Tiruin
No, I won't full claim. I have told as much as I am comfortable with regarding everything--it is in your (plural) discernment to trust or not to trust.
...And yes I'm running this errand for my father. Why do you ask?
The first time I read this, and until now, I'm still confused. Why the first question?
So you're saying that even in the hour before a certain lynch you wouldn't claim. Why not? What's to lose? The OP mentions the possibility of magic keywords; how do you feel about magic? Also, specifically, is your wincon the errand for your father? Has he asked you to kill someone? The way you're acting now, you're not giving the town much reason not to lynch you.
...My cynical side believes you're just setting this up for a vote.
Or I'm really looking at that paragraph with a flat face. Why would a father ask his daughter to
kill people, exactly? Straightly, no. I am in no way going to, or believing my character will, kill. Ever.
Searching for people yes.
Protecting people, yes.
Ensuring they survive, yes. My wincon is not my errand for my father [or..it can be, metaphorically.. It's my mother's advice which does, and that's what I omit]. Why do you ask about this errand?
I already told you why I'm not giving extra information and you're prodding me for more when I can't even say myself 100% about that matter myself. Trust me on this, if I was to have such and such like this which would benefit the town, I'd say it, but this is too early to tell.
Besides that: I've two votes on me and their crux is me being a third-party. Why did I claim in the first place? Oh no, how foolish. Details on why and the cause? Non-existant.
But really, if that's the cause of me being lynched..well, me being upset shall forever be placed IC on stupid peasants who'd rather policy vote than not and use the slimy case of metaknowledge to get a lynch in favor. Purely in metaknowledge.
The way you're acting now, you're not giving the town much reason not to lynch you.
And I don't have to. People's opinions and viewpoints differ, and by the 'you're not giving much reason' reflects your own, in a subtle manner. 'Much reason' is as much relative as how you see me in correlation to what is defined as scummy.
You people will have to decide a case on the matter. I cannot say anything else, sir. I've already given my case, pointed my posts. If they'll lynch me based on the illogical notion of metaknowledge..well, that's just disgusting, really. It's like playing the mod's game and getting puzzles from that point. If the lynch goes because 'O NO U OMIT INFO', well try to think DEEPER than the superficial idea of 'why does she want to deny us information? She's a third-party. The only answer would be malevolence D:<' for while I do understand that concept, I've given enough already on that matter. Even more, for those with astute eyes.
Now don't take me wrong, that is an understandable (albeit a poor) way to discuss and debate matters such as these, but I've looked back into those mafias and I could say that other methods of reasoning could readily take the place on this notion and it would all be the better.
Unless you like being lazy and making it a policy in LNCP's games.
Why not? What's to lose?
Everything; no, not for me. Many others will lose more than what I've to lose because if I give out the information I'm omitting, it's like giving the piece of cake you have to the cake they have. Which is significantly bigger than your sugary slice. The reason I'm omitting this is purely because it would give the enemy an advantage (alright, it would give everyone information, but information which can be manipulated by malevolent factions.)
Ugh.
What are you leaning on NQT? You give the idea of me being a benevolent third party, then put that idea to the test and compare it with what I've to give as a summary. I have already done that. See the case to Irony? See my case on Toaster?
What exactly are you looking for.