotten around to scumhunting Toaster. At the time my vote was more valuable on who I was actually scumhunting, and I didn't and still don't think witches are especially dangerous. Toony I suspected of being third party.
If I'd managed to get a post in shortly after his claim, I absolutely would have voted the confirmed witch suggesting town kills themselves. Later on, I probably would have kept it on Toony because Toaster was guaranteed dead anyway.
birdy:IronyOwl: We have not interacted much in this game so far, which is a bit of a shame. How come? Also what is your agenda for the day?
That is a shame. Presumably we've just never gotten around to scumhunting each other. You're a replacement for someone, aren't you?
My agenda for the day is mainly to figure out ToonyMan. Other than that, the usual of figuring out everyone else and whether we have any wincon shenanigans.
Shakerag:IronyOwl: Post. Also tell me what you think about the Dark Child.
Not sure. The obvious interpretation would be that it's a Bad Thing, maybe an SK, but I'm not sure if that's really the case. Being the source of our other kill is probably one of the only real options, though.
I don't know if that implicates his brother or not; I'd generally lean towards not, since the split seems plausible and having a brother who's not in on it to drop clues seems very flavorful and LNCP-y.
I do find it interesting that his burn mark was healing or partially healed or whatever the exact wording was. I wonder about the significance of that, but I'm assuming it doesn't matter at the moment.
Might as well give my final thoughts since it's likely I'm dead:
Don't like Toony at all. The weird flavor, the dismissiveness/roundabout defenses, everything makes me not trust him.
Don't like Lenglon, but his actions with the Toaster thing doesn't seem scum to me gutwise. I've certainly seen entire scumteams go down together and all that, but it doesn't quite mesh to me. Still not off the hook, but a lot less convinced than I was yesterday.
No opinions on anyone else, save NQT who seems town because of his willingness to tie the vote to save himself. My gut didn't like him, he did that, I went "OH! That's why I don't like him, he's naturally scummy!" Ironic and strange, but that's my take.
Derp on not having an opinion on anyone else. Oh well.
Author
Topic: Witches' Coven: In the Heart of Darkness [GAME OVER: 4/13] (Read 201231 times)