Not to gang up on you
Unfortunately it seems to be a recurring theme among bay12 threads that I end up with half a dozen posters all disagreeing with me, me trying to respond to everyone, then it degenerates into people nitpicking over tiny little things and totally missing the overall picture. Eventually I give up trying to respond to 3-5 posts for every one of mine, and you all get to feel good about yourselves for having "won" and I wonder why I waste my time.
Standard bay12 discussion thread.
most of the examples that you cited, and which I was familiar with, were pretty bogus and terrible examples of relevant female characters with actual strength
1) I disagree with your characterization
2) You came to that conclusion by ignoring half my examples
3) I was giving an
honest and complete list, not an incomplete and biased one. If I give the following list: "1,1,1,1,2,2,6,10" and say "most of those numbers are less than 5" it's not reasonable for you to point out 10 and claim that my examples don't support my conclusion.
4) It's not reasonable to dismiss two of my examples just because they happen to be in a genre that doesn't easily lend itself to supporting your position.
If you're pretending that women aren't marketed beautiful, flimsy, and impractical things almost exclusively, while men are marketed plain, sturdy, and functional things, you're the one with the tinted lenses good sir.
...what?
This is
what I said:"If a man holds open a door for a women, did he intend:
a) You are a woman. I like women. I choose to be courteous to you.
b) You are helpless and weak and I'll hold this door open for you because you're too pathetic to do it on your own.
If he intends a, and you get angry because you feel b, is that really his fault?"This is how
you interprted it:
"you're pretending that women aren't marketed beautiful, flimsy, and impractical things almost exclusively, while men are marketed plain, sturdy, and functional things"How did you get from A to B?
The point of my comment to Vector was that people are
trying to give her something they think she'll like. If they're wrong and she doesn't like it...ok, maybe they're wrong, and that's unfortunate. But to misinterpret that intent and get angry that they're trying to sell her things that aren't particularly functional is to view the situation through heavily distorted lenses.
"I be nice to you by opening a door --interpreted as->"you think I'm helpless."
"I give you something beautiful" --interpreted as-> "oh, you only give women lousy, impractical things."
Do you understand the analogy now? Nobody's "pretending" that women aren't marketed things with more emphasis on pretty than functionality. Yes, I totally acknowledge that, and I don't know why you thought otherwise.